....Because you hate black people? Is that really it?

You erroneously believe that black people are "inferior" (meaningless concept in evolution btw) so humans couldn't have possibly emerged from the African continent?

Every ounce of relevant genetic and fossil data regarding human origins points to Homo sapiens having evolved from Homo heidelburgensis populations that were living in Africa around 300,000 years ago.

Then, over several migrations spanning many thousands of years, Homo sapiens populations began migrating out of Africa into Eurasia and beyond, with other populations staying in Africa, eventually becoming the Africans of today.

Most human genetic diversity is contained within Africa. This could ONLY be the case if humans evolved there, as it took hundreds of thousands of years for our species to form, and the populations that left to become Eurasians were genetically bottlenecked. Eurasians are all more closely related to each other than many individual groups of Africans are to each other.

Your (our) ancestors 300,000 years ago lived in Africa. How you feel about this doesn't really matter. It's still true anyway.

>>507467867 (OP)
> source: my ass

Cope and seethe OP, even if it's true (older remains have been found in Europe but you'll just flip the script and claim everyone's European and therefore somehow also has a right to live with whitey) the evolutionary process happened and we are not the same. Niggers should not be living in our countries. "Diversity" is bad. Kill yourself kike.

Here's how this thread's gonna play out:
>some retards repeat the same lie that Sub Saharan African all have ghost DNaa
>other retards point out fossils that don't prove what they think it proves
>a handful of creationists will pop up but they'll be a minority
>I'll get baited into a response and they'll inevitably give up when I prove them wrong.

Probably some shit I'm missing, but that's like 80% of it.

>>507468203
>older remains have been found in Europe
Ah, so a retard of the second kind.
Which remains do you happen to be talking about?

>>507467867 (OP)
Because it's literally retarded, the races today are an amalgation of various species that existed at the time all over the world. No race is "out of" anywhere

>>507467867 (OP)
all that just to say niggers are more primitive, less refined and failed to adapt and survive the new environment

>>507468439
why set your vpn to japan kinda cringe

>>507468373
The vast majority of anyone's DNA is Homo Sapiens. The most Neanderthal DNA ever found in a modern human was 4% of ~2%.
Homo Sapiens originated in Africa.

>>507468439
Modern niggers are about as closely related to the first Homo Sapiens as anyone else.
Out of Africa doesn't mean we come from niggers.

Unknown DNA that makes nogs a different species is all that matters. Too violent for the civilized world.

>>507468640
And here's a retard of the first kind.
Only West Africans have been found to have "ghost DNA."

>>507467867 (OP)
Yeah this pushback never made sense to me. It comes from a place of ignorance. Of course all modern humans have a common ancestor so what does it matter that the origin is Africa?

>>507467867 (OP)
> humans evolved
> then nogs evolved from homo erectus
> humans got nigger fatigue, crossed the Sahara desert into nigger free lands.
> The great whyte flyte
> 70000 years later jews starting shipping the niggers out of africa anyways, reminding us why humans moved out of africa

>>507467867 (OP)
>overwhelming genetic and fossil evidence of humans evolving in Africa
There isn't, that was true 20 years ago but the majority of evidence points to multiregional evolution.

This is the third time I've seen this thread. Guessing it's bait.

>>507467867 (OP)
Around 7000 years ago, God created white people in his image. Anything before that are the beasts of the field.

>>507467867 (OP)
All you're proving is I have a rightful claim to Africa.

>>507469147
>majority of evidence points to multiregional evolution.
No. Out Of Africa is still the most well supported by an overwhelming margin.
Multiregional hypothesis is taken seriously, but more in the form of "Out of Africa+" than how a lot of people hete like to interpret it.

>This is the third time I've seen this thread. Guessing it's bait.
It's one of the many recurring threads here. Bait or not, it's an interesting discussion.

>>507469224
Your "god" is a desert demon

>>507469147
>multiregional evolution.
what does this mean?

>>507467867 (OP)
>well yeah we keep finding settlements in Europe that don't fit our models but that's just irrelevant
>well yeah niggers are 20% non human but they're actually your pure blooded ancestor, goy
>well yeah people that migrated into frozen wastelands 10000 years ago don't evolve white skin but people living in the middle east did
Hmmm...

Only flat earther tier loons deny this.

>>507469539
Our ancestors maintained interbreeding clades.

IE Homo Sapiens didn't evolve then outcompete everyone in the traditional sense, the traits were passed along through different groups until we emerged distinct enough to be called homo sapiens.

>>507469539
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiregional_origin_of_modern_humans
It's an alternative hypothesis to Out of Africa, but it still contends humans originated in Africa, just in a different way, so it's kinda a moot point.

>>507469592
>>well yeah we keep finding settlements in Europe that don't fit our models but that's just irrelevant
Like what?
>>well yeah niggers are 20% non human but they're actually your pure blooded ancestor, goy
Only West Africans have ghost DNA.
>>well yeah people that migrated into frozen wastelands 10000 years ago don't evolve white skin but people living in the middle east did
Look up the "founder effect."

>>507467867 (OP)
>....Because you hate black people? Is that really it?

>>507469956
does that mean every region has its own homo

>>507470088
>but it still contends humans originated in Africa, just in a different way, so it's kinda a moot point.
yeah that's what i thought too, it's just pushing the nog origins back

>>507470088
>but it still contends humans originated in Africa, just in a different way, so it's kinda a moot point
https://www.earth.com/news/fossil-discovery-anadoluvius-turkae-suggests-humans-originated-in-europe-not-africa/

>>507470471
That was an ape that is believed to have migrated into Africa before diversifying into the Homo lineage.
Homos still come from Africa even if this find is believed.

The out of Africa theory has been debunked

>>507470662
In what way do you reckon?
Please read the thread to see if your argument has already been addressed.

>>507467867 (OP)
Animals left Africa and evolved into humans, animals remained in Africa and remained animals.

>>507470653
>Homos still come from Africa even if this find is believed.
It's accepted that Graecopithecus existed. There's also a site on Crete that is believed to have been inhabited by early man about a million years after Graecopithecus. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trachilos_footprints

As is we have a gap in the fossil record between these two to Homo Erectus (and other extinct groups over bout 4-5 million years). But that's always been the weakness in the fossilization debate, not everywhere is great for fossilization like Africa.

