>>28494865>Picrel is its latest versionYour pic looks like a Chinese attempt at cheap BMW honestly. A couple of weeks ago I saw another similar shitbox across the street, but for nearly a minute I wasn't sure if it's a Skoda or another transverse Bimmer.
>Some of those are easily wide enough for two adults.They aren't wide enough externally, and you can't fool Euclidean geometry. Go measure the chair or the desk you post from, 70 cm is barely enough to comfortably fit an adult male sitting still at the keyboard. And you have to move your shoulders and arms to actually drive, and there are other things people frequently do in their cars like taking off or putting on their upper garments.
>You might even be able to squeeze 3 people in the back, though then they'll definitely be rubbing shoulders.47 cm per person is worse than economy class seating, and those at least have armrests and probably more leg and especially thigh space too.
These are the cars for twinks.
Another thing is they probably are the worst to wrench on because of the tight packaging everywhere, so they aren't enthusiast cars at all. And not family cars either: I get spending less money to save on the plane tickets or on the rental, because these are temporary inconveniences, but willingly spending your own money to repeatedly subject your own family to squeezing? Only if you're so poor you don't have money to buy something larger. Especially not buying the "two kids" argument: kids usually have various equipment coming with them, from child seats and big packs of diapers to strollers, bicycles and toys. You need trunk space for that.
