Anonymous
ID: wBQ6xdi+
6/14/2025, 5:31:22 PM No.507349512
Watching Patel's interview with Rogan.
Patel literally states that he, as a public defense lawyer, represented the worst imaginable child traffickers.
I repeat "Patel was a defense attorney for the worst imaginable child traffickers"
He also mentioned that he employed a strategy called "expert war" as a way to challenge expert opinions with the opinion of other "experts".
He used psychological manipulation tactics to convince Rogan there are no epstein videos.
First he uses "appeal to authority" ( lists his accomplishments ) followed with an aggressive challenge ( "Would i not show you the evidence" ) basically challenging Rogan to call him a liar. Which is rarely replied to with a confirmation in a friendly setting because it would lead to a fight. While he makes his claims about no videos, his eyes do not suggest he's digging for a memory recall instead as a true psychopath he's observing Rogan's response to his manipulative lies.
Then we see the same pattern with Dan Bongino, first building up his "credibility" by "claim to authority" then drops the lie that there are no videos followed with the challenge "would i lie ?"
Dan Bongino is an Israel Firster, literally stated in an interview that his first priority in life is the protection of Israel.
As an SS bodyguard for Clinton and Obama, he must have seen so much of their crimes that's he's technically complicit in them.
How the fuck are these two allowed to handle evidence about child trafficking and political blackmail involving a mossad spy ring,
Conflict of interests anyone ? at the least.
These guys appear to be plants. or lost their balls halfway.
Keep an eye on Pam Bondi, She might be in danger as she's the only one to claim there's a shitload of evidence.
Patel literally states that he, as a public defense lawyer, represented the worst imaginable child traffickers.
I repeat "Patel was a defense attorney for the worst imaginable child traffickers"
He also mentioned that he employed a strategy called "expert war" as a way to challenge expert opinions with the opinion of other "experts".
He used psychological manipulation tactics to convince Rogan there are no epstein videos.
First he uses "appeal to authority" ( lists his accomplishments ) followed with an aggressive challenge ( "Would i not show you the evidence" ) basically challenging Rogan to call him a liar. Which is rarely replied to with a confirmation in a friendly setting because it would lead to a fight. While he makes his claims about no videos, his eyes do not suggest he's digging for a memory recall instead as a true psychopath he's observing Rogan's response to his manipulative lies.
Then we see the same pattern with Dan Bongino, first building up his "credibility" by "claim to authority" then drops the lie that there are no videos followed with the challenge "would i lie ?"
Dan Bongino is an Israel Firster, literally stated in an interview that his first priority in life is the protection of Israel.
As an SS bodyguard for Clinton and Obama, he must have seen so much of their crimes that's he's technically complicit in them.
How the fuck are these two allowed to handle evidence about child trafficking and political blackmail involving a mossad spy ring,
Conflict of interests anyone ? at the least.
These guys appear to be plants. or lost their balls halfway.
Keep an eye on Pam Bondi, She might be in danger as she's the only one to claim there's a shitload of evidence.
Replies:
