>>507075839>Invades Canada with the goal of annexationWe invaded Canada because that's where the enemy was. We did not lay claim to all British American colonial claims in the Treaty of Paris like the Mexicans did when they won their independence. It was an absurd overreach as history itself eventually revealed: That's why they don't have it, genius. They never really did.
>yet the US asked us if they could by them from us (who's the absurd one?)Because the Spanish weakly accepted that claim. What did they care? They knew Mexico couldn't manage that land because Spain couldn't manage that land. The Indians managed that land and your repeated claims to the contrary were not serious to them. It's not serious to us. It's not serious.
>that's not a requirement, else the US wouldn't have seeked to buy it from us in the first placeIt's just cheaper to throw a few dollars at dirty Mexicans, which is precisely what we did, than to litigate land claims indefinitely. We're white, we like things to be done right and in an orderly fashion.
>Funded, armed, and oriented by the US against MexicoNonsense. They were fighting you long before we got there or cared about anything that was happening there. They were fighting you in the fucking 1820s. They hated you. They were the first MAGAs.
>, just like the Anglo colonists did with the natives against the French during the French Indian wars or how the Spanish used other tribes against the Aztecs. One has nothing to do with the other. I'm not talking about Aztecs, I'm talking about the Native Americans of the American southwest: Comanche, Apache, Utes, etc. Those tribes hated Mexicans. More than anybody else ever hated Mexicans, really.
>Also, there were Apache bands that fully integrated into Mexico and mixed with others. Apaches-Gentils.Traitors who would've been killed by actual Apache nations.