>>507467867 (OP)
This theory actually heavily implies that blacks are a less evolved life form compared to every other race

>>507471690
>It's accepted that Graecopithecus existed
Yes, but what's unclear is whether they were direct human ancestors or a different branch entirely.
And again, they are believed to have migrated into Africa before Homos branched off. So this doesn't prove what you seem to think it proves.

>There's also a site on Crete that is believed to have been inhabited by early man about a million years after Graecopithecus
They found what might be hominin footprints. I'm not going to dogmatically say it's nothing, but you're the one sitting here dogmatically stating these represent early human habitation, which there is very little evidence for.

>gap in the fossil record
As you say, this is a consistent weakness in relying on the fossil record, which is why the best evidence for Out of Africa is the gene pool of modern humans living today.

>>507471884
See >>507468636
>Modern niggers are about as closely related to the first Homo Sapiens as anyone else.
>Out of Africa doesn't mean we come from niggers.

>>507472284
>which there is very little evidence for.
Other than the two fossils found of Graecopithecus? Just over in Greece and Bulgaria.

>>507472621
>Other than the two fossils found of Graecopithecus?
Graecopithecus were not humans. They were apes more similar to orangutans.

Black people had a head start over everybody else so why are they so shitty? Literally thousands of years of being the only people on the planet and they never developed the wheel lol

>>507467867 (OP)
>>507467965
>>507468203
>>507468238
>>507468346
>>507468373
out of africa has been debunked and mainstream consensus more closely aligns to pic related.

>>507472786
>Graecopithecus were not humans.
>Family Hominidae.
They are accepted to be hominids.

Also we are apes.

>>507472786
>They were apes
No.

>dental root attributes of Graecopithecus suggest hominin affinities, such that its hominin status cannot be excluded. If this status is confirmed by additional fossil evidence, Graecopithecus would be the oldest known hominin and the oldest-known crown hominine, [ ... ]. More fossils are needed but at this point it seems likely that the Eastern Mediterranean needs to be considered as just as likely a place of hominine diversification and hominin origins as tropical Africa.

Kek.

>>507473236
>>507473416
Orangutans are hominids.
That term doesn't mean what you think it means.

>>507467867 (OP)
YES
FUCK NIGGERS

>>507467867 (OP)
>This could ONLY be the case if humans evolved there
no it means HUMANS evolved and left, leftovers are subject to darwins law

>>507467867 (OP)
> genetic and fossil evidence
Is this "evidence" here in the room with you right now?

>>507473526
You're the one who used it incorrectly.

And yes they are, there's 4 current Genera for Hominidae. Graecopithecus is it's own Genus.

>>507473933
>You're the one who used it incorrectly.
Where?

>And yes they are, there's 4 current Genera for Hominidae. Graecopithecus is it's own Genus.
Which supports my point.

I don't doubt humans came from Africa.
My doubts are that humans stayed there.

>>507474127
>Where?
>>507472786
>They were apes more similar to orangutans.
Literally every hominid is an Ape. That is a literal definition of an ape.

>>507474127
>Which supports my point.
I will need you to walk me through that? Is Australopithecus supporting your argument because how (other than being a fossil in Africa)?

>>507474274
>Literally every hominid is an Ape.
I'm aware of that. Nothing I said contradicts that.

>That is a literal definition of an ape.
No. It's part of the definition of a hominid if you want to hammer on pedantry. But there are non-hominid apes.

>>507467867 (OP)
the only things i deny is the talmud and your shitty thread

>>507467867 (OP)
Shut the fuck up jew. :) It's obvious most of life started in Europe & Asia.

It's only sad life didn't thrive in North America so we can have Egypt, Sparta, Greece, Roman empire civilizations without gypsy/persian/arab /jew/indian interference. Even the Africans kept to themselves away from Europe, but for some reason not those dirty good for nothing turks.

God I wish Europe was an island. America is amazing, no jungles, only forests. GOD I WANT TO GO BACK IN TIME AND REPOPULATE AMERICA WITH WHITE PEOPLE AND GO KILL THE MIDDLE EAST.

>>507474413
My point is the existence of non-human apes outside of Africa prior to humans evolving in Africa is not evidence of humans evolving outside of Africa.
Graecopithecus was a non-human ape. So when and wherever they existed does not constitute evidence against Out of Africa.

>>507468640
It's called irradiated mutated DNA. Once radiation gets to DNA it forever fucks it up. It's only sad that the irradiation wasn't powerful enough to give them life-threatening cancer and instead they remained black & brown skinned. Do you not think it's abnormal for africans' feet & hands' soles to be white while pajeets''aren't?

/pol/ is the only retarded place on the internet (and also Reddit) that doesn't call evolution a mutation and a series of accidents. Staying on 4chan AKA Reddit is willingly lowering your IQ.

>>507474451
>Nothing I said contradicts that.
>Graecopithecus were not humans. They were apes more similar to orangutans.
They are apes more similar to us than they were to modern Pongo. Closest other genus is Pan (because this is the ancestor we diverged from their ancestors with).

>>507467867 (OP)
>...Because you hate black people? Is that really it?

No. Its because out of africa-theory has been debunked long time ago by scientists.

Also it doesnt make today's niggers any better even if out of africa-theory would be right one.

>>507474714
>Graecopithecus was a non-human ape.
So is australopithecus.

>>507467867 (OP)
The humans most likely did evolve in afrika.

But the niggers is an unsuccessful offshoot that evolved in isolation separated by the sahara desert.

It's not like white people evolved from the niggers, it's more like the niggers branched off and evolved separately.

Any sixth grader with basic knowledge of genetics could draw a Mendel chart with traits from whites and blacks, figure out which traits are dominant and which are recessive, and come to the conclusion that it would be impossible for blacks to evolve into whites. If anything it had to have happened the other way around.

>>507467867 (OP)
>overwhelming evidence
Brought to you by the same systems that tell you:
>the Egyptians built the pyramids with copper tools
>no, you can't excavate and no there aren't any depictions
>here's an alium to explain things if you have doubts
>stop looking at the pharaoh's hair, no we can't display that
>giant reptiles walked the Earth
>actually they were birds btw
>yes we need to plant these trees on Gobekli Tepi

>>507474961
This is probably closer to the truth than what OP would like to admit. Niggers all have some other archaic hominid ancestor that nobody else shares. Probably homo erectus. Basically at some point a normal human fucked a weird monkey man and created niggers.

>>507467867 (OP)
>So, you deny overwhelming genetic and fossil evidence of humans evolving in Africa....
I don't deny it, facts refute it.

