How much did a nigger cost adjusted for inflation?

>>507280795 (OP)
They are a net negative. Why would you even?

the whites didnt pay the niggers for any, they leave out the part where they convinced the niggers to be their slaves if they white boys could take their bbc... obviously niggers never believed another man could handle their dicks

>>507280795 (OP)
bout three fiddy

>>507280795 (OP)
I can't remember the exact amount, but it was about 40 to 50 thousand American dollars.
Basically, about the same price as a car.

>>507281069
^ This

Fuck the Jews
Death to Israel
Ghislaine Maxwell Ain't Iranian
Name All Hasbarabarians
Free America, Free Palestine

>>507280795 (OP)
Changed over time, roughly $30,000 to $60,000 in the US.

>>507280795 (OP)
>How much did a nigger cost adjusted for inflation?
Depends on what the slave does, if it's a retarded slave, they went for as low as 20 dollars, but on average, they went for 200-300 dollars, which is about 14000 dollars today. A skilled slave, like a cook are way more expensive at about 1000 dollars which is 40000 dollars.

>>507280795 (OP)
The number I heard, twenty-odd years ago, was about $13K, which would've gotten you a decent, used car.

A bot told me the following:
>The cost of a slave in 1850, adjusted for inflation, is estimated to range from $14,000 to $240,000 in 2020 dollars, depending on the method of adjustment.
>The average price of a slave in 1850 was around $400, which, when adjusted for inflation, translates to this range. Additionally, some estimates suggest that the price of a slave in today's value could be between $8,000 and $175,000, depending on the method used.

>>507280795 (OP)
20-40 thousand.
They weren't cheap most whites couldn't afford one and furthermore, you have to medicate, clothe, and feed the person.

>>507283731
If your nigger got ill and died could you get a refund, were there contingency plans for this or just end up 30k in the hole?

>>507280795 (OP)
Billions of dollars for the American people.
All because Jews won't pay a fair wage.

>>507280795 (OP)

Jamie, pull up that redpill explaing how kikes owned all the slaves back in the 1800s or something.

>>507280795 (OP)
Lots of people will quote inflation adjusted numbers but in reality it's pretty much impossible to make a proper comparison. The structure of the market was too different from what it is now. It's not quite as bad as trying to compare medieval to modern prices but it was still an incompletely monetized traditional economy where most people were self-sufficient farmers and didn't deal with cash very much or have much opportunity for wage labor.

You can say a nigger cost about as much as a new car today but most people today can buy a new car if they're frugal and work hard. The average person in 1840 would never have nigger money no matter what they did.

>>507284531
You were just 30k in the hole. Which is why slaves being massively abused is made up bullshit. They were taken care of and kept healthy.

>>507285489
The elusive good poast on /pol/

>>507281653
26,000 more for a nigger that can cook? Just buy two of the $300 ones and beat the fucking niggers till they learn. If they refuse, castrate one, and I guarantee the other will learn fast.

Then after he learns, castrate the stupid nigger anyway so he doesn’t make your food with dick hands.

>>507280795 (OP)
in 1800 around 300$ - 1.000$, the equivalent today would be 20.000 to 80.000, honestly i would never pay such amount for a nigger, they would have to pay me to be around them

>>507285489
How many ounces of gold was a nigger?

>>507285590
This is also in evidence from blacks being taller than Whites in 1850 but shorter than Whites today. Nigger slaves worked some of the best land in the country to support themselves and had a social safety net in the form of their self-interested massa. Poor White farmers and urban laborers had their neighbors, but if something happened to fuck them over it probably fucked their neighbors over too. Their kids didn't eat well as kids in bad years, so they grew up shorter and with weaker immune systems, although the cramped conditions of slave living quarters offset that aspect somewhat.

It was still probably better on balance to be a poor White farmer but not nearly as much as (((certain people))) would have you believe. Especially in the south where the plantation economy concentrated property into big estates and people tended to be tenants, unlike the North which had fewer big estates and so people were more likely to own their own land.

