So, why are kings bad again?

>>507372837 (OP)
Take a good look at Canada

>>507372837 (OP)
Kings are fine if they are well-trained, the problem is the entire system operates on nepotism and so is doomed to fail catastrophically sooner or later.

>>507372837 (OP)
can be. You want a king of the same faith and blood as the people who's well being depends on the well being of the people.
You don't want Trump who's owned body and soul by the spawn of satan.

>>507372960
Can-of-duh doesn't have a Can-of-duhian king. They have some pedo pervert jew-golem
A king of the faith and race of the people is the only way a kingdom works

favorite logh character?

>>507373059
Seems like the same thing happens in a democracy regardless.

>>507373243
Yeah the HRE survived 1000 years. Yeah Liechtenstein is a successful tax haven. Yeah monarchy is better than democracy, but how can you guarantee you won't end up with a golem king and a tyrannical economy?
>king of the faith and race of the people
Not a rigorous-enough standard.

They aren't if you limit their power some to protect citizen's rights.

>>507372837 (OP)
Only when they impede the wealth expansion of the aristocracy.

>>507373351
The realest dude.

>>507373515
Yes, so both systems are flawed and any society choosing one or the other is choosing a delayed death sentence. An ideal government would be an absolute monarchy where the king is not chosen by blood, but through intense spiritual, moral, military, and political education, training, and testing from childhood at some special facility for the highest IQ segment of the population where only the most outstanding can possibly be the next king should fix that.

>>507373351
yang wenli

>>507373351
ki-ri-chi-eis

Watch LotGH and you'll find out.

Kings are fundamental. The idea of swapping out your national leadership every 4 years is schizophrenic and makes long term strategy and diplomacy impossible

>>507372837 (OP)
There's no public figure fit to be our king.

>>507373600
You can't guarantee anything. You can only set up a government that allows men of God to influence it to the best of their abilities. That's NOT democracy. It IS Kingdoms (sometimes).

>>507373515
What you are describing is an issue directly caused career oriented politicians and not goal oriented public servants, which go figure, the first might as well be monarchism/oligarchism, even though ironically enough the second is generally the best way to ensure ones longevity in the field.

>>507373059
Every system fails eventually. There are plenty of royal dynasties that were very successful and overall good for the kingdoms they ruled. One major advantage of having a king is that they literally own everything, so they have a vested interest in the success of the kingdom. In a democracy, the ruler has no vested interest in the success of the nation, which we're seeing blatantly right now worldwide.

>>507376106
>There are plenty of royal dynasties that were very successful and overall good for the kingdoms they ruled.
Yes, but the system can be improved. Likewise, you could say democracy was very successful for the most of America's history, nevertheless the horrors of the recent decades will likely signal its death knell. It doesn't matter if 3/4ths of the time a system works, it needs to work 100% of the time. A country can survive having a crap leader if the nation itself is prosperous. And a country can survive a catastrophe if the leader is good. Practically no country can survive having a crap leader and a nation in crisis and this eventually always happens.

>>507373351
Rudolf Goldenbaum.
>>507374095
based

>>507372837 (OP)

>>507372837 (OP)
Every democracy is either almost openly decorative lor plainly a facade for some deep state of varied faggotry.

>>507372837 (OP)
They're not.

>>507373351
Oberstein :^3

>>507374435
Not even yourself? Be more optimistic Anon.

>>507372837 (OP)
Reinharto agreed that a constitution was probably the best way forward though.

>>507374095
Correct answer.

>>507373351
Mecklinger i like that hes good outside of being and Admiral and clearly has a life outside of the military

>>507372837 (OP)
Sure if the King is good and benevolent than there is no problem but one good king wont guarantee that his sucessor is a total fuckup that will ruin everything and make life worse
The best dictatorship is better than the best Democracy but the worst Democracy will never be as bad as the worst Democracy

>>507372837 (OP)
even a tyrant king is greater than any democracy.

>>507373351
Taught me what to even look for, and how to understand my enemy.

>>507373059
You can make this argument for every single system of government it isn't exclusive to just monarchy's.

