Here is the video of the take off and crash in one continuous shot. Do the analysis, frens

>>507099833 (OP)
Pilot probably forget to close the hatch

>>507099833 (OP)
what are plaps on the plane?

>>507099833 (OP)
It's amazing that anyone survives a plane crash when they explode like that. Everyone turned to ashes within 2-3 seconds.

>>507099833 (OP)
lol

>0:04
Can clearly see that they are attempting to fly with a Boeing 737, this plane is well known for falling out of the sky.

Next.

>>507100007
apparently they found a survivor

not enough lift
from not enough speed

>>507099833 (OP)
>overloaded
>unsecured load
>too great angle of attack at low speed
>some combination of jeet errors or incompetence

>>507099833 (OP)
didnt clean all the poo off the landing strip. got stuck in the engine and gummed it all up

classic, loose 1 engine, the pilot pretend it can manage the situation, he think he can just continue climbing, the plane stall, no more lift

>>507100069
crahing this plane....

>>507100007
all you have to do is surround yourself with human meat shields.

>>507099833 (OP)

JEETED

>>507099833 (OP)
Well, it seems that it went down when it was supposed to go up

>>507099833 (OP)
How the fuck does that trigger an explosion?

Looks like it went down when it should have gone up

>>507100108
aren't these planes able to fly on one engine out of the two?

>>507099833 (OP)
They only used half of the runway, that mistake inevitably lead to not having enough speed for a proper takeoff of a boeing 787 with a full tank and ~250 people on board

>>507100187
the plane crashed into a building. fuel tank compressed and go boom boom

>>507100066
>737
retard

>>507100261

after conferring with the ntsb for many hours, we have discovered the problem.

>>507099833 (OP)
Jeets probably thought they could use cow poo as fuel and blessed the plane with it. It clogged the fuel intake causing the engines to lose power

>>507099833 (OP)
No one gives a shit, you ugly jeet
>>>/trash/

>>507100316

>>507100187
>>507100269

The wings are the fuel tanks.

>>507099833 (OP)
>another plane load of pajeets headed to london
BOOM
oh no, that sucks

>>507099833 (OP)
Who cares? Plane was to heavy from all the poo. Next.

>>507100232
Perhaps when they are already at altitude but can't generate the amount of thrust required for takeoff.

>>507100187
Fresh “takeoff. Wings are full of fuel. How do you not after a catastrophic crash is a better question
>>507100232
My guess would be flying/=taking off, but grain of salt

They went down instead of up...must have been high on drugs

Engine failure. Most likely this was something the pilot felt before takeoff but stupid as they were, they pushed the plane to the limit anyway. Plane dont have speed to pull up and the shit falls down.

>>507100161
.COM

>>507100105
>overloaded
How many real vs official passengers?

>>507099833 (OP)
Hand of god to protect London from more pajeets

>>507099833 (OP)
They didn't fly so good!

1. Flaps not set to Takeoff position
2. Failure of Pilot to retract GEAR when low climb rate and decreasing Airspeed was noticed
3. Failure of Pilot to *also* lower the Angle of Attack when low climb rate and decreasing Airspeed were noticed

When I say "noticed" it's also a guarantee that the GPWS was screaming at them:
1. Sink Rate
2. A complicating factor is that it most likely said "Pull Up", which is the WRONG action to take, as described above.
Instead, it should have suggested to raise the GEAR and lower AoA, to stave off impending Stall.

Idiot pilot and co-pilot that skipped checklist

>>507100576
Kek you beat me to it

>>507100069
>>507100142
THEY EXPECT ONE OF US IN THE WRECKAGE BROTHER

>>507100261
>>507100316
>>507100363
So it's brown incompetence again, just kill these retards already

>>507099833 (OP)
>Do the analysis
God saw that they were unrighteous economic grifters on their way to poo up his already hated chosen people - the English - so by divine intervention he did the needful.

Praise be the lamb of God. Praise the Lord.

>>507099833 (OP)
Looks like flaps weren't deployed and the Jeet pilot did the usual newbie mistake of pitching up sharply instead of managing his climb and gaining airspeed to create more lift
Instead he's caused the plane to loose airspeed and then lift, flat stalling into an uncontrolled fall

>>507099833 (OP)
Loses power does not change the angle of attack. Loses lifting force.
Crashes.

The only way why it goes down with the same angle of attack, the reason for going down would be losing lifting force. This can happens when the plane loses power.engine failures.

>>507099833 (OP)
They did not collect enough google card to be able to redeem. Sad story.

>>507099833 (OP)
I'm pretty sure it was the fireball that killed them.

>>507100072
This is what I am saying here.
>>507100821

12 years of flight inspector

>>507099833 (OP)
Plane filled with too many poos at the back.
When plane is stalling the pilot needs to dive at the ground, the pilot was too busy shidding and farding and crying at the moment,
Pilot was on the phone with Indian technical services but he couldn't understand.

Pilot needs to face fears and nose down but his mother beat him as a child but he has no adrenaline control and is stuck in fight or poo mode.

>>507100072
Carrying too much shit.

>>507100108
Your analysis, just like that of all good anons in this thread, is in-depth and sharp. Can you pray tell at what timestamp does the engine lose power?

>>507099833 (OP)
plane went up and then down, instead of up and then more up

>>507099833 (OP)
We can rule out bird strike. The engines are working at the point of take off, which appears to be at the very end of the runway. Pointing towards some configuration or weight error. Fuel contamination is possible but it would have to something specific to this aircraft.

