Is Hinduism the only active Aryan religion?

>>507146554 (OP)

What do you mean? Every religion created by Indians and followed by Indians is an aryan religion.

Whites can never be aryans. And whites can not create their own religions.

>>507146554 (OP)
Like that of other ancient nations, Hindu astronomy is inseparable from mythology.
This particular mythology, however, continues to thrive as the basis of Hindu religion.
In a way, it can therefore be said that, among the Hindus, planetary worship is practiced to this day and not only in an indirect way.
Here I would like to remind you of that passage from the "Linga Purana" which admonishes that:
>"the worship of the planets should be pursued by good men."
Moreover, the reason behind this admonition is the warding-off of evil at times of planetary "harassment."
in these modern times, not many practicing Hindus are even aware of these words, and few, if any, among them actually practice planetary worship, is besides the point.
Like the gods of other nations, Vedic deities are known by more than one name or epithet as so, also, are the planets.
Thus, one of the names for the Sun in Sanskrit is "Arka".
But then we find that three related designations for the planet Saturn in the same language are "Arki"; "Arka-putra" and "Arkatanayah".
Both "Arka-putra" and "Arkatanayah" translate as "son of the Sun."
Arkaja, which means "sun-born" can also be applied to the planet Saturn as so, also, can "Arkanandana".
So, once again, we find the planet Saturn bearing a name which is shared by the Sun

also strictly speaking, Brahma was not a Vedic deity. He more properly belongs to that corpus of Hindu lore known as Brahmanic mythology.
He was proclaimed the first of the Devas, usually said to mean "gods," but which properly translates as "shining ones".
Here it should be noted that the Sanskrit adjective "brahmanya" means "relating [or belonging] to Brahma.
Brahmanyah, however, is yet another epithet of the planet Saturn.

tl;dr Poojeets are also Saturn worshippers.

>>507146820
As Brahmanyah, Saturn can therefore be said to be Brahma's planet.
In fact, while Indologists may find it difficult to accept, Brahma has long been identified as Saturn by certain sages of Hindu religion itself.
these sages consider Brahma to be the "true sun", which is the same as saying that, to them, it is Saturn, and not the present solar orb, that is the real "sun."
Since even these sages can see that this is absurdly not so, we can only assume, on the strength of what we have learned, that this dictum must have been believed to stem from ancient lore.
But how could Saturn have been to ancient man what the Sun is to us today?
As any work on Indian mythology will assert, Surya is not only the name of the god of the Sun but is the most common Sanskrit name of the Sun itself.
There are, however, lines of evidence which indicate that Surya, too, was originally Saturn, the least of which not being the reference to Surya as graha Surya, that is the planet Sun.
as in the case of the Egyptian Ra, Surya is described as having motions and characteristics which do not fit those of the Sun.
Thus, to give but one example, Surya is said to have occupied samanam dhama, which means "the same place of rising and setting."
Everyone knows that the Sun does not rise and set in the same place.
Let me, however, be a little more specific. Surya is also termed Suraj.
But Suraj, again, is yet another name for the planet Saturn.
So that, yet one more time, we can see that Saturn and the Sun once shared the same name as, among the Hindus, at least in Sanskrit, they still do.
another Sanskrit name for the planet Saturn is Grahanayakah, which means "chief, or leader, of the planets."
But, again, Grahanayakah is also one of the names bestowed on the Sun.

>>507146663
Aryans aren't brown though. If you mean europeans can't be aryans you're right but Aryans are whiter than brownoids and semites...