>>507380166
I would take the worst possible king over what we have now. The worst kings are usually incompetent retards that can't do anything.

>>507372837 (OP)
The nature of samsara is that Devas become disinterested and uninvolved in the affairs of mortals. Though they may be infinitely benevolent and unfathomably powerful, their real battle which they all lose is the battle against complacency. And in the absence of Devas, Asuras run rampant.

>>507373351
Oberstein.
>>507377602
He would've turned you into a serf.
>>507379616
Based.
>>507380354
You are Jewish.

>>507380166
The worst dictatorship is an absolute shambles that falls apart and is overthrown quickly. The worst democracy digs itself in like an alabama tick and can't be removed without a bloodsoaked revolution

>>507372837 (OP)
>>507380394

because a king can just remove subversive elements from his country without having to play stupid little games with the law/lawyers/jews/need evidence. A king can single handidly stop kikes by simplying saying 'expel the jews'. He doesnt need to explain himself, he doesnt have to 'catch' them doing anything specific. He can just do it and this terrifies the merchantile class whose power comes entirely from manipulting law.

also:


>billionare funds nonstop protests against trump
>one of these is scheduled on his birthday
>most people recognize it would be a shitty thing to do to protest on his birthday
>subversize parasites run abunch of optics to trick people into protesting trumps birthday by coming up with a bunch of excuses/reason other than it being his birthday

I've seen this protest described as 'no kings' and 'as taking back the flag' and 'to protest wasteful military spending', and every other excuse under the sun. they are just dishonest cuckholds. they are getting paid to embarrass trump, and they get paid more if they can trick others into showing up.

>>507372837 (OP)
Hereditary rule leads to inbreeding and there will always be more mediocre rulers than great ones.
>>507379828
Was looking for this image, thanks.
>>507379914
I respect this opinion.

>>507381251

>>507380394
Yes, I know that. That's why waxing nostalgic for monarchies is stupid. You need a completely new system of government. The Third Reich was fairly close.

>>507380960
>supports nuking a civilian populace to prove a point
>doesn't understand that a proper depiction of one's foe helps them oppose that foe with greater efficacy.
Like your country, you're basically a fucking nigger with white memories.

>>507373351
the honorable Minister of Military Affairs of course

>>507379914
A man of culture.

>>507381440
>supports nuking a civilian populace to prove a point
It was not just for proving a point, retard. Had the attack been stopped the war would've continued for much longer and causalties would've been a lot higher. Reinhard also had no way of knowing how long Yang would be distracted by the coup in his own nation so he had to put down the nobles quickly.

>>507374095

>>507372837 (OP)
I love democracy. I vote and vote and vote and the elites always get what they want and I never get anything.
How many times have Americans voted to stop illegal immigration only to have it continue on like nobody voted? How many times does an issue have 70%+ approval and yet, somehow, it never gets implemented?
Democracy just allows the real rulers to hide in the shadows (while furiously rubbing their hands), while we suckers yell at powerless politicians.

>>507373351
Chad Schönkopf

>>507379914

>>507372837 (OP)
>nigger completely ignorant of the last several thousand years of history

>>507382047
>Die Neue These

>>507372837 (OP)
>>507373351
Favourite Goldenbaum Kaiser? For me it's Julius.
>Wasn't even supposed to become Emperor but did anyway because his faggot nephew fucked off with his favourite boytoy
>Was already 76 years old when ascending the throne
>Extended his lifespan by banging young concubines
>Outlived his sons and grandsons due to his healthy lifestyle
>Ended up getting poisoned by his great-grandson because he grew impatient, dying at age 95
He absolutely could've made it to 100.

>>507372837 (OP)
A king can be good or bad. But at least then you know he is to blame and can get rid of him and replace him with a better monarch.
With the gay (((democratic))) system we have across the West you cant hold any politician accountable because they switch out after 4 or 5 years

>>507382398
based codreanu, shame he was a christian

>>507383543
i liked that one turbo autist who just worked all day and then had a 15 min walk
Even when an entire planet was in full revolt he just ignored the whole thing and waited until the next day to deal with it because dealing with unexpected things isnt in his shedule

>>507373069
Go eat your own shit you commie faggit.