This is always going to be a thing isn't it. No matter how modern everything becomes and how many lessons learned from the past they'll figure out some way to fuck up in the worst possible way.

It was going slow as fuck and ran through the dirt at the end of the runway. Pilot needed to hit the turbo button.

>>507099833 (OP)
Either the jews took control of it remotely, crashing it with NO survivors, OR the pilot was a poopy pajeet. My money is on the former, though.

>>507100783
Yep, likely would have been fine if he didn't pitch up so much.

>>507100821
>Loses power does not change the angle of attack. Loses lifting force.
Correct, as long as all things remain equal
1.Power for Altitude
2.Pitch for Airspeed

>>507100675
This is probably closest to the truth. Clearly no flaps set.

>>507100261
If that turns out to be true, and not an ADSB-error, that would be an insane amount of incompetence with both pilots.

The pilot pooped on the controls, and they couldn't confer with ATC for help because both parties just went back and forth trying to scam each for other for Google Play gift cards

too much poo in the fuel tanks clogged the engines

>>507099833 (OP)
Flaps no worky.

>>507100675
>Flaps not set to Takeoff position
Don't talk bullshit. You can not see that in that video.

>Failure of Pilot to retract GEAR when low climb rate and decreasing Airspeed

Landing gear is retracted when the plane is at least 600 feet up in the air

>>507100576
Indeed, and while it's harder to sneak onto a plane, baggage check-in and ground crew can overload a plane pretty easily. The check-in counter is taking bribes to ignore overweight bags, overweight cargo accumulates, flight envelope is exceeded in key parameter.

Though the angle of attack is so great and the pilot never noses down, indicative that he didn't understand flight nearly as much as he understood holding needles and numbers in the 'right place' for a 'normal' climb out.

>>507099833 (OP)
The brown box on this one will be interesting to hear.

>>507101352
>>Flaps not set to Takeoff position
>Don't talk bullshit. You can not see that in that video.
You can 100% see exactly that in both videos I've seen so far.

>>507099833 (OP)
Belly flopped that plane.

>>507099833 (OP)
Engine flameout on ascent, possibly a bird strike. Looks like the left engine, maybe.

>>507101352
>You can not see that in that video.
Nigger, open your eyes.

>>507099833 (OP)
I will say no pilot mistake. Engine failure . he could not do anything because no time to do anything.

>>507101027
He just made that up. An engine failure at full power would lead to a visible roll and yaw towards the left engine, until the pilots correct. I don't see that.

>>507100072
yeah. its climbing quite happily and then quits. probably engines quit. retracting flaps too soon maybe a factor but probably not the case. horrible

>>507099833 (OP)
That explosion is literally the most beautiful thing I've ever seen in my life

>>507100316
>high-elevation airport like Dubai
ChatGPT is retarded

>>507101505
*dead engine

>>507101483
This shit is not visible. Too far away too low quality.

>>507100316
So...this the rare time it wasnt boeings fault? These are the highly qualified indians were bringing over on h1b?

>>507100261
but it had a good rate of climb. something changed that and it came down again.

>>507099833 (OP)
pilot was letting his cousin drive while he slept.

>>507101281
It's just another take on what possibly happened ,could be a malfunction for all we know, only the black box will clarify the situation.

>>507099833 (OP)
He didnt fly so high

>>507101465
Yeah coz it goes to the left. But it could be a drone too. Not only a bird.

>>507101304
>The stewardess on an Indian flight really is just a dark, skinny pajeet who scams you instead of serving you.

>>507100675
>it was probably telling them to pull up instead of lower aoa
So jeet coding plus jeet pilots = ??

>>507100107
>Tower Saar, mayday, we are appearing poop gummed! SAAR!
>AAAAAAAAHHHHH!!!!!!!

It was gravity

>>507099833 (OP)
It's hard to tell but the takeoff looks pretty slow and cumbersome to me.

>>507101279
>Clearly no flaps set.
What's curious to me are two key things:
1. Why didn't the Flight Director(s) issue a Warning

"Takeoff Flaps not set!"

2. Were they using the "Automatic" Power Detent on the Autothrottles, and DID they attempt to override to Max Continuous

>>507101352
>Don't talk bullshit. You can not see that in that video.
You may be correct
I've seen "suggested" Flaps 15 for heavy load, but normally its 5
>>507101352
>Landing gear is retracted when the plane is at least 600 feet up in the air
Bullshit.
1.Positive Rate
2.Gear Up
is the fucking standard

Go ahead and cite a source that indicates otherwise (which MAY be true for this airline, per their procedures)

>TERRAIN TERRAIN WHOOP WHOOP
NOO YOU ARE THE BLOODY!

>>507099833 (OP)
It wasn't Boeing's fault. All the poo that was in the aisles instead of in the toilet slid backwards and accumulated in the back of the plane as the plane took off, ruining the weight distribution and causing the plane to crash

>>507101826
Gottem. Feds should pay you out for solving the case.

Yep, happened to me in my flight sim when I pulled up too early and stalled out.

Pilot Error.

Just like Rafale fighter.

>>507100261
FR24 says they did backtrack to the end of the runway.

They didn't fly so good

>>507100232
When you already have a lot of forward momentum and altitude, which they didn't have at takeoff. That's what I'm guessing.

>>507101713
>So jeet coding plus jeet pilots = ??
No.
It's a "standard" alert from the Ground Proximity Warning Systems, and AFAIK it's universal.

my call:
engine didnt run at full throttle even though the throttle was moved to maximum position, because some jeeted software had a bug and reduced it to 10% for safety

>>507101867
>PULL UP PULL UP PULL UP
DON'T TELL ME WHAT TO DO BLOODY BENCHOD!!