>>507467867 (OP)
I don't deny it
I am a proud AFRICAN MONKEY!!!!

lol didnt read, all niggers and kikeS need to gtfo

BYE

>>507474851
Double checked myself as I've been running on memory so far, sure. Though its exact placement on the tree is still actively disputed.
What point do you think this proves? It's still a non-human ape. Out of Africa only means humans originated in Africa. So even if this is a direct ancestor of humans, which is disputed, that does not dispute Out of Africa.

>>507474922
Again, what point do you think that proves?

>>507468238
>God isn't real but He did make everyone equally
You retards have been provably wrong for centuries. Fuck off back to plebbit.

>>507475522
I didn't say any such thing. Stop being retarded.

>>507467867 (OP)
who cares if we evolved from blacks. the old model is still around and causes many problems

>>507467867 (OP)
This theory proved europeans were the first to settle the Levantine and develop the earliest cities in its history

And I love it

>>507469224
Based

>>507474745
mark of cain

>>507467867 (OP)
>1pbtdid, probably been posted before
But I'll bite
They are inferior to live in civilization, no one cares about evolution, unless you want to go have a spear chucking competition with your pet niggers
Sage

Africa wasn’t Africa at the time.

>>507475514
>Again, what point do you think that proves?
That we had hominid groups that we can trace back as our ancestors residing out of Africa.

>>507467867 (OP)
Your data is old.
https://www.nature.com/articles/nature.2017.22114
Oldest homo sapien is morocco, 315000 years ago.
The science isn't actually settled on out of africa.
You should be arguing for homo erectus or habilis, but that too isn't as settled as people like to imagine

>>507467867 (OP)
Most black people hate the idea of evolution because they don't particularly like the idea they are lower on the rung of the evolutionary ladder. Only idiots and politicians pretend that the races are all equal

>>507476145
And Out of Africa does not dispute that.
I'll repeat what I had already said about Graecopithecus and Anadoluvius:
They are non-human apes that are thought to have possibly migrated into Africa before diversifying into humans.
It has potential to add a layer of complexity to the Out of Africa theory if true but in no way refutes it.

Not only out of africa is bullshit, so are indo-europeans.

>>507476436
>>507476306
Oh look.

>>507467867 (OP)
It is perfectly scientifically consistent to believe both that the earliest origins of the Homo Sapiens lineage originate on the continent of Africa and that niggers are retarded subhumans that should be classified as wildlife

>>507476641
>>507476306
Where do you think Morocco is?

Yes, I'm aware the standard Out of Africa theory places human origins in the South East. But this find is not the slam dunk you think it is.

>>507467867 (OP)
>1pbtid
eh, fuck it
yeah, I know it's bait. but the commie shitbag protests have been a nothingburger and pretty fuckin lame
>Faggot OP: WE"RE ALL THE SAME! YOU'RE JUST RAYCISS!!
Yeah no.

>>507476862
>Where do you think Morocco is?
North of the Sahara.

>>507477069
What continent?

>>507477131
This is the dumbest fucking argument I think I have seen in about two years.
Utqiagvik, Alaska north of the Arctic Circle and Tapachula in Chiapas are TECHNICALLY both in the same continent of North America
But only a disingenuous shitbag egalitarian would argue that they are comparable because they occupy the same landmass, despite one being very close to the North Pole and the other being very close to the Equator.

>>507467867 (OP)
>black people
>people
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
GOOD
ONE,
OP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

>>507467867 (OP)
Why do you call them people? They're subhuman just like kikes

>>507477501
We're discussing the Out of Africa theory and whether humans originated in Africa.
Yes, the continent matters.

It's worth noting that the Sahara has a habit of going green every 20,000 years or so. So the climate in Morocco wouldn't be all that different from southern Africa during these time periods.

>>507476698
Neanderthal supposedly deviated 800,000 years ago.
Europeans, supposedly, have substantial neanderthal components. Thus, we are far more deviated from them than the lying, despicable "scientists" like to convey.

>>507477963
>Europeans, supposedly, have substantial neanderthal components.
About 4% of 2% is the largest amount found.
It's hardly "substantial."

>>507476862
It shows the origins for homo sapiens can be off by almost 1000 miles and 150,000 years.
Showing vital information to be that falsifiable is very significant

>>507477744
Dude is making the Wewuzkangs argument.
>Nigs were in Africa
>Egypt is in Africa
>Therefore, nigs wuz kangs.
I know this is an oversimplification, but it's worth making the comparison because the egalitarians use this OoAT to justify their egalitarianism.
How this squares with commie shitbag-ism is because - using this theory - we are "all the same"
Meaning we all have the same intelligence, abilities, skills, talents, weaknesses, strengths, etc...
Therefore, if any discrepency exists, then it is because one group - usually Whites - is taking unfair advantage of another group - usually browns.
Meaning Whites are "Eternal Oppressors" and nigs and other browns are "Eternal Victims"
And only victims are virtuous.
This was all old hat by the time I was born - some serious digging up of old Stalin-era ideological warfare memes.
Gramsci, Fanon, Baran and Wallerstein. All the fuckhead jews at the Frankfurt School...
I got a list of them if you want to read them verbatim.

>>507477963
Nigs have up to 20% of their DNA from "a previously unknown extinct hominid".
They're not even humans. Not really. They don't qualify.

>>507478131
I don't recall anyone claiming this find in Morocco to be the oldest homo Sapiens settlement. In fact, it's disputed whether these were Sapiens at all or another archaic homo.

This notion you have that science is dogmatic and unyielding to new information is pure projection. The Southeastern African origin of humans around 200,000 years ago is still the general consensus, but there is always an implicit asterisk that anyone with two brain cells to rub together shouldn't need spelled out for them:
*This is the best interpretation of the evidence we currently have and is subject to change as more findings become available.

>>507477963
Niggers have up to 20% from some tropical erectus derivative, that's probably more relevant. Besides, if the fundamental question is "evolutionary distance", then you have to understand that the evolution of Eurasian agricultural peoples is massively accelerated due to human self-selection pressures, that is to say, 10,000 years of imposing the evolutionary pressure of densely populated ordered agricultural societies upon ourselves has resulted in a million years of divergent cognitive evolutionary changes relative to niggers, we are not like them.

>>507467867 (OP)
Sub Saharan Africans have Homo erectus dna.
Whites don't, out of Africa is a lie by jews

>>507467965
Go get your facts from the Jewish Bible written by schizos and psychos instead of looking at real evidence, you fucking monkey.

