>>507099198 (OP)except that nobody ever does their own research and thinks something is malware just because their antimalware tells them it is.
couldn't be that (((someone))) is paying the antimalware vendors to flag repacks as malware because they want people to buy the original games, right?
maybe that's why nobody has ever come forth with evidence of actual malicious behavior originating from such repacks in like ever. it's always the antimalware saying it's malicious based on it being illegal.