>>507101872
Unironically possible for air india

>>507101958
Perhaps they’re wondering why you would eat curry before flying a plane

>>507101872
There's a non-zero percent chance that poop was involved.

>>507100072

I'd say crosswind its pulling right as its going left slows down and stalls out of the sky, moar power needed

>Pajeets in charge of aviation

>>507099833 (OP)
>do the analysis

They redeemed

/thread

>>507100675
>pilot had 8200 hours of flight experience
is this really it?

>>507101621
didnt have enough speed. it had good climb until the rate of climb outpaced the speeds ability to maintain flight. thats why it looks like it stalled out, because it did.

>>507100001
when i fuck your fat mother in the plane bathroom
plap plap plap

>>507100072
Survivor said he heard a loud bang right before they started to go down

>>507102469
Septic tank imploded

>>507101521
>horrible
hello saar. nobody cares about burnt jeets

>>507101993

Yeah. That's how so many of our companies are turning to complete shit.

>>507102469
If it's boeing, I aint going!!

>>507099833 (OP)
Pilot error? I have zero idea, I'm asking. Would there be a reason why the pilot kept the nose up even while losing altitude? It seems like you would want to take as much control of the plane as possible if there was a malfunction. It probably wouldn't have helped, just seems like your options for putting it down in some other way would increase by leveling off at least.

>>507101145
>Pilot needed to hit the turbo button.
I've never been that confident ih the new climate friendly solar-powered engines.

>>507102443
well sure but what was the cause of the stall. thats the whole question

>>507100069
They did

>>507101872
Most believable explanation

>>507100007
Couldnt some real heroes try to jump out if the plane was going slow while descending in the crash?
I mean at that point you would need real courage and adrenaline but you could take your chances especialy trying to jump into trees or a house or a smother surface instead of taking your chances int the fiery ball of death. But you would need a big precense of mind to even think about opening the hatch and jumping out espeacialy if we are trained to trust autorithy and the pilots.

>>507099833 (OP)
Shitskin cargo loaders didn't secure the cargo so it all shifted to the back making the weight of the plane too back heavy, it couldn't bring the ass up to level out and the shitskin pilot didn't know how to handle it and stalled out giving too much power.

>>507100069

>>507100069
they found an absolute bullshitter who is claiming british citizenship

Indian "maintenance"

>>507099833 (OP)
Not enough poojeets died, a real tragedy

>>507102011
I think the correct thing to do in a loss of thrust situation would be to pull down to get some airspeed to try to glide.

>>507099833 (OP)
That's for sure chinese electronics attack. I worked in India airplane controller and we never crashed except when female pilots training.

Pilot was distracted by his phone. He was watching a youtube video "How to fly a jetliner - tutorial (hindi subtitles)

>>507101352
>can not
>600 feet up in the air
???????

Only the black box will tell you now for sure, a sharp drop in velocity vs RPM will mean engine problem.

>>507099833 (OP)
Flaps not flapping, the pajeets probably increased thrust causing the opposite effect. Instead of going up the aerodynamics forced the plane down.

Thankfully no humans died during this event.

Why was a plane in India going to London? Like why. Should've stayed home.

>>507099948
yeah the poo hatch

>>507100001
Meme flag is asking about flaps.
They do seem absent.
It would partially explain what is happening, lack of power could also be a culprit.
Dirt everywhere and fuck it mentality helps.

>>507099833 (OP)
ive read enough shitposts on /n/ from previous crashes to say this was stalling due to Poojeet incompetence

>>507101020
Actually you can see it nose up from too much weight in the back. My guess is they didnt balence the people and put too many fat indians in the back, causing it to stall

>>507103259
Fuck I didn’t even think to check /n/ gotta be some good shit going on rn

>>507103207
ahh this happens to me in KSP
cpt pajeero must need to play more sims

>>507099833 (OP)
Raj, you're breaking the plane!!!

>>507099833 (OP)
Shut up jeet

>>507103128
do we know yet if the pilot was a woman? that was my first assumption.

>>507103490
All pajeets are women, even the ones with a peenis

>>507103166
>Only the black box will tell you now for sure
Obviously.
>a sharp drop in velocity vs RPM will mean engine problem.
Ostensibly, if this occurred, it was affecting BOTH engines, as there is no noticeable Yaw, which would be present during single engine operations (unless our hypothesis is that the PIC was the BEST fucking Vmc pilot who ever lived, and insta-counter-ruddered that heavy)

>>507099833 (OP)
overpacked flight
it was an immigration flight to london, so it was loaded full of cargo and extra passengers

>>507099833 (OP)
Indian boys didn't pedal hard enough.

apparently their plane was scammed by microsoft tech support

>>507099833 (OP)
Over two hundred British citizens are gone in less than a minute, just like that?

Planes is hard job

>>507100675
I agree with this assessment but I suspect weight distribution being rear-biased, premature takeoff, and a likely headwind are also a factor affecting AoA and climb speed for this take-off. We can't see what's in front of the pilot but there may be some tall buildings/towers that made them pull back early due to clearance concerns. In the moment they needed to do the counterintuitive thing and stay low, but the monkey brain panic killed them instead. This is why you need white male pilots.

>>507102882
You can't open up the doors during flight

>>507100072
Pilot here.

Engine blew up and he didn't have flaps down so the other engine couldn't spool up in time. that's why they sloooowly descend, because the one engine left over is slowly adding power but not fast enough. he should've left his flaps down because he did not have positive trajectory for long enough.

