>The Talmud (Sanhedrin 54a) explicitly prohibits male homosexual intercourse, classifying it as a capital offense under biblical law
Why are they celebrating pride in Jerusalem and Tel Aviv?

jewish schizophrenia

>>507237495 (OP)
ive been studying the talmud recently so that i can accurately refute the "youre misinterpreting the text" claims. the hardest part about talmud study is that a lot of it is religious "case law". they have their books on religious law and lawyering rabbi commentary about it, disregarding the ethic/moral discussion as its a halakhic and not aggadic.
still studying, but for now, im disappointed that, in some circumstances, they may be right about claiming misinterpretation. if theyre lawyering about their own religious law and discussing cases/defining its usage... its kind of funny in a way, because it means theyre being jews about their own religion. it makes a lot of sense actually. the one religion that would do something like this, where you have to interpret a book from a law lens and not a moral/ethical lens, of course it would be the jews.
really disappointed in coming to understand that. still fresh in my research, im trying to find aggadic links or modern halakhic interpretations of some folio or daf. its not easy.
best example about what im talking about is the 3 year old girl rape thing, ketubot 11a/11b iirc. the most you could question is "why was this a law in the first place", and the context of that is its a written down law from 2000 years ago where a lot of the world had similar caselaw/legalities regarding marriage and arranged marriage for children that young.
thats an extremely gay and copium filled answer. i hate it. but, it looks like thats actually how it is. so you cant use ketubot 11a/11b against them, except for questioning why they dont have specific aggadic text referencing it and condemning the practice. they may but i cant find it, best i can find is that they have aggadic text stating its already forbidden in multiple places, so why muddy up halakhic and aggadic text?
im hoping to find some evidence that isnt so gay and jewish. i still feel like this its the "response we give to gentiles". ugh

>>507238683
That’s an interesting pilpul but no one is forcing jews to uphold gross child rape laws.

>>507238982
and no one is forcing them to uphold the death to gentiles who study the talmud in sanhedrin 59a either, no poskim rule that way afaik. and the modern cope they use is "its not physical death goy, its a divine punishment in the afterlife, we cant touch you!"
simultaneously, theres "interpretations" that say its fine goy to study it. some say its fine if they just study the 7 noahide laws. some say that its ok as long as youre not trying to make a new religion or "lawyer" the jews with it or something.
shits very hard to get concrete answers from. this research will take me a very long time. i dont accept/agree with other big research ive read on this, though their sources are helpful, as they dont do a super deep dive into the jewish schizophrenia to actually understand what they mean by "youre misinterpreting the text".
ive concluded that this is the only true way to combat jewish tricks. you must use their own pilpul against them. their own books. is this really how they interpret it? is it just what they tell the gentiles? how many view or at least dont decry "extremist" interpretations (10% may accept/40% may not say anything against it, but i got those numbers from chatgpt and cant back them up except for the haredi being 10% of the jews in israel and the dati being another 10%).
its required but i forgot to say earlier: i denounce the talmud. Christ is King.

Iran is no different, it's a degen capital of muslim world.

>>507239562
Just give a flower to a jewess

>>507237495 (OP)
Because it's the deadliest sin and most powerful type of demon.

>>507239990
my wife is a mischling from her fathers side so no true jewess. best i could do is have us heil each other for fun and got her interested to read and started mein kampf

/pol/ goes 1 day without obsessing about trannies challenge : impossible

Bibi is an athiest.
His son, yair, who lives in Miami, is gayer than a lemon party.

"jews" are not a monolithic entity

>>507237495 (OP)
Because they have a loophole to trick God's judgement that if the balls don't touch, it's not gay.

>>507237495 (OP)
>Why are they celebrating pride in Jerusalem and Tel Aviv?
The Talmud is only a recognized authority by certain branches of the religion.
The Talmud is a collection of debates. It's rabbis and other prominent people discussing how to interpret the laws of God. Therefore, it stands to reason that it's questionable, since it's nature is that of a debate.
Israel has western-like laws, under which rights as free speech and freedom of religion are enforced and respected.
>>507238683
>im disappointed that, in some circumstances, they may be right about claiming misinterpretation
The biggest, most valid criticism of the Talmud is that it's not God's word. It's the interpretation of it.
Despite the figures of religious authority being necessary and important, they do not have the power to interpret the word of God. Opening this door means opening yourself to the possibility of degenerating and corrupting the message itself.
>thats an extremely gay and copium filled answer. i hate it. but, it looks like thats actually how it is. so you cant use ketubot 11a/11b against them, except for questioning why they dont have specific aggadic text referencing it and condemning the practice.
yes.
at least you had enough IQ to research things on your own.
You still hate the jews and how "gay" this is. But seem to acknowledge that most mainstream criticism of it is fucking retarded, taken out of context and unfounded.