>>507478923
>Niggers have up to 20% from some tropical erectus derivative
"Ghost DNA" was only found in West African populations. Most niggers don't have it

>>507478768
The (((experts))) argue this shit and tell us that these are proof of the OoAT from hundreds of thousands of years ago.
But, where did early humans live? The same place modern humans live: Next to water.
Go back 300,000 years - where were our coastlines? How high was sea level?
The "earliest sites" are currently at the bottom of the fuckin oceans...
I'm just some random and even I know this shit.
If they omit it, it is out of incompetence or malice - and according to these "experts" it cannot be incompetence. Otherwise they would not be "experts".
That leaves malice.
Meaning they are lying. On purpose.

>>507473088
That’s how white people think. Good is evil, evil is good. Black is white, white is black. White people came from satan. That’s why their entire culture is based on degeneracy, circumcision, lgtbq, and killing. Saran doesn’t get a grip on low tech society

>>507479061
You sound like a self-styled "expert" on what nigs currently are or are not...
How does one get to be a niggerologist?

>>507467867 (OP)
All fake. China has better achaeological proof of ancient humans coming from Asia. Western Academics just have BnC cuck fetish for 400 years

>>507479233
How do those Iranian hypersonics taste, Shmule?

>>507478768
You're just blatantly lying now. The morocco remains aren't disputed at all anymore lol.
They completely upended the single origin theory for homo sapiens. It's now viewed as a diverse evolution taking place across africa 300,000 years ago. Go read anything about it.
What I'm claiming is that chances are good the evolution will be discovered to be even more wide ranging in the coming decades, possibly in other continents. Because again, that big of a departure shows how incorrect a previous theory can be

>>507467867 (OP)
No not at all. That’s exactly why Africans are inferior. They are the least evolved race. They didn’t do anything, they didn’t explore anywhere, they didn’t create any civilization, they didn’t invent anything, they just stayed in the same place that humans first evolved in, and continued living in mud hut villages hunting with stone age tools.

>>507467867 (OP)
OP apparently cannot understand the difference between a theory, and truth.

>You erroneously believe that black people are "inferior".
This is a learning moment for you OP.
You expressed a theory.
Meanwhile, empirical data and individual observation conflicts with your theory.
A theory does not equal fact.

>>507467867 (OP)
>overwhelming
Your life and evidence is underwhelming.

>>507479094
>Go back 300,000 years - where were our coastlines? How high was sea level?
Coastlines have waxed and waned a lot over that time period. I can't tell you where the coasts were with any certainty and neither can you.

>If they omit it, it is out of incompetence or malice - and according to these "experts" it cannot be incompetence. Otherwise they would not be "experts".
>That leaves malice.
>Meaning they are lying. On purpose.
They're not "omitting anything. You're just making blatant assumptions.

Rivers are good place to settle too and obviously those sites would be "at the bottom of an ocean."

>>507479320
I just actually read the articles you retards like to cite. I got my knowledge from talking to people like you.

>>507479449
>The morocco remains aren't disputed at all anymore lol.
What's disputed is whether they were Homo Sapiens. Work on your reading comprehension.

>>507473088
Instead, they invented the Bow & Arrow.

>>507479449
The "experts" tell you one thing while denying another.
Waiting for them to explain picrel
Population Y dispersal is a direct genetic link between Brazilians and Abos in the Australian outback.
Older than 12,000 years ago. And it is not a small signal - it was found in human remains 12000 years old. Meaning it pre-existed a great many things...
The idea that the Abos would walk across hundreds of miles of open desert - in Australia, which is just a giant Final Destination movie - get to the coast and then invent blue water boat technology and celestial navigation whole cloth...
Then sail across thousands of miles of uncharted sea, with only what they could carry with them
Skipping ALL the Pacific Islands in the process.
Then they land in South America, walk inland through inhospitable, uncharted jungles
Up one side of the Andes and then down the other side
Finally getting to the Amazon basin and going
>Yeah... this is good.
It strains credulity.
Explain this, please.

>>507473930
Yes. That evidence is with you right now. In your very own DNA.

>>507467867 (OP)
Even if that were true, which I don't believe. Who told you that today's Africans are descended from the Africans of that time? Maybe africa was white back then and all the whites left africa.

>>507480253
>I'm going to tell you what you know.
You're a fucking liar and you are pushing a political agenda
Which is anathema to actual scientific curiosity - using plausible deniability to try to hedge against being held to accounts
You need to have your fucking knees broken - stomped actually - on a flight of stairs
Shitbag criminals who were caught in Central America would have this done to them.
Crippled for life. "Go tell your friends - don't fuckin come in here."
And every day they gimped around, they are reminded how they fucked around and found out.
Adulterating truth because you want to push a political agenda? Yeah, that rates a stomping.

>>507480526
Now this is an interesting one I haven't come across before. Thanks.
Lazily googling the topic, I found this article which cites the two original papers:
https://www.sciencenordic.com/ancient-dna-denmark-gene-research/mysterious-link-between-people-from-south-america-and-australia/1420544
And it provides a potential explanation:
>Scientists believe that the reason for the genetic commonalities between the two communities is to be found in a now extinct population, so-called 'Population Y'. The Nature researchers believe that 'Population Y' lived somewhere in East Asia and contributed genes to both the earliest Americans and the peoples of Australia and Melanesia
Ofc, I'd need to do more research to say anything with any confidence, and I'd suggest you do the same with how smugly you tout this shit under the assumption scientists simply don't have an answer.

>>507480526
I know brazil's natives share a genetic link with southeast asians and they look very much alike, but this abo thing is new to me

That's a lot of words to try and say you're a person and not a nigger.

>>507468238
Seeth & Cope

>>507469224
>>507475877

>>507481185
>You're a fucking liar and you are pushing a political agenda
There you are making assumptions again. Do you have any data we can look at regarding the sea levels 300,000 years ago? As I said, they have fluctuated a lot and I can't be fucked to go digging for that particular time period.
And as I said, coastlines aren't the only source of water. Rivers exist.
What "political agenda" am I even promoting you disingenuous moron?

>>507481491
For the fourth time ITT: only west Africans have ghost DNA. Most niggers don't.
Actually read the article and not just the headline.

>>507467867 (OP)
This shitty thread only made you a niggerfaggot the last time you posted it OP and just makes you a bigger one every time you do.

sage

>>507477131
Your point is invalid, even the continent name itself came out of europe. nice cope though, also in relative terms not only it was geographic taken as european clay in ancient times but also there's some convergence between both tectonic plates, so you could argue that it's part of both because one plate is on top of the other.