>>507104084
Put me on a boeing and watch me.

>>507103791
have you tried turning it off and on again?

>>507103245
Fucking hell, this has me laughing way harder than it should.

>>507100007
We Indians are fucking survivors bladdy plane crash no big deal

>>507099833 (OP)
it lost all power you stinky fucking jeet, notice how the wheels never fully retracted, i'm guessing faulty software which led to power loss like the jeju island korean plane crash->APU loss->hydraulics loss, or less likely a double bird strike + apu failure

The pilot wasn't completely sure of the plane's takeoff and was awaiting vital takeoff instructions from someone on the ground, but it was early in the morning and every channel they switched to all they could pick up was interference with cheery "Good morning sirs".

>>507104098
so maintenance issues combined with pilot ineptitude?

I don't know but I think when planes stall they fall really fast

>>507104098
Fucking bladdy it was pilot error through and through majestic Dreamliner didn't crash until now superpower number 1 in evryrhting fuckignnfelal

>>507099833 (OP)
Poo

>>507104262
You saung what bloody you zcusing pilto erkrr????? You fuckkgnuf

>>507099833 (OP)
Dr. Chud here
My diagnosis is melanated female pilot

>>507104328
that was all because some retarded nigger, literally, didn't secure cargo which broke loose, crashed through pressurized bulkheads, and severed all rear control which put plane in an uncontrolled ascent...think his name was tyquarious or some shit, he got indicted for it iirc

>>507099833 (OP)
Pilot error.

>>507099833 (OP)
was expecting some cows to come walking across the runway

>>507104328
That was cause the gear in the plane slid to the back causing the plane to fall.

>>507104404
that ain't pilot error unless the nigger throttled down once he got past V2, wheels looked like they stopped half way to retracting which would indicate a power loss from both engines and APU you stinky fucking ESL nigger

>>507100072
>from not enough speed
This.

>>507099833 (OP)
Shouldn't the landing gear be retracted pretty soon after takeoff?
Obviously pilot error and even maintenance issue, but people will blame Boeing.

>>507103245
seriously guys, enough with the poo jokes. this is a serious tragedy.

>>507104593
lol it did more than slide, cargo punched clean through the pressurized bulkhead severing tail control

>>507104328
guy thought he was in a rocket

>>507104531
>>507104593
I was just making the comment that it looks like planes can fall very fast when they're stalled. In the video from this crash, it kinda looks like the plane stalls with it's front facing upward.

There's just not much recovery time and I don't know what they're supposed to do if it stalls right after take off

>>507102443
Which is either from both engines stalling at the same time, or both pilots pulling back on thrust.
It'll either be really bad for Boeing, or really bad for pilots.

>>507104770
wheels were partially retracted, looks like power outage
>>507104811
>enough with the poo jokes
no

whoops wrong emoji

>>507104811
>this is a serious tragedy.

HASAHAAHAHAA
calm your shit.

>>507104811
This I’m sick of this shit

>>507104875
o ya, they drop like rocks for sure...when your that low and full of fuel it's game ovaries

>>507104718
Hahaa JEET APOLOGIST
Everyone knows the pilot fucked up hahahah bladdy fuckingbladdyyy

>>507099833 (OP)
The pilot went to the loo as soon as the plane left the ground.

>>507099833 (OP)
>flaps retracted
>high air temp
>takeoff from mid runway
>didn't retract gear
>piloted by poos
Poolet error.

>>507105040
Based superior Anglo IQ take.

>>507099833 (OP)
Pilot taking off way too slow. Did he forget to engage the boost thrusters?

NEW VIDEO.
https://x.com/krok7517100/status/1933089931347345596?s=46

Supposedly, Air India ordered their 787's with GE engines.
https://archive.ph/XHGFi
>Air India selects 40 GEnx-1B engines for its Boeing 787s

Compare the Takeoff Power sound (unknown which Derated Setting was in use here * in this case*, and IF they tried to go Max Continuous)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CIGXtjHrmQY

Audio would need to be analyzed, by one of you autists (keeping in mind the comparative distance and equipment to record, of course)

>>507101505
There is a slight apparent yaw to the right, but that may just be camera parallax. I concur there is not much evidence of an engine failure. My money is on yet another group of pajeets that cheated their way through pilot certs and were not intellectually capable of operating an airliner.

>>507105040
This is what we'll learn. Angle of attack was too great, plane was overloaded from the baggage-counter taking bribes, and the flight envelope was exceeded, leading to a crash.

The loss of power fags are full of shit, the plane is powered all the way down but it didn't have the airspeed or engine performance to generate lift in that takeoff configuration. There will be more than one jeet at fault here, and taking of bribes will be an aspect.

>>507105023
lmao groundcrew fucked up you bloody benchoid, found the issue already...crew kept the plane running for over 248 consecutive days without giving it a rest. due to fucked up $8/hour software engineers the planes entire power generation capabilities resets and goes into safe mode if left on too long.

>The plane’s electrical generators fall into a failsafe mode if kept continuously powered on for 248 days.

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2015/may/01/us-aviation-authority-boeing-787-dreamliner-bug-could-cause-loss-of-control

>>507100261
>>507100316
How does this happen? Shouldn't air traffic control be insisting they use the full runway?

>>507105258
you're full of fucking shit lmao...you can see the gears failed to retract...it's obvious as day, but you're a dumb nigger so guess I can't expect you to understand since you can't even tell me how you would feel if you didn't eat breakfast this morning

>>507105262
the plane is used to ferry migrants from india to london, non-stop
flightradar history shows this specific plane going back and forth constantly, dropping jeets off

>>507105407
>gear failed to retract
>jeets failed to retract the gear

>>507105258
>>507105250
this. almost certainly someone had the weight calculations or balance wrong. the pilots set their takeoff with bad data and had little opportunity to recover.