>>507383896
That was Otfried I.
>turbo autist
Might actually be the case considering Rudolf's son was retarded and Kasper was literally homosexual.

>>507382047

>>507372837 (OP)
LOGH sucked and I'm tired of pretending it didn't.

>>507372837 (OP)
Because muh fee fees.

Fortune favors just the bold.

>>507383735
>A king can be good or bad. But at least then you know he is to blame and can get rid of him and replace him with a better monarch.
Except when the king has no real power and is just a figurehead to distract you from the shadow rulers. Then he's just another politician.

This quote also shows the necessity for some "final arbiter". Jews (or any subversive) will ALWAYS find willing traitors in any society to help them.
Without someone to lower the ban-hammer on this bullshit it will invariably grow exponentially. People will realize that being hard working, honest, and moral just gets you screwed instead of rewarded, and then everything falls apart until the society rots from the inside (like ALL non-white countries right now).
In the past that would mean being taken over by a neighboring kingdom, but now, with nukes, I don't know how that would end.

>>507385479
Fuck you faggot! You have no taste! Galactic Heroes was kino!

>>507385479
Nah you're just being a contrarian

>>507372837 (OP)
Fuck the king. Also Americans especially should be ashamed of themselves if they ever unironically endorse the concept of monarchy, go back to your European shithole, the New World is republican clay, I wish Canada would abolish the faggy monarchy.

>>507385047
DNT is still going. Kinda weird considering it's not that popular, at least from what I've seen.

>>507372837 (OP)
lol have you seen the cunt we've got?
He's a complete disaster.

>>507373351
I liked the dynamic between Mittermeyer and Reuenthal but like Mittermeyer the best out of the two. Mittermeyer's wife couldn't produce offspring and they more than willing to honor Reuenthal's legacy by taking in his only child after he died. Don't think Mittermeyer could ever lead an empire but he is a good man.

>democratically elected leader enacting policies he transparently campaigned and was elected for
>king

Liberals are now just flat out treasonous anti-democracy stooges and should be killed.

>>507374095
based. Him and Mittermayer need their own anime..

I'm the Monkey King. I fuck all da and eat bananas.

>>507373351
>>507374095
How come there's nowhere that streams this show? I want to watch it and I'm too lazy to set up torrents again.

I'm the Monkey King. I fuck all da and eat bananas.

>>507372837 (OP)
A king must be strong and wise. And that's it.

>>507372837 (OP)
I'm the Monkey King. I fuck all day and eat bananas.

>>507388426
>torrents
What decade is this? Stop being a rednecked poorfag using trailer park internet and just stream it (for free). It's on Miruro.

>>507372837 (OP)
It's the natural order of man. It's good for the psyche of the people to have this archetypal figure. This is what Trump taps into. The Aryan godking archetype. He cynically misuses the power, though. He's been weighed in the balance and found wanting, by me. No doubt the LORD would agree/agrees. At any rate, that's why the jews killed our princes. Put us in this Platonic republican system. Though, I'm endeavor to work in this system and correct it, until the day of the rope. The Aryan National Socialist ethnostate will be ruled by a benevolently despotic and dictatorial godking. He will control the circulating supply of the unit of exchange, personally and directly, in terms of money supply, so's to ensure that the purchasing power per unit be retained, maximally/optimally, so's to mitigate/eliminate inflation of prices, and so's to promote the economic well being of the people of the land. In concordance with, and, with the guidance of, the Godhead, will he do this/these things, and he will rule, firmly, but fairly, unfettered by the constraints of parliamentarianism. And this duty of controlling the money supply is of supreme/prime importance. This is what the jews took from the regional godkings, this role. God, please, will that the Aryan godkings of the future efficiently and judiciously dispensate our Aryan unit of exchange, in perpetuity/forever and ever, (AMEN).

>>507372837 (OP)
Because I am not King :^)

>>507372837 (OP)

because only europeasants are so cucked they genuinely believe that they need someone lording over their lives.

>>507373351
Bewcock

>>507374187
Monarchy by competence? Kinda, ngl.

