FOR THE GLORY OF SATAN, OF COURSE!

>>507269953 (OP)
The Pike letter is fake and gay and has memphis-misraim subversion written all over it, just like the protocols and alta vendita

They dont like this thread staying up long so here is a bump ig

>>507270695
Of course. It just so happens that the ass fits the bucket exactly. Pure coincidence. Totally fake and gay.

>>507269953 (OP)
I don't think Pike considered Lucifer and Satan to be the same guy.

>>507270695
Its funny how this "fake" stuff like the Protocols of Zion ends up being true. If its fake yet correct, what does that make it? Where did it come from? I always see people like you (subversive cattle) quick to try to disillusion people with texts such as this yet when I ask you where this fake creation came from and who the founder of the document is you grow silent and shy away from the topic.

>>507271319
It was indeed the Catholic Church that at some point turned the "bringer of light" into the "adversary". But that doesn't change the current situation or the public celebration of satanic symbolism at all major events.

why would anyone else fight in a war between islam and israel?
it's not a world war when a bunch of brown people in a tiny strip of land blow each other up

>>507269953 (OP)
Test

>>507269953 (OP)
I just wish he didn't describe the new philosophy that will take over as "luciferian" since it feeds into christkike shit. We shouldn't embrace any made up characters from the bible.

>>507271319
I've actually read Morals and Dogmas by Albert Pike as well as theosophical writings. To them it just meant a certain concept / archetype of illumination.

>satan flew those bombers time and again over german cities

i have doubts about this..

>>507271845
The agency let the Jews seize monopolies of power everywhere, so that every nation in the world today is administered by secret societies and secret services, above all, of course, the Mossad. Through their influence they will involve every nation in the world in their artificial conflict. To the point of total exhaustion.

>>507271909
This is not a test. It's happening.

>>507271203
>>507271687
The fact that it rings true doesn't contradict the source being fake
In fact, that's the very essence of masonic well poisoning
This stuff is literally tailor-made to force intelligent people into the company of raging retards like you

>>507271998
>we

>>507272442
What criteria does a "source" need in order to be recognized by you reverends? Does it have to have appeared at least once in a newspaper owned by a Jew? kek

>raging retards like you
The very fact that you are verbally attacking instead of neutrally revealing your alleged knowledge disqualifies you for this discussion.

>>507269953 (OP)
For everyone claiming that it's fake, I'd love to see something to the contrary. Some fag happened to predict 2 (possibly 3) events so accurately decades in advance. Explain that shit. Or be a kike and don't.

>>507272442
My point yet hasn't been refuted. You attack yet cannot answer the simple "If it is fake, tell me where it comes from. Where is the source of the doctored photo?" Who created the fake "masonic" text? Who created the Protocols. You cannot convert people to believing you labeling something as fake without a source. Anyone can claim something is false but you provide less than no evidence as to it being false. Especially with the messages in such documentation ringing true. Call me whatever you want you are the dumb one here as you provide less than 0 evidence to the contrary and my questions stand tall for everyone to see while you fumble your own views. My question poses criticial thinking. Your avoidance of the most basic of questions tells me you have another agenda.

To find whether or not this is true one must compile evidence for skeptics.
Most people on this board probably dont even know what or who Pike is.

>>507272940
>Does it have to have appeared at least once in a newspaper owned by a Jew? kek
You cannot find the Pike to Mazzini letter anywhere before WW2. Go on, show me an even remotely plausible source from before WW2, beyond the magically appearing museum letter
>you are verbally attacking instead of neutrally revealing
Nope, I wasn't even attacking you, just exposing and deconstructing classic masonic subversion
'Raging retards' was my neutral reveal. The depth of the contempt I actually feel for the likes of you is pretty much beyond words

One must also account that perhaps evidence may have been tampered with or destroyed to hide "some truth". I dont know truthfully.

>>507273174
>"If it is fake, tell me where it comes from.
I literally told you where it comes from you absolute dunce

>>507269953 (OP)
Kek. What a faggot kike
>>507270695
>protocols are fake
Hello Jew

>>507273595
You didn't explain shit, I asked a question and you are vagueposting remphan demon sigils. Where is "document cited 1837 from Book of Example, Authored Example". Before you cite your supposed intelligence you need to learn how to answer a basic question "dunce".

>>507273595
Yeah it's just a coincidence Jews like doing exactly what's in the process of zion
>don't believe your lying eyes!

>>507269953 (OP)
Lucifer and Satan are not the same entity. You are very very dumb OP.

>>507274105
>Freemason has entered the thread to defend lucifer
Yes yes we get it. You're a pagan buttfucker.
>LUCIFER AND SATAN ARE DIFFERENT
>APOLLO AND DIONYSUS BRO
>THE DEVIL IS JESUS!
I've heard it all before.

>>507273378
>You cannot find the Pike to Mazzini letter anywhere before WW2.
You'll find it if you dig a little deeper in the dark web (that's where it comes from, because it's classified), but you won't, because you're obviously very aggressively insisting on your point of view, even revealing that this quote offends you so much on a personal level that you go into an attacking defensive posture, as if you have a certain agenda to defend - which seems a bit cynical and ridiculous given the fact that the circumstances described in this quote are unfolding with full force in front of your own eyes right now.

>>507274105
its an inherently pagan concept so there's not much of a difference according to the theology

>>507273870
>>507274604
>You didn't explain shit
I did, but you're probably too dumb for this
Look, the Pike to Mazzini letter quoted in OP simply doesn't exist, as should be obvious from the fact it refers to fascists while dating back to 1871
>>507274604
>it's on muh dark web
Top fucking kek, you better be shitposting
>>507273846
>>507273934
Here >>507272442 I explained the protocols, or any text, can both be fake and true, but I suspect you're already out of your depth

>>507275173
>They are fake
>you're stupid
>no I won't acknowledge its exactly what jews are doing

>>507275173
>can both be fake and true
No. If something is true, then it is true. It doesn't matter whether you acknowledge the "source" or not.

>>507275485
>>no I won't acknowledge its exactly what jews are doing
I did acknowledge this you illiterate mongrel
>>507275708
> It doesn't matter whether you acknowledge the "source" or not.
Yes it does. If it's true but the only source is highly dubious, most intelligent people will conclude it's slander, and the few who know it isn't are now in the company of the idiots who believe the highly dubious source
That's why e.g. the protocols used the quite well known Joly text, and the Pike letter has obvious asynchronicities
It's basically well poisoning with a false flag limited hangout, and it's typical of masonic subversion

>>507276478
Your Jewish schizophrenia is showing