Want this for $38,500 (tech+, awd, 150hp turbo 1.5l)
What do you guys think?

>spending $40k on chink bullshit
LOL.

>>28521349
What's wrong? You can't buy anything comparable for this money

>>28521355
no buttons

>>28521355
A RAV4 starts at $29,550.

>>28521345 (OP)
>doesn't start at $12,000 with load

>>28521426
Load?

>>28521362
So?

>>28521369
More like 44,500

>>28521694
No, not more like that

>>28521345 (OP)
>tech+
Uninterested.
>turbo 1.5
Uninterested
>cuckover
Uninterested
>Chinese
Uninterested

I rate it 4U

>>28521345 (OP)
only if you need it as a family car and won't be keeping it for more than 3 years

>>28521732
So what would you buy then?

>>28521345 (OP)
>cuckover
DIE FAGGOT

>>28521844
Honda CR-V, Chevrolet Trax, Mazda CX-50, Toyota RAV4.

>>28521345 (OP)
I think you're retarded

>>28521844
Cars I am theoretically interested in (my current car is under 100,000 miles and I don’t intend to buy a car for several years unless something happens to it) in no particular order:

Ford Mustang
Ford Bronco
Nissan Frontier
Porsche Boxter S
Chevrolet Silverado EV
Toyota Yaris GR
Hyundai Ionic 6
Jeep Wrangler Sport
GMC Sierra HD AT4

I don’t mind technology in pursuit of something, but cars that try to sell me on technology instead of performance usually are gilding a lily and fucking up in the process, by doing things like putting headlamp controls in a fucking touchscreen menu. I’m not interested in a tall vehicle that is tall for no purpose and worse at its actual purpose thereby. I am not interested in small displacement turbo motors doing the job of a less stressed larger displacement motor, and I’m not interested in Chinese.

>>28521844
Buick envista or envision

>>28521924
My only real problem with the Envista is it's powered by a woeful 1.2L turbo three cylinder with 137 horsepower. It does have 162 lb-ft of torque however but still.

>>28521740
Haval is on the market here for like 20 year, my mom had it in 2011

>>28521345 (OP)
Genuinely what meaningful features do you get for spending the extra 28k over what you'd spend on an older car? Also SUV slop. Kys.

>>28521924
> Buick
Never heard of that. Haval is seems more knowbln to me.

> CVT 1.2L 184hp
Geez. That's even more slop than Haval I've mentioned..

>>28521861
Crossovers are most universal body type for general use.
Also, good in snow.

>>28522927
> Genuinely what meaningful features do you get for spending the extra 28k over what you'd spend on an older car
It's new. Wasn't repaired on some junkyard by Azeri like Simeon from gta5

Also. I want adaptive cruise, automatic breaking, monitoring of blind spots and all other modern features.

>>28521885
> sell me on technology instead of performance
In this thread people are literally advertising me some "Buick" (never heard of that car maker) with 1.2L 184hp car that looks even more like it's electric slop.
> doing things like putting headlamp controls in a fucking touchscreen menu.
Jolion don't have that.

> a tall vehicle
It's standard 1.6m tall.

>>28521877
> Honda CR-V, Chevrolet Trax, Mazda CX-50, Toyota RAV4.
This care are at least 30-40% more over budget

>>28522923
>Haval is on the market here for like 20 year
ok so?
>my mom had it in 2011
HAD,that thing was probably crushed by the end of the decade

>>28522958
>AD,that thing was probably crushed by the end of the decade
No she had this until 2023
It was reliable, but rusted. Many care rust in salt though

>>28522950
>CR-V Starting at $30,920
>Trax Starting at $20,500
>CX-50 Starting at $30,500
>RAV4 Starting at $29,550

>>28522968
Cheapest crv I could find is 47,500 here
Cheapest RAV4 is well beyond 50,000

Buy it if you like it. Never ask this shithole their opinion. It will ALWAYS be some variation of “ugly, slow, gay, eggshit, weebshit, monster truck, mcdonalds struts”

>>28522941
>In this thread people are literally advertising me some "Buick" (never heard of that car maker) with 1.2L 184hp car that looks even more like it's electric slop.
One, it wasn't me, and 2, if you don't know what Buick is, you're not Chinese, or from North America so why the fuck are you shilling some Chinese car on an American website for?
>Jolion don't have that.
Great, don't actually care, it is just an example of bad human engineering that is the result of seeking to have high technology for its own sake. If you market your car as "high tech" (or in this case, tech+), I expect some similar kind of retardation from you. You are advertising technology independent of whatever goal the technology may have, so that tells me it's got tech features for the sake of having tech features instead of tech features that are designed to provide me with a good human to car interface, good performance, good safety, etc etc.