>>507104811
It's a shitty situation, some are finding ways to cope.

THE PLANE WAS KILLSWITCHED LOOSING ALL POWER ON TAKEOFF

HOLY STEAMING SHIT!!!

WHO DID THAT??

>>507102882
>Jumping out of a plane doing at least 300 kmh
Lol

>>507101621
Yes, but without enough airspeed you don't have enough aerodynamic lift, pulling up just creates drag that slows the aircraft so all that vertical speed just bleeds off along with your airspeed.

>>507105435
the one thing everyone can agree on is that a flight between bumfuck Indian city and Gatwick full of Indians crashing is no great loss

>>507099833 (OP)
Some of the news sites are saying that the footage shows that the flaps were in the wrong position for take off. So it's starting to look like possible pilot error.

>>507100783

Flaps were deployed, theres another video where you can see them . Looks like double engine failure.

>>507105511
nigger failed to retract implies that the gear was partially through the retraction process when it was interrupted...how would you feel if you didn't eat breakfast this morning??? serious question you retarded motherfucker

>>507104811
>>507104972
saar

Must be engine failure. Even if there was a problem with the flaps or landing gear, the plane had enough thrust and lift to take off. There had to have been a loss of thrust for it to suddenly go back down.

>>507105620
They'll build a memorial to them at Gatwick. Next time I fly from there I'll leave a loo roll by it in their honour

>>507105707
>double engine failure
i like the way you think swissanon

>>507101956
Then there's a good possibility that they downrated the takeoff thrust out of habit because they didn't bother with the calculations that would have shown that the high air temp would have required a higher commanded thrust.

for all the retards screaming "but they forgot to retract the gears!!!!"
Boeing official recommendations in case of engine failure during takeoff is to not retract the gears as the two panels opening to make room for the gear create too much drag

>>507105736
that's what i'm saying...if it had enough juice to get through V2 then went down my guess is engines too

>>507105620
agreed

>>507105171
Dreamliner has nitrous boost like NFS saar? Wow saarrrrrrrr I am citrus juice
>>507105262
No proof whatsoever of anything like that. Short and simple: the pilot SAAR'd it.

>>507105814
THE GEARS WERE PARTIALLY RETRACTED YOU DUMB FUCKING FROG

>>507105720
There's no evidence that there was any partial retraction underway.

The CCTV video points to a likely dual engine shutdown. The cause of this is the interesting question.

>>507099833 (OP)
>Do the analysis, frens
Not much to analyze here. The plane stalled and fell out of the sky. Took off too soon, nosed up too hard, was too heavy, didn't add enough thrust, who knows without the flight data and voice recorder. You can practically hear the stall warning activate at 0:24 as you see the plane in pain trying to maintain the climb. Not much they could've done at that point though whatever mistake they made they made before the video started.

>>507105544
I guess it could be terrorists wanting to hit uk citizens but unable to infiltrate uk anti-terrorist security.

>>507100261
>>507105380
Fake news

>>507105870
proof??? lmao i have all the proof in the world you kike ass vpn faggot...go take your IBS medicine mordichai

>>507105736
>saar our fuel quality is good saar there is no problem with the fuel. Look at the fuel very pretty. 50% water? No saar I do not understand please do the needful and get plane to london

>>507105899
no

if the thing was working properly then I do not think the flaps would have lead to it stalling and going down so gracefully

it looks slow as fuck

>>507105938
there most certainly is, the most definitive evidence even...it's plainly fucking visible you brainlet...how would you feel if you didn't eat breakfast this morning??? serious question

>>507105380
Some sources say they used the entire runway but the flaps were retracted too soon or were in a bad configuration.So who knows? maybe they exceeded the angle of attack from raising the nose too steeply. It was definitely a pilot error either way

>>507106043
>partially retracted

I don't know why this particular anon is so belligerent >>507106125

>The entire Patel mafia on board
>Killswitched on takeoff

THIS WAS AN INSIDE JOB!!!
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=N3zf9q8mbWs&pp

For everyone saying engine failure, it just seems highly unlikely. Something like that would be obvious before take off. Which leaves the option that both engines failed right after take off, but that would be so wildly unlikely. Like probably millions to one.

>>507106020
Way to out yourself as a visajeet.

>>507100007
he was launched from the fuselage like a bollywood movie

>>507099833 (OP)
No stall , no drastic loss of control
Loss or lack of power for what ever reason.

>>507099833 (OP)
Looks like they just don't have power at all. It a 787-8 and it's not even maxed. So how the fuck do they not have po...

>>507105608
Not to mention a jet engines power curve depends on speed to generate the required power. Rotating too early and in the wrong configuration and with too high and angle of attack and your engines might as well be useless.

I’m glad I’m too poor to fly

>>507099833 (OP)
Flaps 40

>>507106180
if engine failure, it would not have flown gracefully

I blame Boeing.
This kind of reeks of the ANA 787 that had both engines shutdown because of a bug in how the plane handled transitions between flight and ground modes.

>>507100007
>Everyone turned to ashes within 2-3 seconds.
No. It takes much longer to render a body to ash. Its more like chunks of charred meat everywhere

https://www.reddit.com/r/ahmedabad/comments/1l9i1ga/om_shanti_to_everyone/

BEST QUALITY VIDEO AND AUDIO SAAR LOOK AT HER GO

>>507106180
what if their thrust was diminished for whatever reasons (the drag from flaps and gears aside)

>>507106288
In other words a lot of street jeets had a nice lunch menu on offer this afternoon after the harvest was collected and partitioned for the local office jeets.

