>>507109383>even if they forgot and didn't noticethey still need to pull enough AoA to put them in a stall
which they don't do
You're implying that they should have pulled the plane up to high enough flight angle to prompt an AoA over 15ยฐ approx...
Thing is that you don't need to pull a high fligh angle to get a high AoA...
AoA is a function between the flight angle and the trajectory of the plane, hence on the take off vid why we see it "taking-off" / "stabilising" / "Going down" all while he keeps the same flight angle.. Just his trajectory becoming "ballistic" because the AoA increased so much due to low speed, the AC wasn't able to maintain enough lift to fly...
Ie: You can fly in a straight line, leveled, and if you decreased power and maintin flight angle while speed is decreasing, you'll have to pull the horizontal stabilizer to maintain your attitude but in doing so, your AoA will increase so much that it will go over around 15ยฐ approx and prompt a stall... This will not be a "dynamic stall" but still a stall, and like what happened to the Indian AC...
I get what your reasoning but you might have an eroneous visualization of AoA, recheck it if you want, it will help clear what you think about tha "take-off" vid...
Italianon is purely factual, and what he said up until now is technically right