Britain projected to lose 17% of its millionaires by 2028, what lesson can be learned from this?
>>507077570 (OP)As they say, "Don't drink the semen before it festers"
>>507078100>minus half a million We'll run out of Arab sheiks in London but look at the graph, India will have one million rich saars. Just take those in to compensate and we still come out on top!
>>507077570 (OP)Tax the fuck out of whos left to pay for more rapefuges
In addition to people with money leaving, you’ve also got a lot of people with money dying who have no kids or leave it all to a cat sanctuary. Then you’ve got a huge chunk of those “millionaires” (I’m one of them) who are on there because of property prices, which can no Ionger be measured because the top end of the housing market is about to die on its arse
Then there’s all the boomers who retired on fat pensions that are now croaking it. They spent it all on boat cruises, holiday homes, classic cars and holidays. Boomers love holidays. They hate leaving money to their kids, apart from my parents who are the sole reason I am one of the several million “millionaires” in this country. I doubt there are more than a few hundred thousand people here with more than a million in cash, stocks, fully owned assets that aren’t their only house etc
And they are all going to Australia.
>>507078432You exist as a modern nation and not just some mud hut shit hole because of them jeet. You aren't special just because their government gave you free land. You're the new slave race meant to keep real humans downtrodden
>>507077570 (OP)Oh no, we'll drop from having 3rd most millionaires on that list to the 6th. How terrible.
It'll be a hit to the economy but it's not a big deal at all, so long as the trend doesn't continue.