>>507372837 (OP)
Good monarchy >>>>>> "good" democracy > bad monarchy >>>>> bad democracy

>>507388840
>>507388669
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p0o6YQcEs5M

>>507388669
>>507388840
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p0o6YQcEs5M

>>507388426
here you go fren
https://archive.org/details/LOGH-LD-CA

>>507372837 (OP)
What glownigger psyop is this kings shit now? This is almost as gay as the alt right as an organic term. Or chud, or any other buzzwords you come up with. Do newfags actually buy into this or are you just pissing to the wind for five shekels a post?

>>507386582
Here here, i don't understand these people on here who want a king. Bunch of traitors.

>>507379914
>>507373351
Mecklinger and Bittenfeld. Mashengo was also kinda fun

Monarchy is the best form of government

>>507388426
https://9animetv.to/watch/legend-of-the-galactic-heroes-5?ep=330

Post loghs.

>>507390256
atleasst post the superior version

>>507390256

>>507384090
Cope, faggot
Your orange is just piss and shit

>>507373351
mittameya and reinhardo

>>507390787
You put it to a vote
But
And here's the rub
It can't be rigged

>>507373059
No, monarchy is a system where power is derived from closeness to the king, meaning the elite has all the power and the rest has none. It's not representative and it's not meritocratic.

Kings are bad because the average person is a retard, and retards should not be telling me what to do.

>>507372837 (OP)
Rule by bloodline alone is unreliable.
Only the fittest and who has huge investment in the future and prosperity of the nation should rule.
>>507373351
Oberstein - but man it is competitive.
Hilda is also great, literally saved Reinhard's life.

>>507390256

Democracies become nepotistic and can be easily manipulated at everyone's expense.
Monarchies can be mismanaged hard with no one held accountable.

National Socialism has a religious zeal to it which makes leadership obligated to the whims of the people and their interests. There is literally nothing to gain by fucking your own people over.

>>507389913
ty

>>507374187
But what if the trained monarch was a nihilist and didn't give a shit about the kingdom he was raised to lead and deliberately made it collapse as revenge for not getting to live a life of playing video games and eating nuggies?

>>507372837 (OP)
Because (they) aren't in the family line

>>507381440
Oberstein's only flaw was not being realistic and treating army units interchangeably near the end of the series. He was right though that the Reich's army is not for personal glory and there is a responsibility to not waste lives. Dude was also 100% willing to take the fall for all the bad shit.

>>507373351
>not one mention of Iron Shield Muller

Disappointing, all of you. But yes gotta be my boys the twin suns.

>>507391946
Müller kinda gets overshadowed by the other admirals in the fleet. I always assumed he'd be killed off at some point.

>>507385479
Few opinions are incorrect but this is certainly one of them

>>507390646
Love that one.

>>507391226
Poor Oberstein. He truly was a real one. Best autist ever put on screen.

>>507391226
>It appears he didnt trust others much
>But at the same time he didnt think very highly of himself either
Shit like this makes logh such a good show
Oberstein is potrayed as a slimey self serving douche and you think that hes just gonna undermine everything reinhard is building and he gonna betray at some point in the future but no he is so much more complicated than that
he might be the most loyal character in the show
He immedieatly throws himself infront of Reinhard when he was being assassinated and even gives his life in the end to make his last few moment on his deathbed more bearable

>>507373351
I'll watch the anime eventually, but how good are the books they're based on? I've been looking for a new series to read and it might be up my alley. Just wondering how they read since it's a translation

>>507392788
Rest in peace Oberstein my king.

>>507372837 (OP)
Eventually royal families fall due to dysgenics

Kings are usually the sons of warlords (good) but as time goes on the families become spoiled and selection pressure eases on them. So in other words, monarchy always starts good and ends in bloodshed

>>507372837 (OP)
they're not

>>507374187
so basically a cast system? How did that work for India?

>>507390256

>>507372837 (OP)
Kingship and monarchy are the natural, default state of human government. But any king should be from a long line of landed nobility. Trump is unfit -- riffraff. He exudes no dignity, just gawdiness.
Charles III should be king of America if America is to have a king. And after him the glorious King William, who exudes class and dignity from every pore.