>>507481614
Fuck you. Really.
Not angry - just tired of you narrative crafting faggots coming on here trying to push fairy tales in order to justify your political ideology.
The idea that "we're all exactly the same" is so ingrained in your demoralized faggots...
Because if we are NOT "all the same" and did NOT "all come from the same place" then your worldview falls apart.
Whites are NOT the Big Bad evil oppressors and niggers and other browns are NOT the Eternal Victims you say they are.
And this cognitive dissonance is so repellent to you, you are willing to invent a fantasy history for humanity whole cloth to keep from admitting what is self-evident.
Fuckheads like (You) pilloried Watson for speaking the truth.
You can eat shit.

>>507481401
The reverse is also just as true.
The idea that the natives in the Amazon basin just up and crossed the Andes - up one side, down the other - got to the coast and despite never seeing an ocean before, somehow invented blue water boat technology and celestial navigation out of thin air.
Then crossed the Pacific, reaching Australia, then crossing hundreds of miles of Final Destination Australian outback and then going
>Yeah.. .this is good. We live here now.

>>507481962
>"we're all exactly the same"
I never said that.

>Whites are NOT the Big Bad evil oppressors and niggers and other browns are NOT the Eternal Victims you say they are.
I never said that.

>Fuckheads like (You) pilloried Watson for speaking the truth.
Wasn't me or "people like me."

You are projecting your adherence to political dogma onto me because you seem to think Out of Africa would imply racism isn't true. You can accept the majority of evidence and agree with Out of Africa while also accepting genetic drift has made the various races different from each other.

>>507482117
There's simply too much we don't know about humanity's history, and we sure as hell aren't getting that info from academics who think like that cuck >>507481614

>>507482445
I already provided a feasible explanation. But you'd rather circlejerk than come to anything resembling the truth.

>>507481742
Keep on coping, mutt.

>>507482378
>Gaslighting
I am older than most poltards
Gen X
I have run into you fuckheads my entire life
You're playing the plausible deniability game
You ALWAYS start with this shit, and your wewuzkangs Metalocalypse Bleach is Healthy false equivalency comments bear that out
When challenged, you resort to overt manipulatiuon
>"You don't know that"
Yes, we fucking DO know where sea levels were 300,000 years ago
But, because it undermines your position, you hand-wave it away
You are a disingenuous piece of shit and you are pushing an agenda
You should be thrown off the roof of a building
Strictly speaking, in the interest of science
If I throw you and a cinderblock off a 10 story building and time it, will you both hit the ground at the same time?

>>507482668
Already addressed. It's a non-human ape that does not contradict Out of Africa.

>>507482445
I know.
The "experts" were sure where and when civilization started and by who.
Then Gobekli Tepe was discovered and upended the apple cart, pushing all that back by thousands of years.
Of course, the fucking Seljuks claimed it - nevermind they over-ran the area only 500 years ago and Gobekli Tepe is like 12000 years old... didn't stop them from claiming it.
So much we do not know.
...
When I was a kid, I suspected most adults were full of shit and didn't know what they were doing.
Now that I am an adult, I know without a doubt that most adults are full of shit and don't know what they are doing.

>>507481401
Is not because of that anon, is because SEA (aka indios) are half-asian and half-abo, or something like that. But it apparently was a very ancient mix,
Also, it's assume that all the 10k+ indios here are actually indios when they were most likely not since they came like 10k+ years ago into the america's.
And the indios themselves here in the america's even before europe discover it were already mix with niggers and whites in some places because probably random castaway boat or something like that.
The fact is the abrahamic cattle stop any and all attempt to understand the true history because they are ultra faggot sucking too much on that fairy tale sloppy.

>>507474961
Sahara Desert is recent.

>>507482739
>Metalocalypse Bleach is Healthy false equivalency comments bear that out
I made no such comments. You're just getting your emotions in a twist.

>>507482739
>Yes, we fucking DO know where sea levels were 300,000 years ago
I'm sure "we" do in the collective sense. But I'm quite certain YOU don't.
And, once again, people tend to settle more on rivers than coasts because they like having water they can actually drink. So your argument that the earliest settlements would be submerged does not stand to scrutiny.

All of your limp-dicked attempts at personal attacks just show you've been backed into a corner and are thrashing around like a terrified animal.

>>507467867 (OP)
This is a bad place to discuss this anon people on this board are way too emotionally invested in their racism to have an impartial perspective when it comes to the Out of Africa theory or on the origin of humankind.

>>507482891
Address where? By who? With which conclusion? Stfu you low IQ non-white, turbo mix speciesless faggot. Yes, you don't have a species if you're a mutt, or I guess you call it le race, kek.
The true is that I don't have any relation to a nigger, if you want to you can always move to Africa and become a native if that is your goal, go ahead, nobody here is stopping you, we encourage faggots like you to move into Africa, beautiful place.

>>507483353
>engages in DARVO
Denial, Accusations, Reverse Victim and Offender
It is a manipulation tactic used by wrongdoers to avoid being held accountable for their actions.
>I made no such comments
Oh?
This you?
>>>507477131
Sure sounds like it to me, along with all the other anons not buying your bullshit.
>fake accusation of emotional instability
Another manipulation tactic used to get the target defending against fake charges instead of arguing the point of contention.
Rules for Radicals - straight, no chaser.
You fuckheads have not had a new idea in over 100 years
And you have no new material
Frankly, I am bored with you all at this point - its all so predictable

>>507483621
>too emotional on my kike word
kek, you sounds like a stupid bitch faggot, so you're probably one.

>>507483725
>Address where? By who? With which conclusion?
Earlier ITT, by me, using the conclusions stated in the article you posted a screenshot of.

>Petralona skull
Disputed age. Nobody agrees on exact species. Pretty much everyone broadly agrees it's non-Sapien.

>>507483726
You're just sitting here crying and making assumptions about me based on nothing I actually said instead of addressing my arguments.

You lost. Crying isn't going to make it any better.

>>507481742
West Africans are the niggers tho. Nobody is talking about Somalis or Khoi

>>507484450
So, nothing. Go back to pleebit with your smooth brain retarded takes, fucking faggot.

>>507484772
If that's your argument, then so be it. Standard Out of Africa model places human origins in Southeastern Africa so the ghost DNA point is still irrelevant.

