>>28518115>>28518116Fucks wrong with you? Its a legitimate question.
>>28518120You post your faggotry every day. Get fucked.
>>28518124Wrong person. I havent posted on this board for a year at least. Show me the last few threads so i can read through them.
>>28518129I will do no such thing. This is a bait thread and you know it.
>>28518134Then stop posting in it yeah?
I can accept phasing out gasoline only vehicles for hybrids, which in my opinion(desu) have no downsides except for weight.
But fully electric vehicles have so many insurmountable issues that going all in on them seems like signing your own death warrant.
Man made climate change is real.
ICE engines need to be phased out sooner.
>>28518113 (OP)see you in 2039 where the manufacturers suddenly go back to making petrol engines lul citing "difficulties/challenges/hurdles" around EV design
>>28518113 (OP)Every single company on that list has backpedaled. Even chink Volvo where evs are completely dominant now.
>>28518113 (OP)Reliance on oil is great for national security, if you're making non-oil alternative (China). US is currently hampering its own internal development by placing regulatory burdens on any new lithium mining. Its further placing burdens on EVs by subsudizing trillions per year for oil development and further trillions per year more in health cost related to co2 pollution and and noise pollution from the combustion car.
>>28518113 (OP)half of these plans are no longer relevant due to EV sales being to low
>>28521236retard
ghge
md5: 4c182f91a8c082dbc0ceba2ba542ba9b
🔍
>More GHG emissions come from agriculture than cars, and agriculture also is linked to deforestation and entire species extinctions>Over 1/3rd of all medical spending is tied to obesity and overeatingOP, why don't you go over to /ck/ and tell them to eat the bugs from a bug trap in their backyard?
>>28521236>30+ hour bump on a troll thread with 12 repliesSee:
>>28518115