>>507106284
>reeks
I AM FLYING THE FUCKING DREAMLINER BLOODY BEHENCHOD STEP ASIDE AND LET ME REDEEM THE JUGGERNAUT AIRPLANE

>>507106180
I agree that it seems completely unlikely, but with no flames in the engine, the RAT being deployed and the quick speed loss after managing to actually takeoff, it's the only explanation I see

flight was far overweight, far more passengers than it should have, far more luggage
pilots unaware of total weight
it boils down to corrupt jeet incompetence

what we know so far-
dual engine failure
transponder data cut out during climb, indicating power loss. rat deployed
did not stall
maintained direction and attitude indicating no loss of flight controls
possible fuel contamination

>>507099833 (OP)
My simple theory:
Too much weight at the back of the plain caused a stall.

200iq boss here
Plane is hot weather is cool
Static energy builds up and shuts down one of the engines
Jeet push forward with all power for greater impact

Company cheated maintenance to save money

Dead jeetz go to poo heaven for eternity
The end

>>507106405
Saar have a chamuça and relax <3

>>507099833 (OP)
take-off was fine. neither engines failed, it crashed being levelly plumb.. its seems to be forced down via the pilot.. Unironically "terrorism"

>>507106125
You are the fucking retard... If it was stuck part way they would be crooked. Looks pretty flat to me.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ZwzACp-q9U

>>507106288
Full intact landing saar stop spreading fake news world's best Dreamliner flight ok no crash ok do not redeem?

>>507106297
make a webm do not post reddit links here

>>507106439
if it was fuel contamination, it would have never left the ground at all

>>507106180
These things happen due to a combo of things, in this case it was likely:
1. Overloaded as fuck because Air India doesn't care for safety
2. Fuel quality is probably less than ideal, meaning engines will not produce optimal power
3. It was over 38C meaning the air was thin and hot, which means less engine power and less lift
4. Flaps may have not been in perfectly ideal location, or some other pilot error

If I had to guess right now, that would be my fatal combo

>>507099833 (OP)
Jeet pilot trying to make himself look good by saving gas during takeoff.

LOL I could just see it now. A jeet pilot and his jeet boss.

>SAARR
>SARRR WHY YOU USE SO MUCH GAS?
>MY BUDGET IS TOO HIGH MY BOSS WILL FIRE ME
>YOU USE TOO MUCH GAS BLOODY BENCHOID
>YOU DONT NEED IT
>ONLY 50% POWER SAARR?
>YES SAAR
>I VILL DO IT SAAR

CRASH lol.

SAMIR LISTEN TO MY CALLS YOU ARE WRECKING THE PLANE

>>507106480

We can pilot saar, don't redeem the landing gear after v1, don't redeem the flap

Ramesh I said do not redeem the flaps!!!!

>Famous turd last word

>>507099833 (OP)
aerospace engineering was meant for whites only

>>507106587
kek

>>507100232
1 Engine is enough to keep on flying and come to a safe landing but your climb rate is very limited.

>>507106180
It's not an engine failure unless the stars aligned to perfectly calmly fail both engines at the exact same time with zero physical issues. There were no external signs of engine damage and there was no asymmetric thrust. There's only a few things that could do that, fuel starvation or wiring fault perhaps. It looks far more likely that the plane just couldn't maintain the climb due to weight or thrust and they didn't try to correct for this.

>>507105707
Well, there's no sign of a compressor stall and there is evidence of the engines running at V2 as they kick a cloud of dust into the air. What are you proposing happened?

>>507106525
You don't want to hear the RAT go WHUIRRRRR and the plane blow up with a very bassy BOOM on impact?

>>507099833 (OP)
Either an engine failure or problem with the flaps I reckon.

>>507106180
It's very rare but has happened before in a Jetstar 787 due to fuel contamination. That managed to land safely as it was only temporary. The plane crashed within seconds here so the pilots simply didn't have time to recover.

>>507106484
the plane was forced downwards. maybe out of reactive fear or demand. I dont think it had anything to do with the plane itself

The air is made for Sky Kings not street shitters.

Either it's Boeing's fault and America gets memed in a time of protectionism or it's the Indian pilots fault and Air India gets sued and memed. win/win

>>507106666
could all fuel pumps fail at the same time?

>>507100007
Tail is safest place to be. survivors of these kinds of crashes are usually seated right back.

>>507106297
Sounds like the engines are off.

>>507106297
That looks like a full loss of power on both engines right after rotation.
That is exactly what it would look like if both throttles were fully closed right after take off.

I blame gravity and you can't convince me otherwise

>>507101826
Based gravity btfo pajeets

>>507106755
>Tail is safest place to be.
very true saar we redeemed the tail

>>507099833 (OP)
Okay who wants to float the rumor it was a Pakistani missile?

>>507106527
not true. this flight flew for 2 hours before the fuel filters clogged due to bad fuel
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cathay_Pacific_Flight_780

>>507105193
Better video here.
They SHOULD have hit the TOGA button
[ Takeoff / Go Around]
https://youtube.com/watch?v=jKGp10hW8SI&t=332

Again, we are comparing with the (relatively docile) sound from https://x.com/krok7517100/status/1933089931347345596?s=46

I suspect that these cocksuckers were using a Derated Power setting, and did not attempt to override it (via TOGO button)

>>507106475
It wasn’t tail heavy and didn’t stall , it would have dropped a wing , it was a controlled decent without power.

what if it was a blackhole?