>>507374187
Sounds like you're asking for a sperg.

>>507372837 (OP)
There's a 50% chance you get a bad government.
This is contrasted with democracy, where there's a 100% chance you'll get a bad government

>>507393175
William is the only candidate for king, Charles is a failed specimen.

If I was king I'd make all the girls wear skirts

>>507372837 (OP)
Kings is just warlord rule based on hereditary lineage. It kind of made sense in the dark ages of medieval times when the key aspect was security and stability and there was little middle class to speak of. But today kings make no sense. Like what are we creating a new line of nobility based on oligarches? Back then you even had marrying as a diplomatic factor. Imagine that in modern times lol. Obviously strongmen dictators is still tempting today and we have nostalgia for monarchies but it's extremely regressive.

>>507393339
The crown must be passed down. Yes indeed, Charles is the rightful king of all Anglo nations, America included. You might think he has personal failings, but who are we to judge a king? And William has the makings of greatness.

>Many Republicans are becoming monarchists because of contrarianism towards protestors.
Do they not realize that republicanism is inherently anti-monarchism?

>>507393147
Angel cop right?

>>507392788
I also love how, toward the end of season 1, the show hints to a rift appearing between Reinhard and Kircheis due to the Westerland incident, perhaps even leading to a rebellion by latter at some point.

>>507386727
I like it and watch it.

>>507393686
>Do they not realize that republicanism is inherently anti-monarchism?
True. Republics are unnatural and always ephemeral. They just don't stand the test of time like monarchies do.

>>507392788
>you think that hes just gonna undermine everything
I never doubted him

>>507393840
No, that's still LotGH

>Year 155 of the 1-month long rebellion-crushing operation

>>507393545
Kings and nobles were supposed to be a higher class of humans.
But in the modern era it doesn't make sense because all humans just get instantly mogged by machines.
So capital and industry have effectively erased human hierarchy.
And in fact it's even worse than that because low quality humans breed more and faster than high quality humans. So the human race will just get shittier and more dysgenic as the system actively selects for that. There's no way to go back either because if you don't play the technology game you get instantly destroyed by everyone else.

>>507394105
i became doubtfull of him when he tried to undermine Kircheis and created a rift between him and Reinhard but turns out he was just too autistic and really only wanted the best for Reinhards new reformed empire its just that he is so rigid in his belifs that he cant accept ever being in the wrong or something bad happening because of it

>>507391701
>But what if the trained monarch was a nihilist and didn't give a shit about the kingdom he was raised to lead
That shouldn't occur since rigorous psychological and religious screenings should be mandatory at every stage at the process. Additionally, anyone who didn't want to be there would not be allowed to continue. It would be similar to how governments screen those who will be in charge of nuclear weapons.

>>507372837 (OP)
Monarchies are near extinct in the west because they stood in the way of the banking cartels.

>>507392788
>He immediately throws himself in front of Reinhard
that was so great especially after watching the whole series where everyone still just treats him with total suspicion. God-tier character

>>507393141
it's not a cast system since there will only ever be a single ruler at any time, not an entire political class of them. Additionally, it's merely based on IQ, not on birthplace or wealth.

>>507395247
>That shouldn't occur since rigorous psychological and religious screenings should be mandatory at every stage at the process. Additionally, anyone who didn't want to be there would not be allowed to continue. It would be similar to how governments screen those who will be in charge of nuclear weapons.
You want Fascism, not Monarchy.
Even a good emperor/king can shortsightedly favor his own son, look at Marcus Aurelius undermining everything good he did by appointing Commodus as heir.

>>507372837 (OP)
You have a losing hand retard.

>>507395411
IQ tests are inherently subjective measurements very prone to bias. By using that test you are almost certainly picking some groups over others not entirely on the basis of intelligence. It's just a caste system with extra steps.

