Does anyone actually have any counter arguments for Zeihan's China collapse theory other then the same "two more weeks" spam?

>>507188994 (OP)
2 more weeks

>>507188994 (OP)
Buy an ad

>>507188994 (OP)
Mainly the fact that these predictions date back to the 1980's and haven't happened.

>>507188994 (OP)
I honestly think it's hillarious, he really is willing to die on that hill huh

Any day now

>>507188994 (OP)
The more you listen to him, the more you realize he's being outlandish on purpose. The way he says things like "the Han ethnicity will be extinct in a decade" makes me think he's a CCP bot that's trying to make Western analysts look retarded on purpose. He talks exactly the way I see a lot of people talk when they just want to play devil's advocate.

Because he keeps saying that China will collapse due to demographics but doesn't say that about Korea or the Mediterranean for example

>>507189741
A lot of what he predicted did happen though. He just really thinks China will collapse too.

Bump

Again?

>>507190034
Maybe, he was right about Russian invading Ukraine but it looks more like he just throws everything at the wall to see what sticks. He's predicted the collapse of pretty much every country and bloc except America and bases his projections on the absolute worst-case scenarios. What makes me think he's doing a bit is the way he doesn't really argue with people who raise opposing arguments or tell him he's wrong, he just sort of moves onto his next point. It's very reminiscent of actual grifters I see who don't really have much conviction in their arguments, they just kind of do it for the sport.

For example, Benny Johnson strikes me as another political talking head who doesn't really believe what he says. He laughs too insistently and he says the sort of retarded, crazy shit he knows the left will pick apart and dunk on endlessly. You could argue everyone is just doing a bit but Benny definitely comes off as a liberal/leftist who's playing a character, taking on the role as a conservative/right pundit instead of someone who actually believes any of it.

Put his videos next to someone like Tim Pool or Joe Rogan or Ryan Kinel and it's night and day. Those other guys might be putting on an act as well but you can tell they more or less believe what they're saying while Benny is almost putting on a cartoonish facade, like he's constantly winking to the left.

If you make a prediction for a long enough time, the odds of it eventually being at least somewhat correct rises above 50%.

>>507188994 (OP)
>Does anyone actually have any counter arguments for Zeihan's China collapse theory
He is his own counter-argument.

>>507190962
I loved listening to Ryan Kinel in 2023 kek

>>507188994 (OP)
3 more weeks

>>507188994 (OP)
He's saying it because that's what boomers and intellingence wants to hear, it pays the bills.

>>507188994 (OP)
But they have LED lights on their buildings!

>>507192945
I think he's warning China that the ZOG empire will bomb them into collapse