>>507101864
There is an alarm named takeoff config that will sound if you try to takeoff with the incorrect configuration but its not the first time pilots have ignored it by accident.
Everyone uses detent or flex for takeoff and you should override to toga if the accelerationis shit. Problem is that if you go to toga with a to high aoa it does not matter since the wing will not generate enough lift regardless of power setting.
takeoffs can be made with flap5 (for very long rnws) but most of the times you will need to use flap 15+ since you need to follow noise abatement proc.

>>507099833 (OP)
I have analysed the footage through and came to the conclusion, that OP is a ragging poop flinging faggot and that the plane indeed crashed.
Like and subscribe for more analysis.

>>507099833 (OP)
i think the cockpit was stormed seconds into take off and the pilot tried to make an emergency landing whilst panicking

>>507107015
It took off and blew up in less than a minute and it's all on record so that rules out any opportunity to blame drones and missiles. NEXT TIME BLOODY

>>507107016
ok I misunderstood fuel contamination, I thought it was about fuel "quality", but no I agree that something may have "blocked" the fuel intake of both motors, causing them to flame out, the RAT came out automatically because of the loss of power, and the plane slowly lost speed and after that there was nothing that could be done

>>507106747
They don't need to fail, if the fuel is contaminated they'll just pump an incombustible liquid and the engines will go out anyway.

>>507107007
Fugg imagine you're just chilling, enjoying a fresh bowl of shit and a huge plane crashes into your squalid apartment.

>>507107049
Net zero 2050 saar, why tooo fuul power???

>>507099833 (OP)
Strange that a dude was able to jump out of this.

>>507107096
>Everyone uses detent or flex for takeoff and you should override to toga if the accelerationis shit.
Good post

>Problem is that if you go to toga with a to high aoa it does not matter
Yep.
They made NO ATTEMPT to clean up the dirty config (landing gear), or lower AoA.
This is basic shit.

1. TOGA
2. Gear Up
3. Lower AoA to build Airspeed

>>507099833 (OP)

>>507099833 (OP)
It's an occult sacrifice, and since it's from Indian to London, it's a spell for the good guys

the copilot was obviously too scared to speak up

>>507107142
>be jeet
>has to shit blast a deep one
>see fumes of cool air leaving a gas tank
>has an idea to give birth to God of india
>takes a massive shit inside fuel tank while cold fumes scapes into the indian asshole
>says thank you
>leave
See plane crashing in distance
Think he has super powers now

>>507107292
>Net zero
Amazing to ponder just how many that this shit has killed...

>>507099833 (OP)
well i'd have sympathy but since indian programmers were responsible for the last few of these planes falling out of the sky we can reason that an indian pilot knows as much about staying airborne as an indian programmer.

>>507107246
It smashed in a hostel and took down 50+ more bladdy airplane can't wait ten minutes to crash dying on empty stomach fucking BLADDY

WE GAAN

>>507107206
Sure didn't look incombustible when it hit the ground.

>>507107050
I hear the engines tho.

>>507106730
Just looked that one up, same engines as well, the Kathon FP 1.5 that caused it is banned now but it seems like any crystals in the fuel is bad for those ge engines, if that happened on takeoff they would have had the same result.

Facking bloddy thing gangbanged the building saar I am being gangbanged by Boeing

>>507100007
Let’s not bring up the holocaust.
Poojeets are dead! That’s .000000000001 percent of their poopulation.

"Alright anons, analyze the crash video"

Shit goes up, shit go down.

>>507107050
i think they had power but it was forced down, though agreed

>>507107295
It like an elevator, if you jump up at the last second you will survive
Remember that

>>507107339
Maybe they have set a too high flex temp tough. Even with toga set the ecu will set power following your set flex temp and if its too high you may still have not enough power for takeoff.
I agree that the pilots were tards

>>507107621
This proves 9/11 was an inside job yo

>>507099833 (OP)
I prayed for you jeet bros.
All street shitting aside, this is tragic.
It’s good to see one of you made it.

>>507106297
This definitely tells me that the engines were the problem. It would require the pilots being suicidal to replicate this. It wasn't due to damage and they both failed at the same time so there's only a few things this could be. Either a catastrophic malfunction in the planes systems or fuel problems. They were fucked 100% either way that's an unsurvivable situation on takeoff.

>>507099833 (OP)
Overloaded airplane + wrong configuration + engine failure.

That plane was like a cat,
simply trying to fly.

No thrust to get those sirs,
up into the sky.

When it came time to upwards lift,
the sirs came back down,
in windy drift.

Low energy flights like this,
won't take you very far.

They could've drive further,
and faster, in a car.

>>507103252
Looks like everything was fine until it just lost velocity and started to fall, that implies possibly one engine failure or even both at once. The landing gear was still down. The plan lists ever so slightly to the left before crashing, while plunging. Uneven distribution of propulsion, on one wing not the other maybe. Or maybe turning flaps without enough speed to matter.

>>507101872
Beat me to it.

>>507099833 (OP)
The cargo may have shifted to the back of the plane causing the crash.

>>507104328
Here the pilots tried to counter it.
Stall, this can never happen to a bird.
But the man. We beat the nature. We made the man to fly.
Ahahahahahhaha

>>507107712
>Even with toga set the ecu will set power following your set flex temp
Ooof.
That's a SERIOUS flaw, if true.
TOGA *should* override ALL presets, and provide MAX continuous.