This car is clearly meant to be a commuter vehicle for people who don't actually need high performance or large tow ratings or off road confidence, so 1.6 meters is 15-20 cm too tall in my opinion. I know that the old women who represent the average car buyer in the US tall vehicles with upright seating because they have reduced sensation of speed in addition to them being easier for people with limited hip mobility to ingress/egress from the car, but I don't care, I don't like that class of vehicle.

Tiananmen Square 1989 June 4

>>28522932
All useless garbage.

for that money I'm getting a real Peugeot, not some temu shit

>>28521877
The OP has the misfortune of living in Russia. His only options for under $40k are either Chinese ricemobiles, a clapped out, barely mobile German rustbucket or an UAZ Patriot (maybe, idk if they jacked the price up again).

Lmao so the russian serfs arent even allowed to have chinese Buicks?

>>28523362
Western propaganda

>>28521844

>>28523356
>if you don't know what Buick is,
It was sold mostly in the US.

>>28521345 (OP)
DESU i'd say you should look for something cheaper, maybe go get a geely or a BYD? but there's 100% cheaper chinkmobiles with similiar performances

>>28523025
I will

>>28523356
>tech+
Geez, it's just name of this exact unit

>>28523376
>real Peugeot
In Russia many repair shops have this on their door.

Roughly translates as "we won't repair lion king, twat and spruce"

>>28521345 (OP)
>$38,500
no thanks, I'll buy a second hand landcruiser for 10k

is this what russhits have to deal with? what a filthy country holy balls

>Have all
>The problems

Buy a GAZ TIGR but the civilian one

>>28521345 (OP)
is this chinkshit? they figured out how to copy ICE now?

>>28521345 (OP)
first time I saw one of these things I couldn't get over how whack the wheel fit looked on it
the wheels looked too small and sat too far inside the wheel arches. Looks like they took the wheels from a micro hatch and shoved them on

>>28524443
Buick only didn't go the way of Pontiac and Oldsmobile because of China. I expect anyone talking about chinese domestic market cars to know what a Buick is. OP is apparently living in Golden Horde territory instead however, so I guess that explains not knowing Buick.

Anyways, I dunno what to tell OP to buy instead, except for to say that you're less likely to have your car commandeered by the RuAF to be used to transport steppe meat to the mobile crematoriums in Ukraine if it is not suitable for dirt road driving, so it's probably best to get something that is low to the ground if you can, but if I were you, I'd use the car money to escape Russia instead.

>>28521345 (OP)
looks like renault clio and toyota rav4 had a retarded child
>40k for a chinese cuckover
you can get škoda kodiaq with 2.0 tdi for that money. Bigger with better engine

>>28524454
>geely
It will rust in salt

>>28524564
2003, repaired by pakis

>>28524990
They already figured out how to make more electric cars than rest of the world.

>>28524964
They don't sell it. Anyway, it's manual and I don't want manual transmission.

>>28525513
>you can get škoda kodiaq with 2.0 tdi for that money
Not in Russia, lmao

>>28525270
Haval Jolion looks okay.

This byd looks like something you talking about.

>>28525513
> you can get škoda kodiaq with 2.0 tdi for that money.
No you can't.

I remember one blogger shilled for this shit, trying to avoid that all electronic assistants, keyless entry and all that stuff won't work and it cost like Tank 300 lmao.

>>28525499
>chinese domestic market cars
But it isn't one. Haval is not very popular in China at all.
>I guess that explains not knowing Buick.
I know what it is, but for me it's those 1950s fallout looking cars, didn't know they still in business.

The only Chinese vehicle I'd consider buying right now is this

>>28526587
Why mutts love open beds so much. Anyway, in most countries vehicle with full max weight over 3500kilos considered a commercial truck, so it's license C.

>>28526594
Kill yourself you fucking europoor, we get it, you've never worked a day in your pathetic cuck life which is why you hate trucks so much.

>Over 3500
That's a midsize truck with a 4 cylinder you retarded eurocuck

Further proof europoors need to be rangebanned

>>28526601
too fat even for this board

>>28526571
>Haval Jolion looks okay
i dont think so

>>28526601
>cucktruck
>work
the only vehicle that you can look at and know for sure that the owner actually uses it for work is a van, unless its a camper

>>28526943
Most likely, you are used to the perverted designs of European cars of recent times. Cars used to have such arches.

>>28521345 (OP)
>What do you guys think?
Your IQ is definitely under 70.

>>28528098
Why? It's decent variant for the money.

>>28526557
NOOO BUUMER

bump

chinks wont do that