>>507395555
>look at Marcus Aurelius undermining everything good he did by appointing Commodus as heir.
Marcus Aurelius was the only one of the 5 good emperors to even have a son in the first place. He had no real choice as if he'd have given it to someone else that's just setting the realm up for a civil war later on

>>507395555
>You want Fascism, not Monarchy.
Yes I do, but we're talking about Monarchy and it is related.
>Even a good emperor/king can shortsightedly favor his own son
That's why I envision a constitution that protects this specific system of succession and prohibits even the ruler from changing it. Additionally, I would probably implement a system where the ruler can be replaced with a 2/3 majority of, say, a judicial, legislative, or executive equivalent, with the military acting as guarantors. A system like this must have protections in place in case the unthinkable happens and the ruler goes crazy or some other issue occurs.

>>507395731
That anon is right that's not a caste system though. Like modern day "meritocracy" the vast majority of people will stay in the "merit" band of their parents and family but it's possible to move and have the bands be altered even if such is unlikely. You can't get out of an actual caste system.

>>507389431
Based old men can't catch a break

>>507396052
Constitutional monarchy is a meme. Either the king has absolute power or monarchy doesn't work and is pointless.

>>507395731
>IQ tests are inherently subjective measurements very prone to bias
An IQ test would merely allow for admission to the facility. Passing the various courses, tests, screenings, and trials would ensure only truly intellectually, physically, and morally outstanding individuals are permitted to rule.

>>507396187
>Constitutional monarchy is a meme.
The ruler's power should be nearly absolute but his primary duty is to the state, not to himself. Hence why he should be able to counteract the system that put him in office, nor prevent himself from being replaced with another able individual if he violates said constitution.

The only system that works is mass murder and killing anyone that isn't yourself. Simple as.

>>507395846
>He had no real choice as if he'd have given it to someone else that's just setting the realm up for a civil war later on
Pertinax

>>507396518
You're just creating a framework for subversives to operate in. The law is for subjects, not the sovereign. A king beholden to law is not a king. The law emanates from the king, not the king from the law.
If you aren't willing to submit to the king then you shouldn't have a king at all and just accept whatever flaws result from having some other system.

>>507396832
Constitutions absolutely erode the role of the sovereign until they are just a figurehead.
Loyalty or rebellion is your only real checks to a monarch if you want the good ones to actually be effective and not fucked by redtape, shit monarchs are just going to ignore redtape anyway

>>507389995
Nearly every representative you ever voted for above city/county level betrayed you and their constituency on behalf of international interests.
That's why it's a consideration

>>507396832
>You're just creating a framework for subversives to operate in.
How so? Even if they unjustly replaced the ruler, they would have to operate in accordance with the law since they would lack hard power, all they could do would be to have another sent to replace him from the same institution. Additionally, I would ensure there is a secret police force charged with protecting this system of government. Well-designed, with no centralized seat of power, wielding judicial power but little to no hard power, and consisting of individuals raised from childhood to defend this system, it would prevent what you're describing from occuring.
>If you aren't willing to submit to the king then you shouldn't have a king at all and just accept whatever flaws result from having some other system.
If you submit completely to the king, the society will inevitably fail. There must be checks and balances at all levels.

>>507397294
>Constitutions absolutely erode the role of the sovereign until they are just a figurehead.
The constitution should be only for the system of succession and not be changeable, or only changeable with the unanimous support of all branches of government and the ruler himself.

>>507391592

>>507397865
>muh institutions
You're making a liberal's case for monarchy which is extremely retarded.
You don't seriously need me to explain to you how institutions are subverted and corrupted. Humble yourself and consider what I have said. If you cannot accept the principle that must accompany monarchy, then you are simply not a monarchist.