>>507099833 (OP)
Simple case of nowhere near enough speed to produce the lift necessary to keep the aeroplane in the sky. What the fuck? This is abundantly clear look how fucking slow it is going, it's a miracle it got off the ground. Nationality of the pilot?

Seems almost guaranteed it was bad fuel at this point from the videos. Will the airport be held accountable or who's fault is it? Obviously its a third world shithole country so I would expect this but point still stands.

>>507107862

Why are people talking about cargo or load balancing. Do you retards think a plane is like your truck? kek

>>507107862
>The poo may have shifted to the back of the plane causing the crash.
Fixed that for ya.

>>507107582
Sound recording is bad , but it should be deafening at that distance / take off power. I hear almost nothing , sounds like the engines are winding down.

>>507100187
>Fuel cant melt steel airplanes.
It was an inside jerb.

>>507107621
Is that a bathroom ? If so no one died in there thats for sure !

>>507107747
It was our turn to take one and we did it in style saar :(

>>507102863
the only one saved by god is a mexican.

>>507107959

That airport has over 250 planes that leave from there daily according to my google fu. Why would "bad fuel" only affect one plane and not the other ones?

>>507107246
topkek

>>507101872
We shit on the designated streets before takeoff and the next aisle shit isn't due for at least ten minutes so it crashed before we could imbalance it with aisle shit but you wouldn't know that because you're a PAKI from BIRMINGHAM

>>507108080
That was the grace of God that a man walked away from that.

It reminds me of when the plane crashed in Detroit and the only survivor was a 4 year old girl.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northwest_Airlines_Flight_255

>>507099833 (OP)
someone just needs to edit the video so when the plane blows up it's a big echoey fart kek.

>>507100675
>WOOP WOOP SINK RATE SAR
>WOOP WOOP SINK RATE SAR
>WOOP PULL UP BLOODY BASTARD
>WOOP PULL UP BASTARD BLOODY

>>507106297
is that the ram air turbine I'm hearing?

>>507108258
>her whole family was onboard
can't imagine the survivor's guilt she had to deal with

>>507100001
YOU ARE FUCK YOUR MOTHER

>>507099833 (OP)
Looks like the plane just gave up. It’s surprising more planes that fly in jeet air don’t just up and quit in the middle of their work day.

if he lost one engine there would be telltale asymetric thrust before the rudder and rudder trim kicks in. here it seems there is a dip in climb at around 0:27, then it stabilizes and stops climbing gradually, coasts until 0:29 to 0:30 and then drops. attitude seems unchanged. sound would help to check for compressor stall. given the quality its hard to check for the exhaust flow disturbances that are present in compressor stalls or bird strike. looks like engine lost power symmetrically, this happenned one time at heathrow at last seconds before landing due to ice in fuel lines that starved both engines. if fuel was bad, the issue would have been apparent earlier, but that's speculation. cutting engine fuel pumps or idling both engines on the other hand, would probably result in that climb pattern.

>>507107935
Wups it was de rating but yeah the concept is that. This comes from my old atpl books so it should be accurate

>>507108143
Could be a problem specific to those engines, it wouldnt require a full failure at that critical point in the takeoff just a roll back

>>507108647
Yes saar

I tried to time sync it.

>>507106512
>Full intact landing

21 post by this CCP shill with Indian flag.

This CCP shill also posts with Pakistan flag.

pic related- this CCP shill gets caught redhanded posting with a Pakistan flag

>>507105608
so you add power. it looks like the power faded away suddenly. attitude really looked normal to me, nothing out of the ordinary. anyway hopefully the actual flight data will come out so we can see what happened and why. ive flown light aircraft plenty and this doesn't seem to me to be a simple pilot error of trying to climb too quick with inadequate air speed

>>507099833 (OP)
iran did it or jew agent or a glowie of some type, will be blamed on russia or iran, screen cap this post

Boeing

>>507100108
This anon is correct, you can see more exhaust fumes on the left side of the engine as thr plane begins to climb as opposed to the right engine. The plane also begins to shift to the left before losing momentum and descending into it's destruction.

>>507109128
The survivor said he heard a loud bang before the crash. There is some truth to it.

Why are they not as deliberate with these things as the military is? I used to work on C5 Galaxies and they wouldn't even clear them to fly if the crew chief table was missing a cup holder

>>507109109
v+1X2Pat ID
how rare is triple digit same numbers back to back?been here for 12 years yet, i've never seen taht before? also im not ruling out gretta for crashing the plane

>>507108647
>>507108910
bad fuel is the only thing that would cause this, both engines wouldn't just fail at the same time for no reason.

>>507109126
jeets really are uniting around boeing being the problem. just because you landed on the moon doesn't mean you get to shit on boeing too.
https://x.com/raghuvanshi20/status/1933196798405087580

>>507109253
Different sources of funding. The military does not have a profit motive. If the military was a business, they would be out of business in short order.

>>507109353
so there must be a reason then

>>507109253
US-based airliners are typically way more picky about this stuff than shit tier asian airliners. There's a reason that most of these crashes are not from United, AA, Southwest, etc...

plaps 2, pajeet you want more?
No lets keep it at two.

>>507100261
You dumb motherfucker. If the aircraft can roll the ailerons and lift off the ground, it has enough lift to KEEP going up. There was 1,000% a catastrophic failure of systems. Fuel or electricity or pressure.

>>507099833 (OP)
if one of the motors gave out it wouldve tilted to one side. this was an in the cockpit problem

>>507109031
Proof bladdy? Fuck you memeflag

That's it! I'M DELETING ALL MY BOEING AIRCRAT FROM MY MSFS!!