>>507280795 (OP)
They were very expensive, the are still very expensive

>>507281175
it's be nice if you could make your cars fuck and get a new car out of it

>>507280795 (OP)
More than you can afford pal

>>507280795 (OP)
From Colonial Beginnings to the Antebellum South
In the 17th and early 18th centuries, the price of an enslaved person was relatively low. In the 1740s in colonial Virginia, for example, a male slave might be purchased for approximately $30 to $50, which, while a significant sum at the time, was considerably less than what prices would become. As the demand for labor to cultivate cash crops like tobacco and rice grew, so too did the value of enslaved individuals.
By the early 19th century, the domestic slave trade had become a major economic enterprise, particularly after the abolition of the transatlantic slave trade in 1808. This cutoff of the external supply of enslaved people, coupled with the invention of the cotton gin and the expansion of cotton plantations in the Deep South, caused a sharp and sustained increase in prices.
In the 1830s, the average price of an enslaved person was around $400 (approximately $13,000 in today's money). By the 1850s, this figure had more than doubled. The average price for any enslaved person, regardless of age, gender, or condition, was approximately $800 (around $25,000 today) on the eve of the Civil War.

>>507285590
Yeah but they could also breed their slaves and end up growing their workforce

>>507285224
>how kikes owned all the slaves back in the 1800s or something.
England's royal family?

>>507280795 (OP)
$2000 shekels roughly

>>507288993

>>507280795 (OP)
Muslimbros?

>>507285489
>The average person in 1840 would never have nigger money no matter what they did.
Which makes the slave owners sending southern boys to die for their property rights the greatest white genocide of all.

>>507286534
Again, the southern oligarchs are the bad guys, like today. The southern white poor are the easiest political demographic to fool of all time. Yes, all time.

>>507280795 (OP)
>How much did a nigger cost adjusted for inflation?
Your Country's Peace and Future that's how much!

>>507280945
Medieval Arabs had a rule all black slaves had to be castrated. It worked.

>>507280795 (OP)
A slave was 40,000 in the 1860s
Since 1913, the dollar has lost more than 97% of its value
Therefore, more than 1.3 million at a minimum

>>507289740
This is wrong, the 40k figure was already inflation adjusted. My mistake. However that was some years ago and the inflation has been insane since (((2020))) so it’s probably more like 60k today in fiatbucks.

>>507289740
doubt

>>507280795 (OP)
>How much did a nigger cost adjusted for inflation?
A female of breeding age = $500 to $1000 each.
A buck of youth and strong body = $2000-5000
Children around $200 to $500.

Extremely desirable specimens sometimes brought twice those figures or more.

About like buying a good used car to a new fancy sports car.

Slaves were EXPENSIVE when average white man was making about $25 to 50 a month!

>>507290393
>adjusted for inflation?
>A female of breeding age = $500 to $1000 each.
>A buck of youth and strong body = $2000-5000
>Children around $200 to $500.
>Extremely desirable specimens sometimes brought twice those figures or more.
>About like buying a good used car to a new fancy sports car.
>Slaves were EXPENSIVE when average white man was making about $25 to 50 a month!

As far as "adjusted for inflation" that's a vague term to use, since all the calculators vary widely.

Take these original dollar amounts and try adjusting them.

>>507280795 (OP)
20-40k. They were expensive farm equipment, the average person could bot afford this. It was only the rich who had them and only to not have to pay white workers the wages they demanded. Even back then the elites used shitskins as cheap labor union busters.

>>507280795 (OP)
$32,736.12
https://youtu.be/oIiBOauHjpI

A nigger free world is the world I want to live in

>>507291278
Shut up Ranjeet

>>507291406
You shut up you fucking nigger monkey piece of shit. Go back to africa.

>>507280795 (OP)
Like twenty grand.

>>507289579
they had the right idea. if we did that we wouldn't have the problems we have now

>>507291543
You're not "Asian" you're a poo. You skin is poo, your country is poo, your entire culture is poo and Pakistan is 100 times better than India in every way possible.

>>507290393
>>507290640
As an example: A carpenter would have made about $400-$500 annually in 1860.

>>507291709
I'm not a pajeet. You however are brown and should kys immediately.

>>507281175
It depended entirely on the make and model of the negro. A middle aged woman? Not much she can do but pick the crops, probably like $5,000. A little boy that can grow up and be taught a skill, let’s say $10,000. 18-40yo men were the work horses so they were around $30k to $40k, so yes they were basically cars

>>507280795 (OP)
slavery is unrealistic. you can't tell me they ever worked or were productive.

>>507291709
even if he was a taxi driver in Calcutta there's nothing wrong with what he said