>>507467867 (OP)
Dude you realise the out of africa migrations was alresdy evolved into a different species than niggers when they left africa ?

We have the dna of the first humans thst left africa 70’000 years ago they werent niggers genetically


The separation happened in africa 200’000 years ago before humans left africa. Its enough evolutionary divergence as different animal species are too eachother.

And on top of thst it seems the niggers mixed with homo erectus inside africa while we mixed with neandertals making us even more evolutionary different similar in Genetix distance comparable to different animal species separated by 700,000 years of evolution


We share 50% of our dna with a banana. Dogs cats and humans all have the Same ancestor if you go far back in time


I dont think you realise enough about modern day genetics to make the kind of Claim youre hoping

Your knowledge is the level of a third grader thst have been brainwashed with simple obelibers like ”we all came from africa!” To make retqrds think there are no human races and like a bunch of niggers left africa like 40k years ago and once they came to europe they just evolved form black to white skin and just skin color is the difference and were all the same


No man there is 700’000 years of evolution difference. Smaller brain size. Different genetic behaviour etc etc behind infinity

>>507485213
Now stfu npc midwit retard this is pol people have brains here its not your propaganda reddit Echo Chambers where youre banned for posting the truth and genetic science because muh thsts racist!! The truth is racist! Ban the truth and only allow lies twisted into retard tier propaganda slogans thst you get called a racist for debunking with actual facts


I think thst Nobel Prize winning geneticist was taken all hus novel prizes when he Said the truth about geneuoc differences


Ur playing a fake game where you lie and Apply social pressure on anyone not falling in line with your propaganda lies


Its like a version of the emperors clothes

Youre not allowed to scared to say the emperor has no clothes

>>507484867
>So, nothing.
Wrong. It renders the Graecopithecus and Anadoluvious findings irrelevant to the discussion about whether Out of Africa is true based on the information provided in the source you cited yourself.

>>507467867 (OP)
If humans evolved in sub-Saharan Africa, why aren't there any humans there? Checkmate racist.

>>507467867 (OP)
>....Because you hate black people?
OOA is pro-White. If modern humans evolved in Africa then Africa is the shared homeland of all humans, and thus Whites (along with every other race) have just as much right to it as the Africans under nativist arguments. This is a guaranteed win for Whites.

Either White colonialism in Africa was justified under nativist reasoning, or we abandon nativist reasoning and thus White colonialism in the Americas was justified. Either way Whites win something here. People don't oppose OOA on racist grounds (even if they happen to be racists), they oppose it due to a general distrust of the soft-sciences. People on the "right" tend to fall into one of two camps:

1. Flat earth tier "science deniers".
2. Scientifically minded types who think everything outside of physics/chemistry/etc is not rigorous enough to qualify as science and who oppose the soft-sciences as a means to preserve the reputation of real science.

>>507485269
Lions and tigers are separated by 6milloon years of evolution and can have fertile offspring

Humans and chimpz are separated by same amount of time 6million years.


Many different animal species separated by millions of years of evolution can still have fertile offspring


Niggers are almost 1milion year different from white people genetically

Thsts the hard truth


If you have a kid with a black nigger the chances thst your offspring will struggle in society. Have a hard time geting jobs compared to white people become a criminal etc etc

Its not bexause hes a victim of racism its bexause you he Will inherit genetics thst make him impulsive, more vehaviourally primitive lower intelligent so that people that hire people for jobs Will not want to hire such a person with such genetixs

Not because hes treated unfairly because of unbased racism bexause hes just the same as a white person just different skin color


If you mix with a species 1million year different evol it o. It Will not become the same or similar to a white person

Any non retard understand thus except retarded leftoid npcs that cry their criminal boyfriend produced a child with criminal retard genetics that nobody wanna hire

And bexause they decided to produce a genetic mongrel failure they wanna use politics to force everyone into having to hire their retarded sjit offspring that acts line a primitive monkey

>>507473088
You don’t understand evolution. Black people and white people had a common ancestor in Africa. That ancestor doesn’t exist anymore. Modern whites did not evolve from modern blacks.

>>507486672
This people don't want to understand anon. They want confirmation bias so they can push their deranged racial supremacist fantasies.

>>507486672
Look may it was like that maybe they were lizards who grew wings

Their own branch of bonobo who developed by itself on another climate, went from white monkey to white ape to white hominid and was never a black bonobo, which and only which would explain melatonin dimorphism

>>507487006
I wouldn’t say it’s dimorphic since there are clearly more than 2 morphs. Genetic evidence shows that blacks and whites are similar enough to be the same species. That means they definitely have a very recent common ancestor. That ancestor was a hominid.

>>507486852
Nice twisted gaslighting

Homosexual faggot

>>507487461
We dont. We have same genetic distance as different animal species that have been separated by 700’000 years of evolition

Thst you see africa iq levels being 50-70 is becsuse there are insane time of evolutionary selection thst differs

>>507485733
>2. Scientifically minded types
Why the fuck would any scientist give a shit about your political narratives based on who are the true Jews.
1. Scientists know all the stories are myths and have no rigorous evidence to support them.
2. You’re all fucking delusional apes fighting for resources and making up bullshit stories to justify wasting your lives.

>>507487674
If you’re just going to reject all modern science and genetic evidence then I don’t know what to tell you.

>>507467867 (OP)
>"You guys"

OP is one of THOSE PEOPLE who thinks there are "2 sides" ... OP is a racist who works for Putin

Out of Africa isn’t even the official story anymore

>>507488015
I dont youre lying because you want people of lower intelligence to believe your lies in order to push your propaganda


Please show me your evidence that white people and niggers are not gentically different as animal species separated by 700’000 years of evolution


Ill wait you fucking homosexual faggot

>>507467867 (OP)
Aryans emerged from Hollow Earth (Garden of Eden) migrating out of the North Pole. Many civilizations originate from this ancient migration that spread across the world.

They want all of you to think youre all descended from Africans to cuckold everyone and laugh at everyone inside a secret room where everyone is like hahaha you all believe that, now im watching you poo

>>507488297
Yes it is. You probably just read some clickbait headlines and didn't read the article.

>>507467867 (OP)
are the older fossils 'more' evolved?

>>507488557
You dont even understand our of africa.

