Show me a worse interior. You can't.

Cost cutting and being "modern" are also factors but i despise how when tesla got MASSIVE in the late 2010s everyone started looking at screen interiors and years later we got this shit

it's better on the premium. worst part is the screen is so tall and so much of it is just bezel. there's a good inch and a half on the top and sides. makes it look very outdated and chunky. i predict the facelift will sport a much slimmer screen with the on-screen controls moved back to physical buttons to make it look sleeker and sportier.

This interior will show up in 20 years on a "worst car interiors of all time" compilation. It's the Fiat Multipla of interiors.

>>28490993
>that awkward bent part where the bezel is
they really should have gone back to the drawing board before pumping out this abomination

>>28490998
Aside from the screenslop, which infests every new car, it's actually quite nice. I don't understand what your problem is.

>>28490976 (OP)
That was easy.

>>28490983
This shit doesn't even look modern

The iphone ui is almost 20 years old at this point

it's cheap gay bullshit I dont want anywhere near my car

>>28491107
Blowjob blocker
Gay row of buttons
Your wife's vibrator that controls the infotainment I assume?
That digishifter lol

I dont dislike a screen in the car like most but it should be kept on the level of a honda civic

>>28490998
This would be so kino with real dials and a sequential stick mama mia

>>28490998
I drove my friends C8, the squircle steering wheel is odd at first.

>>28490998
I like it desu, looks comfy and locked in, like a cockpit. The way everything is tilted towards you is cool. The 90's supras had this kinda styling too (the newer versions just don't have the same sovl).

>>28490998
this is pretty good slapped on screen aside. if it was in dash it would be banger

>>28491843
I just realised I literally typed out 'desu' instead of t b h. Goddamn.

>>28491981
anon...
it's inoperable

>>28490998
>>28491843
C4 was also like that in the 90s.

>>28491981
Just edit the post

>>28491843
that seat fabric is rad

>>28490983
at some point the windshield is just going to be like a vision slit in a bunker

>>28493274
SUV interiors were always like this though. It just looks taller because the screen is set back. But they have always had absolutely monolithic dash boards.

>>28493305
>they have always had absolutely monolithic dash boards
Post 1996 or earlier interior of the same truck lol
Or 2007-2013, those aren't "driver-centric"

>>28490976 (OP)
hyundai santa fe is pretty bad

>>28493317
Oh sure let me go find an interior picture of a 1996 Cadillac Escalade

Edit: wtf why can't i find one?

>here's your $52,000 interior bro

>>28493329
An Escalade's just a leathered up Suburban you tard.

>>28493329
Because Cadillac Escalade up until 2001 was a rebadged Yukon Denali with the interior shared with other GMT400s except that floor console? The one you decided to post for some reason.

>>28493305
Here's your "monolitic dash board", whatever that means

>>28493338
>>28493340
Oh so what you're saying is the interior of that 1998 Escalade is identical to the interior of a 1996 Suburban? So why nitpick so hard over a 2 year difference on two cars that are exactly the same? Like if they made a 1996 Escalade then there wouldn't have been a problem at all?
I mean we can go back to the 60s. They still had huge dashboards. A big ass engine needs a big ass hood and a big ass hood needs a big ass dashboard.
The argument you SHOULD be making is from the outside. Because the top of the dashboard is higher off the ground compared to an older one, because the hoodline is taller compared to an older one. But that's not the argument being made.

>>28493353
>So why nitpick so hard over a 2 year difference on two cars that are exactly the same?
Because they added a breadbox on the passenger side in 1997, retard

>>28493305
posting a facelift GMT400 interior is cheating lmao, they're so awful

>>28490976 (OP)
At least it has a normal gear shift knob, button shifters are getting way too common now

>>28491113
I might be a contrarian and hate these cars overall, but the simplistic design kind of works. It's very stark and utilitarian, not pretty but not necessarily ugly.

>>28493442
>one screen in the middle
>no gauges whatsoever
What part of this abomination "works"?

>>28490993
>worst part is the screen is so tall
This isn't a problem for non manlets. Many who own the new mustang report that they thought the screen would suck and get in the way but its not bad at all

>>28493442
>that steering wheel
>lack of physical controls
>single glossy display for everything
>utilitarian
Tell me you don't drive without telling me.

>>28491113
I'm ok with tesla interioirs. It's part of their style and they're not trying to be something they should not