that seems like alot of work for no gain im sure you can find some filter to make your pictures shitty much easier
Creating custom LUTs/ICC profiles
Archived
I've figured out an extremely wonky pipeline of taking a digital photo, exporting it as a linear tiff to a python program that emulates a developed negative of Kodak 250D, and then using Negative Lab Pro to invert it.
It works perfectly but it takes forever, so I want to shoot a color test chart, do the whole process and then build a LUT or profile from the color chart that skips all of the intermediate steps so it can be done in one click in lightroom or whatever program. How can this be done?
It works perfectly but it takes forever, so I want to shoot a color test chart, do the whole process and then build a LUT or profile from the color chart that skips all of the intermediate steps so it can be done in one click in lightroom or whatever program. How can this be done?
20 posts omitted.
Go to thread.
Dehancer lightroom plugin is pretty good. Easy to pirate as well, just have to look around a bit. I like it since I don't have to alter my workflow much, import to lightroom after cull and just 'edit in > dehancer' the ones I want to fuck with
>>4449563 (OP)
>Kodak 250D
These fake film fx always produce images that look like bad digital images fucked up to look like bad film images. They all look like shit
>Kodak 250D
These fake film fx always produce images that look like bad digital images fucked up to look like bad film images. They all look like shit
>>4456408
that is a crazy piece of software, its like dehancer, but "pro". thats gonna take some time getitng used to.
yeah, you cant have anything like that in a cube lut, watch out for hidden microcontrast (dehaze/texture/etc) settings too, they mostly fuck everything up.
that is a crazy piece of software, its like dehancer, but "pro". thats gonna take some time getitng used to.
yeah, you cant have anything like that in a cube lut, watch out for hidden microcontrast (dehaze/texture/etc) settings too, they mostly fuck everything up.
>>4455935
I may post the results later, but if you want to take a look at the program, it’s called agx_emulsion on GitHub. It’s a bit wonky to install and it takes like 90 seconds to compute a full resolution image. It’s neat but it takes a ludicrous amount of time, the parameters are confusing and...
I may post the results later, but if you want to take a look at the program, it’s called agx_emulsion on GitHub. It’s a bit wonky to install and it takes like 90 seconds to compute a full resolution image. It’s neat but it takes a ludicrous amount of time, the parameters are confusing and...