We have the dna of the first humans thst left africa

They were alresdy evolved into ”white” people basicly

There is same genetic difference beteeen niggers and europeans as beteeen for example red and gray wolve species thst have evolved separately for 700’000 years

Just imagine human civilisation started 5000 years ago. Stone age was 10’000 years ago with ice age and mammoths

And we have evolved differently with separated genes and evolutionary selektion for 700’000 years


That is why your niggers commit 80% of all violett xrimes despite being 13% of the population

>>507467867 (OP)
>Homo heidelburgensis
>heidelburgensis
Heildebergensis to be exact. And that one lived in today's Germany, not Africa. Heidelberg is in Germany. Even Americans know this.

>>507467867 (OP)
(((who))) collected this evidence?
(((who))) conducted the research on it?
(((who))) financed all of it?
do (((you))) need any more reason to doub it?

>>507488964
>You dont even understand our of africa
I probably understand it better than you.

>We have the dna of the first humans thst left africa
We don't necessarily know if they were the "first." But I'll take your word for it for now.

>They were alresdy evolved into ”white” people basicly
If true, that doesn't mean anything.

>There is same genetic difference beteeen niggers and europeans as beteeen for example red and gray wolve species thst have evolved separately for 700’000 years
Also not relevant. Different species have different average mutation rates and varying levels of genetic diversity.

>Just imagine human civilisation started 5000 years ago. Stone age was 10’000 years ago with ice age and mammoths
General concensus is civilizations started arising around 10,000-12,000 BC but not super relevant.

>And we have evolved differently with separated genes and evolutionary selektion for 700’000 years
I'll reiterate that different species have different mutation rates. 700,000 years worth of genetic various in one species does ot necessarily translate to 700,000 years of variation in another.

>That is why your niggers commit 80% of all violett xrimes despite being 13% of the population
I agree that crime rates are primarily genetic. But this isn't a dispute of Out of Africa.

Your entire argument is a series of non-sequiturs.

>>507480253
>What's disputed is whether they were Homo Sapiens
That isn't disputed at all.
You're just blatantly lying

>>507488419
Here is for example FST between europeans and africans.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fixation_index

>North American gray wolf–red wolf, FST = 0.177
>For example, based on whole-genome sequence data, the pairwise FST value between gray wolves and coyotes is 0.153

>the greatest genetic distance observed is between Mbuti Pygmies and Papua New Guineans, where the Fst distance is 0.4573, while the smallest genetic distance (0.0021) is between the Danish and the English.

The distance of new guineans and negro pygmés is equivalent too over 2million years of separated evolution


Same as red and gray wolves

When you see posters like this >>507488015
Remember that they get off on lying because theyre used to making up lies and then having people believe them

Its narcissistic gaslighting. Alot of people cant believe there are people this manipulative so they believe such people


Its a snake predator type of person that are incredibly weak when they meet people that call out their bluff to their face

>>507467867 (OP)
I deny evolution altogether, Jamal.

>>507489853
The mutation rate dont matter bexause i was talking about the genetic difference which is the same as species that have been separated for 700’000 years


Youre a homosexual that want to trigger me by lying like a homo


Where is your evidence you fukin homosexual

Ive posted genetic facts here >>507490082


Disgusting lying freak psychopath

>>507489853
Disgusting fucking retarded faggot

>>507489966
>That isn't disputed at all.
>You're just blatantly lying
False. A simple Google search (or even a plain reading of the articles you fags like to cite on the matter) will tell you about the various disputes around that site.

>>507467867 (OP)

There’s no evidence. Carbon dating isn’t even accurate at that length of time.

>>507490357
Okay, so why do you think any of this is relevant?
Humans came from Africa and diversified since then. Are we in agreement on that point?
If yes, then there's nothing to argue about.
If no, elaborate.

>>507490808
Nobody mentioned carbon dating. And other dating methods exist.

>>507489853
Do you actually believe people dont understand youre lying and writing nonsense but in a way that looks ”professional” just in order to gaslight?


I know youre a fukin freak psycho. I see right through people like you

Male feminists thst get arrested for molesting children etc and live on acting like holy people in public wirj a perfekt facade


You are a freak. Nobody Will believe you you have no facts no evidence unable to post anything that prove your claims


You suck i would destroy you and reveal your nature to anyone

Youre a weak fake actor you Will be so unconfortsble when i reveal your act that you Will run away

>>507491024
Are you having a schizophrenic fit or something?
Chill.

>>507490891
Youre trying to downplay the importance of 700’000 year different evolution because youve noted i got upset when people act fake and slimy with the truth

So youre doing it now on purpose in hoped ill get mad and keep saying how noteworthy 700’000 years of different evolution is to feed of my reaction


Bexause you too are a homosexual that play wirj the truth to be corrected and gain attention


You have a female brain that dont feel shame acting fake and lying openly


Thats why ur triggered by male right wingers like me bexause deep down ur a incredibly weak person that need to manipulate and gaslight peopöe
In order to not get completely demoliaued in social settings


Everytime you act fake its bexause youre too weak of a person to be genuine like me

>>507467867 (OP)
Solutrean Hypothesis is essentially theory at this point

>>507491178
Youre a homosexual that try to gaslight

If i wanted too i could force you to sit down on a chair and you woild be powerless

Ur a disgusting fake freak

>>507491178
Ur entire personality is basicly an act unlike me thst is just 100% genuine with myself this is who iam


I dont need to play games and hide my persona since im not a weak fag like you get it


Youre fake, you have no real personality or identity

Ur entire thing is a calculated persona and act

When people see this they laugh at people like you


Youre so weak and fake

>>507491490
Broski, I conceded every fact you provided on the matter so far.
I am not disputing the genetic distance you proposed between extant humans or how that would translate to the genetic distance between various wolf species.
I am not disputing that the various races are fundamentally different from one another.

I took the facts you proposed at face value and have failed to find any discrepancy between what you posted and the standard Out of Africa model.

I ask again: do you agree that humans originated in Africa and have diversified since? Yes or no?

>>507479012
Go get your dick sucked by your dog you stupid faggot.

>>507492019
Remember that people like you that play social games to points

Everyone knows deep down ur doing it and that im genuine

Its just some people with low self esteem question themselves and allow to be gaslit

Iam too strong for your fake bullshit

Ive met people that say ”youre a loser” and then 10seconds later infront of a crowd when confronted with perfekt grace saying ”what are you talking about are you crazy??? I would never say something like that” in order to manipulate the crowd


Youre fake man. A disgusting leftist homo


Ur game is weak. I destroy fake homos like you

>>507467867 (OP)
Blacks are mutants. The big lips. Exaggerated eyes and fatty body. Big mutated nose. Wire for hair.
Races evolved separately, nothing to do with africa

>>507492381
>deus vult
>calls anyone else stupid and/or a faggot

>>507492532
Yeah yeah, you've made how you feel about me very clear so far. That's all well and good.
Can we get back to the Out of Africa discussion or am I really that interesting to you?

