>>28622321 (OP)
>before the record "corrected"
It's always funny to read a car magazine's review of a newly released model comparing it to the outgoing model, and then read the outgoing model's original review when it was released. They're sometimes 180' apart. Journalists all sort of follow the same 'memes' about each car, and even when they express an original opinion it's just one person's opinion. Everyone takes them like gospel.