Less 169 indians. I guess it's a good news.

https://www.bbc.com/portuguese/articles/c98pz9x8ge5o

>>507126145 (OP)
hilarous that people are already blaming Boeing for this. IIRC wasn't most of the issues with the 737 MAXs basically 'well the system was too complicated for third world pilots to understand'?

An another one, rolf
>>507126434
Arent boeing planes just now pure indian technology?

>>507126434
Rafale plane destroyed during war = kek french engeeners are bad
Boeing crash during a normal trip : "hilarous that people are already blaming Boeing for this. IIRC... american coping"

>>507127034
This
>clearly not indian fault at all, pure accidental saar

>>507126145 (OP)
remember all "British" citizens that died in this incident have names like "Ranjeet","Punjeet" and "Poosheet"

>>507127034
French and German engineers are fine, but it really depends on the application. You see, people in the US complain a lot about German cars and perceived unreliability. The problem is that the US consumer base doesn't take good enough care of their cars, and that leads to unreliability. Similar thing applies here. Indian companies that cannot preform routine maintenance shouldn't be allowed to operate expensive and very complicated planes with hundreds of souls on board unless they can commit to training and maintaining the plane as outlined in the (probably thousands of page) maintenance and upkeep manual.

>>507127034
>Rafale plane destroyed during war = kek french engeeners are bad
everyone,beside chinks, blamed Indians because it turns out those retards don't even have data-link between their Rafales and AWACS

>>507127417
Perhaps those other engineers were the ones responsible. You all know which ones im talking about...

>>507126434
Their entire company is Indian so it's fair game. The spirit of Boeing (Indians) messed it up.