>>507146554 (OP)
>>507146663
>>507146820
>>507148451
the people of alhind stole the orthography of Ibrahim(as) and they make their confused language zoroaster created magic he from bactria he fooled people with harut and marut the people of alhind fooled by the ifrit they double minded people they duality and they confuse people but fools and the knowledge destroyed them

>>507146554 (OP)

>>507146820
>>507148451
We have already seen the Indic Brahma, known as the "father of gods and men," identified as Saturn through the name Brahmanyah.
In that respect, it is noteworthy that Brahma is considered to have been the first of the Devas, which term is understood as meaning "deities," but which, in effect, means the "shining ones," an apt term for heavenly bodies.
It is therefore telling that Brahma, too, was described as having originally been alone:
>"He hovers, alone, above everything."
An epithet, usually translated to mean "Lord of Creatures," by which Brahma was known is "Prajapati".
This is so true that, in the Vishnu Purana, Prajapati is given as an additional name for Brahma.
Like other Saturnian deities, Prajapati was also referred to as "the One God."
Prajapati's identity as Saturn does not solely rely on that of Brahma.
As the 11th century A.D. Arabian scholar, Al-Biruni, discovered during his travels in India, the Lord of Saturn is called Prajapati, pure and simple.
It should therefore not surprise us that, in distinction to Brahma, who was actually his own self, Prajapati was believed to have originally ruled alone.
This we find in the Satapatha Brahmana which, among other matters, states that "Prajapati alone, indeed, existed here in the beginning."

>>507150193
In the Shiva Purana, Brahma is associated with the Pole Star.
An epithet of Brahma is Dhruva.
This is interesting because, despite the fact that we have already seen Brahma identified as a personification of the planet Saturn, Dhruva happens to be the Sanskrit name of the Pole Star.
But, in view of what has been disclosed above, this should not surprise us.
Now, as it happens, in the Bhagavata Purana, the celestial north pole is described as the "highest region of Vishnu."
Again, in the same work, it is stated that
>"above Ursa Major lies what they call the highest abode of Vishnu"
around whom the stars respectfully go round.
The question, here, becomes this: Is Vishnu, like Brahma, to be identified with Saturn or with the Pole Star?
The question seems to be answered for us in the Kunna Purana where it is stated that the Lord Vishnu abides in the place of Dhruva, which is the Pole Star.
In other words, Vishnu was not identified with the Pole Star, it is merely stated that he abides in its place.
But is there any evidence that Vishnu personified the planet Saturn?

>>507151970
Little seems to have been known of Vishnu in the Vedic age, and not much is said about him in the oldest Sanskrit work known to us, the Rig Veda.
In later Hinduism, however, Vishnu comes to the forefront as one of the most important deities together with Shiva and Indra.
In this later mythology, Vishnu is presented as an oft-reincarnated deity who, to use the very words put into his mouth, comes down to Earth "whenever order, justice and morals are in danger."
These reincarnations of Vishnu, called avatars - (literally "descents" will not here concern us. We will, instead, focus on the primal godhead himself who, among various other epithets, is known as Svayambhu, he "who exists of himself."

Of more importance to us, however, is that we have it on the authority of both the Vishnu Purana and the Linga Purana that Vishnu is to be equated with Brahma.
Another epithet of Vishnu is Prajapati, whom we have already seen identified as Saturn >>507150193
According to the Brahma Purana, one of his manifestations is that of Surya.
To this day, a sculptured depiction of Vishnu as Surya exists in the thirteenth century A.D. Temple of Surya at Konarak, Orissa.

Yet one more epithet of the god is Yamakilah, derived from Yama.
the Linga Purana tells us that:
>"the great planet Shaniscara, the slowmoving Saturn, is Yama, the lord of the worlds."
And, to be sure, that Yama was a personification of the planet Saturn is well known.
In the same Linga Purana, Vishnu is made to claim: "I am Kala."
Not to be confused with Kali, Kala is also a name of Yama who was Saturn.
actually, the name Kala itself was that of the planet Saturn.
Additionally, a name of Vishnu is Kalakunchah, derived from Kala.
More than that, another of Vishnu's various epithets is Mahakala, which translates as "Great Saturn."
Yet one more epithet of Vishnu is Darunah, a name derived from daruna, meaning "terrible."
In the Garuda Purana, however, Daruna is given as a name for Saturn.
Finally, the name Shaurih is shared by both Vishnu and the planet Saturn.
There is therefore little doubt that, regardless of what Vishnu's avatars turn out to be, the primal god himself was remembered as a personification of the planet Saturn, which connection, as we have just seen, was tendered through various interconnecting equations.