>>507242505
>The biggest, most valid criticism of the Talmud is that it's not God's word. It's the interpretation of it.
another yes and no. the mishnah is claimed to have been given to moses as the oral torah that was forbidden to be written down, until the destruction of the second temple and the purge of a shit ton of jewry. they had to figure out how to be jews since theres no temple to sacrifice at, and they wrote down the mishnah to not lose the oral torah, since the romans could purge them again at any time.
so is it God's word? about the mishnah, yes and also no. the gemara is definitely no, but its just lawyering about how to interpret gods law, which is what the catholic catochism and didache do. i dont know enough about the mishnah to say for certain now whether it should actually be considered God's word or not.
>taken out of context and unfounded
whats actually not taken out of context is some of their passages about jesus. they definitely do try to cope and tell goyim that "oh well there were a lot of figures with that name around that time!" lol yeah, sure buddy. some of the daf bashing jesus or mary read exactly like a reddit thread, its uncanny and funny.

>>507243258
i forgot to capitalize Jesus, i am sorry

>>507237495 (OP)
kek if you type talmud in lookner's chat it's like a 20 second timeout

>>507243410
use the words "misnhah", "gemara", "rashi's commentary"

>>507237495 (OP)
their religion is whatever they say it is, not what god says it is
https://www.brighteon.com/f97089e5-dac9-447e-8bf3-6ea1ef28dbae

>>507243306
you seem fairly intellectually honest. which I think is worthy of respect. good for you, anon.

>>507237495 (OP)

Being a cuck of some Jewess is just as bad as being a homo.

>>507237495 (OP)

>>507243258
>whats actually not taken out of context is some of their passages about jesus
On a related note some anon posted this a while back, and a straightforward reading and understanding of first century history tells me that Jesus’ crucifixion occurred at about the same time that this is talking about God not accepting temple sacrifices anymore. From what you’ve researched, is that accurate or is there more to it?

>>507237495 (OP)
They don't actually believe in anything other than "feeling good" by satisfying the demons that possess them (engaging in unnatural and depraved acts). Sodomy is just one of these.

>>507237495 (OP)
It's fine as long as you violently murder a chicken afterwards

>>507237495 (OP)
What about female faggotry? I think dykes are even worse for society.

>>507243696
i decided that if im going to say shit about the jews, its going to be the truth that the jews cant refute. and if they try, ill beat them at it using their own books and game
i want to know the truth. one of my goals with this research is to find ties or references to remphan/chiun. while researching, im using all the translations i can come across, including translating the hebrew/aramaic. if remphan/chiun exists, i will find it. if not, besides Acts 7:43, then i cant endorse the saturn memes anymore
>>507244247
indeed. they even skip Isaiah 53 nowadays to not give "confusion" since it sounds a whole lot like Jesus. yes, the mesiah was supposed to come before the destruction of the second temple. some jews tried thinking it was simon bar kokhba, and look what happened with that. the interpretation you stated is the one i hold and i think its cope that they dont see things that way.
to directly answer you, i havent researched their stance on this or how they view that time, so i cant answer you. everything ive said on this is just from what i already know or have learned, but not from their own sources yet unfortunately. thats on the research bucket list.

>>507245122
I disapprove of your motivations. But the honesty is still good.
So I'll take it.

>>507246497
the main underlying motivation is that i dont want to believe lies about the jews designed to make me hate them. if theyre truly that bad in their liturgy, we dont need lies. besides that, personally i want to find remphan/chiun, or the lack thereof.i also want to see if i can get hard evidence for "what jews tell themselves" answers vs "what they tell the goyim". only hard evidence that i can cite, though. isnt worth anything if its just a feeling or a random reddit post.

>>507245122
God bless your efforts. It’s a rabbit hole of utter insanity and rejecting the obvious in favor of what they want to hear
>Isaiah 53
They also got assblasted at Daniel and moved his book from the “prophets” section to the “writings” because he had the nerve to write down exactly WHEN the Messiah would come and it’s pretty damn close to Jesus doing his thing. Like, how much more obvious does it need to be? Isaiah said the virgin (and no, it’s not just a “young lady” because that’s not unusual) will conceive and bear a son, Micah said he’d be born in Bethlehem, and then you have all the stuff about how he’d be rejected by his own people and unjustly executed, but it’s a sacrificial offering for our sins and he’d rise to be exalted on high. What else did God need to say for them to get it?

>>507247110
>What else did God need to say for them to get it?
i agree. i dont know how long it will take me to feel like ive sufficiently researched enough. im gonna need to make a schizo pinboard at some point

>>507237495 (OP)
A lot of jews arent really all that religious