Anonymous
ID: C+kRMcQa
6/15/2025, 1:02:13 AM No.507401083
Why is Iran so bad at warfare?
Replies:
Thread 507401083 - /pol/ [Archived: 1137 hours ago]
Anonymous
ID: /p4QgSSF
6/15/2025, 1:03:28 AM No.507401265
browns are good at much of anything
Anonymous
ID: 45uaStmf
6/15/2025, 1:04:48 AM No.507401451
they are weak and poor. easily controlled masses. the leaders are keeping most of the money for themselves.
Anonymous
ID: HvI8Wf2V
6/15/2025, 1:05:28 AM No.507401545
>>507401083 (OP)
You have to do it a lot to get good at it.
You have to do it a lot to get good at it.
Anonymous
ID: LHv7yBqX
6/15/2025, 1:10:54 AM No.507402311
>>507401083 (OP)
Both sides are playing doggo, looking far weaker than they actually are to gain international support, Iran especially needs the big dog China to see them suffering, although Iran is much more powerful than Israel with a population of 90 million living in a mountainous oil rich nation with land connections to major trading partners, the Zionists have the USA. It's crucial for the Zionists to be under constant threat of annihilation by their neighbours to further their agenda, Israel will fall in peace.
Both sides are playing doggo, looking far weaker than they actually are to gain international support, Iran especially needs the big dog China to see them suffering, although Iran is much more powerful than Israel with a population of 90 million living in a mountainous oil rich nation with land connections to major trading partners, the Zionists have the USA. It's crucial for the Zionists to be under constant threat of annihilation by their neighbours to further their agenda, Israel will fall in peace.
Anonymous
ID: Holb9fpX
6/15/2025, 1:16:59 AM No.507403285
>>507401083 (OP)
the bracelet of perpetual vaginal itching will strike
the bracelet of perpetual vaginal itching will strike
Anonymous
ID: IA1gNIr9
6/15/2025, 1:17:40 AM No.507403372
>>507401083 (OP)
Military regimes inevitably destroy the effectiveness of their militaries.
The regime needs the military's loyalty to remain in power, because it doesn't have popular support.
This means it must curry military favour by offering privileges to its leaders. Then, it needs to turn the leaders who can be bought against the ones who can't, purging the leadership that aren't loyal to the regime. Those purged are then replaced with people either from within the political circle, or within the military's lower ranks, who demonstrate either loyalty or a willingness to be bought.
This cycle repeats constantly and slowly weeds out the competent leadership, replacing them with inept loyalists.
A poorly-led military isn't combat effective, but these regimes rarely have external enemies they actually need to fight, and so the army exists as a state police force to keep the regime in power right up until it's tested by a distant adversary like the US or Israel or NATO or something and demonstrates its inadequacy.
Military regimes inevitably destroy the effectiveness of their militaries.
The regime needs the military's loyalty to remain in power, because it doesn't have popular support.
This means it must curry military favour by offering privileges to its leaders. Then, it needs to turn the leaders who can be bought against the ones who can't, purging the leadership that aren't loyal to the regime. Those purged are then replaced with people either from within the political circle, or within the military's lower ranks, who demonstrate either loyalty or a willingness to be bought.
This cycle repeats constantly and slowly weeds out the competent leadership, replacing them with inept loyalists.
A poorly-led military isn't combat effective, but these regimes rarely have external enemies they actually need to fight, and so the army exists as a state police force to keep the regime in power right up until it's tested by a distant adversary like the US or Israel or NATO or something and demonstrates its inadequacy.