>>507398475
>You're making a liberal's case for monarchy which is extremely retarded.
The world is not static, new political systems must be devised to prevent the same excesses that have destroyed this one.
>You don't seriously need me to explain to you how institutions are subverted and corrupted.
I know how they are subverted and corrupted, they become clubs, their leaders considering themselves above the government. My ruler would have been trained to recognize this and would have the aforementioned secret police to deal with the issue before it grows to such a degree that the system itself is threatened.
>If you cannot accept the principle that must accompany monarchy, then you are simply not a monarchist.
No, I am a national socialist using monarchy to contextualize this completely novel system of government so as to make it easier to understand. Monarchies are a failed system, they failed because they did not learn from previous experiences, thoroughly screen their successors, or educate themselves as to the dangers that faced them. Unless you are willing to abandon the fundamental concept of monarchy, that the ruler's children must succeed him, it cannot be improved. A ruler must be an absolute force, an extension of the entire nation, its chief protector, and its chief executioner. They must never be allowed to turn into what they became (even the absolute monarchs), well-dressed showpieces sitting around delegating authority until they don't have any and their nations collapse around them.

Was Iserlohn fortress vs Geiersburg fortress the peak of the anime?

>>507399841
For me it was the documentaries on humanity's history up until the show's timeframe.

>>507399841
It was peak stupid
Iserlohn is technically more advanced than Geiersburg so there was no point in atacking it and losing the empires most fortifed space station
The battle gets even worse when they later get around the whole Iserlohn castle problem by just bypassing it and atack the empire via phezzan

>>507399320
Monarchy has a much longer track record than National Socialism. It's a flippant point to make and I usually wouldn't do so, but it's also a bit absurd for a National Socialists to call monarchy a failed system given their respective tenures.
I don't know if monarchy is viable in the modern era, I suspect it is not as I posted earlier, but if one is to be a monarchist, then one must accept the central proposition, which is absolutism. Hedging with constitutionalism is an ideological incoherency imo.
National Socialism and Monarchy are not adjacent systems, they are dramatically opposed to one another. You seem to be speaking of NS as some kind of improvement or evolution of monarchy but it isn't.
NS, according to Hitler at least, is a progressive ideology based in science. Monarchy is based on sacred and absolute authority. Depriving the king of the ability to bestow succession on his heir is depriving him of one of the most basic and fundamental features of mankind. It's totally unworkable.

>>507393686

>>507390256

>>507400745
Geiersburg wasn't the only asset used to attack Iserlohn. They also had 16000 ships and what really held them back was Kempff believing that Yang was still in the fortress.

I watched this expecting to be bored to tears just to get completly hooked and unironically sad when it was over. I guess that shows like this and Gurren Lagann are an once a lifetime thing.

>>507401137
>Monarchy has a much longer track record than National Socialism.
Yes, a very long history filled with injustices, impotent leaders, the tragic deaths of all competent successors until only incompetent one remains, monarchs being tricked into surrendering their power left and right, having their countries conquered because they were too obsessed with hedonism to do anything about it. Occasionally there are golden ages, just like with democracy. That simply is not good enough to me, I want a nation that can last thousands of years, and as far as I can tell, this is the best option. Unless you'd like to surrender all control to an undying AI empowered in a similar fashion, which would definitely last even if it may not be the nicest experience.
>but it's also a bit absurd for a National Socialists to call monarchy a failed system
Is it? National Socialism did not fail due to flaws in its own structure, it was overcome by vast enemy armies.
>Hedging with constitutionalism is an ideological incoherency imo.
You need the legal bedrock a constitution provides to maintain the direction and 'soul' that the original founders intended the nation to hold. If you do not have this, you will very likely end up with a nation that is the antithesis of itself. Now when I say constitution, I mean a comprehensive instruction manual stating that the ruler is lord and master of all under him, clearly outlines the full extent of the ruler's powers, explains the specific system by which the ruler will be chosen, provides specific instructions, details specific powers that each institution holds, details specific circumstances where the ruler may be removed (insanity, cripplingly ill health, etc) with specific procedures for verifying such a state, procedures for this, how they must be replaced, and perhaps a section detailing what portions of the constitution may be changed and how only if the constitution itself if presenting a mortal threat to the state.

>>507373351
Hard to say. As much of a hypocrite that he was, I still liked Yang the most, I guess. He was a wishy-washy /his/fag who was too much of a moralfag, but you can't dislike the man. (I'm still mad btw)

>>507372837 (OP)
They end up being controlled by Jews.

