Thread 28711370

Which reasonably-priced High-performance Honda should I get?
This Track-Monster?
>2025 Civic Type R
does an absolutely skull-warping brutal 0–60 mph: 5.9 sec

>only $65k for this Honda Passport
>Horsepower (SAE net): 285 hp @ 6100 rpm
BRUTALLY POWERFUL

>>28711370 (OP)
>$55k
LMFAO

>>28711377
I should go with the BRUTAL, and RUGGED Passport, then?

>>28711378
its not as humiliating as paying 55k for a fuckign civic

>>28711379
You're right. I think I need to go Acura TLX then.
>355-HP* | 3.0L V6 Turbo
>an absolutely psychotic 0-60 in 5.2s
>a mere pittance of $66k

>the cheapest mustang you can buy
>ecosneed i4 turbo 315 hp 350 lb-ft
>5.0 second 0-60
>$32,320

>the most expensive civic you can buy ASSFUCKER DEVASTATOR EDITION
>turbo i4 315 hp 310 lb-ft
>$45,895

>>28711370 (OP)
stupidest fucking post ive seen all day
a cheap tesla can go 0-60 in 3-secs but nobody really gives a shit about 0-60 except stupid no car zoomers

>>28711404
>n-nobody even c-cares about 0-60!!
LOL

>>28711370 (OP)
>slower than a 40 yearold fox body that had 225hp
Jesus that's sad.

>>28711404
Every single car enthusiast on the planet cared about 0-60 until EVs started to win, at which point car enthusiasts decided that akshually it doesn't matter

>>28711403
chuck

>>28711370 (OP)
0-60 doesn't matter anymore now that bev appliances can beat it for a couple runs until they burst into flames. What you really want is a drivers car. A FWD four door doesn't seem like the formula for a track monster. Then again who fucking cares anymore, just buy what you want.

>>28711539
No. Now that grandma's tesla does 0 to 60 in 2 seconds what OP needs is a sports car to slay some vaginas. Ever pull up to a group of black chicks in a 100k corvette as a white male? I must have 15 babies out there with no daddy. Make me feel proud to call my self black on the inside and doing my duty of raising the average IQ of black babies. Gods work anon

>>28711532
0-60 definitely still matters a lot. It just matters a bit less nowadays because of EVs as well as many performance cars having over 400 hp which makes RWD launching completely traction limited. Further, performance automatics shift ridiculously fast now.

Which means it basically devolves to 500 hp AWD automatic beats anything 0-60 that isn't a AWD automatic with higher hp. So the 0-60 wars are more boring. Not that it doesn't matter.

And EVs didn't really kill the wars, the GT-R did. 3.3 second 0-60 in 2008 with it's AWD, fast automatic and high hp. Everyone else followed suit.

>>28711370 (OP)
Just get a Tesla if you're such a speed demon. You're not gonna do road trips in your boy racer ricer.

>>28711370 (OP)
It's another "I want to buy a car" thread

>>28711378
That's a really nice AWD NA V6 SUV that will last you a long time

>>28711602
>And EVs didn't really kill the wars, the GT-R did. 3.3 second 0-60 in 2008 with it's AWD, fast automatic and high hp. Everyone else followed suit.
Brother neither you nor I nor anyone else ITT know anyone who owns an r35 and they've been available since 2008. Everyone knows someone with a tesla.

>>28711370 (OP)
>55k
>4.9S 0-60
I am convinced that if you buy a new car for track use, rather than an old 90s/early 2000s shitbox you are retarded and don't actually care about racing.
>>28711404
>>28711532
I don't mind electric race-cars actually and their 0-60 times are impressive. Some are even very fun to drive apparently like the Chink Cyberster.
Problem is you have to abandon tesla to make this argument.
Tesla is overpriced, shoddily built, led by and heavily associated with the biggest retard on the planet and is the darling of movement/group of people who are in total only slightly less retarded. It's the worst possible example of an EV you can make.
>Okay the Corvette may be fast but it has the same 0-60 as the SATAN"S FAVORITE EVIL CHILD MUNCHER 6000 GAY AGENDA SUPER GT, but it's electric so i guess it suddenly doesn't matter anymore chud!
This is your argument with Tesla.

If you want to advocate for EVs, I would start recommending cheap&fast chink cars as they have both good performance and a low entry price. But of course for Americans it might as well be as bad as Tesla since it's chinese, shame EU cucks can't make a small, light fast fun EV and insist on building yet another EV tank for 200 000$ dollars.

>>28712068
>randomly starts melting down about Elon and shilling chink shit
Fuck off.

>>28711602
>as well as many performance cars having over 400 hp which makes RWD launching completely traction limited
Sounds like your engine is in the wrong place.

>>28712142
Sounds like you're a retard who doesn't know it's still traction limited. The fastest Porsches are AWD automatics.

>>28712139
bro doesn't know we chug musk cum on this board

>>28712219
>reee musk bad!
I don't care, fuck off.

>>28712227
You have to acknowledge that while he did do a lot of good for EVs in general by putting them into the mainstream and getting some real money behind them
He is starting to become more trouble than he is worth as he went from being mostly bi-partisan to heavily supporting one side and trying to build his own agenda while doing so which exposed how much of a retard he is.Go watch his newest shareholder meeting, motherfucker can't go 3 words without saying "uhhh" or losing the plot.

Chinks are ahead in the EV tech game and that is just a fact, advocating for EVs while hating on china is like saying you love apple pie but hate the fruit. One takes part from the other and most EVs have Chinese shit in them no matter how much you complain about it.

>>28712707
The fuck are you talking about, faggot. Schizo elsewhere.

>>28712748
My original reply was to 2 posts which brought up EVs and Tesla specifically.
They are perfectly on topic
You are just throwing around ad hominems because the replies happen not to glaze your fucking internet boyfriend who is a massive tard.

>>28712707
>advocating for EVs while hating on china is like saying you love apple pie but hate the fruit.
Chinaman isn't ahead, they're just CHEAP.
Like everything else, they pretend to be a business while undercutting market. We should do that too but we're too concerned with 'free markets'

>>28711370 (OP)
But it’s over 50k to get one kid.hope you won’t regret for this choice when you gonna double pay for the jdm tax

>>28711404
Exactly. 0-60 hasn't mattered since VW came out with the DSG and became super fast due to the transmission and launch control, nothing else.

No one talks about these times unless they're serious drag racers and are heavily modified.

I would never buy a non manual sports car, nor a fwd one. They're capable, but not fun. You may as well get a Ford Raptor if you just want to go fast in a straight line

>>28711532
As above, DSG killed it way before EV

>>28711588
I'm too fatigued to even enjoy your joke