>>507401137
>You seem to be speaking of NS as some kind of improvement or evolution of monarchy but it isn't.
It isn't, the two must be combined to form a more perfect system. Each one changing to assimilate with the other.
>Depriving the king of the ability to bestow succession on his heir is depriving him of one of the most basic and fundamental features of mankind. It's totally unworkable.
You must be joking. In what world is bestowing absolute power on some untested, spoiled child a good idea? As an example, do they let the children of fighter pilots fly fighter jets just because they're related? No, they have to through the same rigorous selection process as everyone else. You could be the son of the greatest pilot ever but if you pass out at 8 Gs you are out. My ruler is not the state, my ruler serves the state. It does not matter what he wants, only carrying out the job he has been trained to do. If he holds a differing view of how succession should work, he would not have become the ruler.

>>507372837 (OP)
Hungary had an interesting system, of electing monarchs (for life).

>>507373351
>favorite logh character?
BASEDenfeld

>>507391173
Yes, that's what nepotism is.

>>507394522
That's what you get by attacking "nepotism". Back in the day people would help their relatives and do arranged marriages to unite families to help each other, so having multiple children was a good and useful thing.
But now people can't just favor their families and relatives and only superficial networking is needed to get things done. Result: people don't breed for the sake of muh lifestyle.

>>507384090
If Trump were a true king he would lead the charge against his enemies on horseback. He' a cowardly old fuck.

>>507373351
YANG LI THE GOAT UNDEFEATED NOT EVEN REINHARDT THE GREAT COULD DEFEAT HIM IN BATTLE

Its not that kings are bad, it is that they can become bad.

>>507372837 (OP)
Because of women. Monarchy has a shit fatal flaw and it's queens. Monarchy needs to have some mechanism where it only allows male bloodlines. Kings and Emperors can be great. But nepotism sucks and women ruin literally everything, every single time.

>>507373351
Reuenthal, Schenkopf, Bittenfeld, Reinhard, Mueller.

Based show.

>>507373351
Kesler.

What do you guys want me to do once I'm coronated?

Give me a Top 10...

>>507414412
#1: post your flag

>>507413050
queen elizabeth the first literally presided over what was considered Englands golden age

retard

>>507392788
Oberstein is the most devoted to the idea of the new Empire, to its enligthened autocracy, many of the others in the show are loyal to Reinhard personally but Oberstain is loyal to the idea which Reinhard is the person most suited to fulfilling.

>>507415486
England fucking sucks. Find a better example than some kiked up queen of the shittest nation in western europe.

>>507373351

>>507372837 (OP)
They're only good when we wuz them

>>507372837 (OP)
You guys need a literal imperator to rule with an iron fist. Anything else is just pure faggotry. Imagine the seethe.

>>507393175
Ideally I suppose, but there are few of them left and even fewer who are untainted, in truth the aristocracy reveals itself in times of war and strife and it is the blood of those who become warlords who can make a new aristocracy, Trump is still just of the mercantile class, he might be better than the other options put forth at this time but is no true leader, at the very least the rule of the mercantile class is lesser in its wickedness than that of the bureaucrat.

>>507395293
This is the actual reason behind the supposed "Glorious Revolution" of the English, both them and the dutch ruined the world.

>>507378486
Pretty much.

>>507415653
Isabella I of Castille would be my pick, Catherine the Great and Maria Theresa are also quite decent with the latter being quite great.

>>507416403
Humanity would have been far greater had each of those women been aborted.

Also if all the simps who like powerful women were aborted life would be amazingly good.

>>507403016
Gurren Lagann was so fucking dope, holy shit.

>>507380166
>The best dictatorship is better than the best Democracy but the worst Democracy will never be as bad as the worst Democracy
But that's wrong. The best democracy is worse than the worst dictator, because the worst dictator will eventually die and a good dictator will replace him at some point. With democracy, it's all downhill. It always slides into degeneration and stagnation, because the system never refreshes itself with the death of a leader. It's like a mold culture, in that one stain of corruption grows by selecting more and more corrupt replacements until the entire thing is spoiled. Democracy has absolutely NO means of self correction, so no matter how good things look starting off it always amounts to a slow and steady decline.

>>507415578