>>507468238
>some faggot appears wanting to be treated as an authority
Get fucked you dumbshit

>>507492761
Your whole purpose is to basicly act in a way that people question me for my character and make yourself seem like the sane one in comparison.


Thats your entire game strategy.

Youre a fake homosexual. Nobody respekts you bexause youre not acting genuine who you truly are

Youre hiding behind an act a game like all feminine weak brained homos lmao

>>507468924
It's hard being a retard.

>>507492969
Thread's mostly played out as predicted.
Some people here are more persistent than usual which is a pleasant surprise.

>>507493004
I genuinely just want to talk about Out of Africa/human origins. If you want to ascribe some nefarious motivation on me that's another thing altogether. But trust and believe I'd much rather figure out what your actual point is than read more accusations of feminine behavior on my art.

>>507467867 (OP)
out of africa just proves that africans have inferior genetics because they weren't able to escape the easy environment and induce genetic selection

>>507469397
>No. Out Of Africa is still the most well supported by an overwhelming margin.
It's literally completely refuted by the oldest human fossils being found in europe.

>>507469437
Your mom is a disgusting whore.

>>507493508
No you do not want to genuinely anything. Youre not genuine youre a acting faggot

Youre weak. I dominate your game

>>507493356
This isn't your journal.

>>507467867 (OP)
Yes, i deny the idea that i evolved from niggers, because thats not how evolution works

>>507493590
>oldest human fossils being found in europe.
I'm gonna assume you're talking about these:
>>507470471
>>507482668
Already addressed. Non-human apes might have migrated into Africa from Europe and diversified to include the banch that became humans.

It was exactly what I predicted people would be posting in the post you replied to.

>>507467867 (OP)
The genetic evidence has discredited "out of Africa". Instead we see multiple parallel archaic and later hominids.

>>507470088
>It's an alternative hypothesis to Out of Africa, but it still contends humans originated in Africa
You can't fucking have both, the only reason you're trying to is because scientists are faggots incapable of taking a stand.

>>507493739
Cool. What does this have to do with Out of Africa or human origins?

>>507493739
People can Ask themselves in a dark room by themselves who they think is genuine and then trust their own instincts.

Then read what i posted and look at the Wikipedia articles about fixation index (genetic distance) between humans then look up this for different animal species and then realise triggered homos go any lengths to fuck with the truth because tjeyre pathetic wirj an ideologi or movement based on literal lies and propaganda because for some reason the truth is too racist so even Nobel Prize geneticisrs that go out of line are taken their Nobel prizes lmao


Imagine wanting to rule the world based on propaganda and lies its similar to when the Church jailed people
For claiming the earth was round

The information is just one click away on winipedia for anyone to read

>>507494039
>whawhawha
Shut the fuck up you dogshit lying worthless cunt.

>>507494165
The multiregional hypothesis is essentially that all archaic homos are really a single species, that came from Africa, and what we recognize as homo Sapiens is a result of convergent evolution.
It's a gross oversimplification but yeah, that's basically the hypothesis that currently stands as the strongest contender to replace "standard" Out of Africa.

>>507494475
Compelling argument.

>>507493807
Eat my shit you faggot

>>507494173
Dude. Fixation index between gray and red wolf that have 700’000 years separated evolution is 0,17

Swedes and niggers are around 0,18

>>507494624
And I will accept this as fact without contest for the time being.
What do you think this says about Out of Africa or human origins?

>>507494566
Go fuck yourself

>>507494624
Bantu and English 0,23 fst

Red wolf and gray wolf 0,15 (700’000 years separated evolution)

>>507494869
Its as relevant as saying that humans and bananas both come from africa bexause we share same origin with bananas you realise we have the same ancestors as plants right


The first humans thst left africa were not niggers genetically we have their dna sequenced

Chimpanzes and humans both come
From africa too

>>507495460
>The first humans thst left africa were not niggers
And the first humans in Africa almost certainly had very little in common with modern niggers. I've said multiple times ITT that "we came from Africa" =/= "we came from niggers."
So are we on the same page as far as that is concerned?

>>507467867 (OP)

Instead of spouting your bullshit you could be posting "inferior" (meaningless concept in evolution btw) " to supremacist jews on the world stage but we both no you wont because you fucking are one Rabbi.

>>507467867 (OP)
There's been growing evidence that humans originated from southern Europe

>>507468924
I agree. Genuinely don't get what this proves. Yes, niggers came into Europe and turned into White people, a more advanced race. So fucking what?

>>507467867 (OP)
>Your (our) ancestors 300,000 years ago lived in Africa. How you feel about this doesn't really matter. It's still true anyway.
Cant explain the ghost DNA Africans that european /asians/ and others dont have though, How convenient must have self deleted or some such other jewish trick.

>>507467867 (OP)
Its so funny you think this is an epic win because if human evolution is true than racial equality is literally impossible, and also black people are the least evolved if we all came from africa

>>507467867 (OP)
What does humans originating from Africa prove

>>507496079
>Cant explain the ghost DNA Africans that european /asians/ and others dont have though
Only found in West Africa. Admixture is believed to have happened some time after other populations left Africa.
This is explained in the same articles you probably just read the clickbait headlines from (let's be real, you either saw the headlines here or in a Robert Sepehr video).

>>507496391

Didnt read any of your shit, your paid to bullshit everyone so we allow ourselves to be taken over because you cant handle the fucking heat coming to you from allowing savages into our lands, we tend the gardens make civilisation work and you bent nosed fucks allow them to come here and murder and rape, you get the fucking rope too.

>>507467867 (OP)
Whales came from ancient land animals ergo horses and killer whales are the same. Nigger lover arguments are shit.

>>507496686
I denounce the Talmud.
The Holocaust didn't happen but it should have.
Out of Africa does not mean we come from niggers.
Happy?

>>507496079
Its because the latest split was around 200’000 years ago in south africa going by sex chromosomes.

But they only make up 1% of your dna. The people that remained mixed with homo erectus. And the ones WHO left mixed with neanderthals.

And the genetic difference is comparable to animal species that have evolved separately for 1million years because of this.


Its kindof like if i mix a horse with a donkey or a tiger and a lion.

And then i say lions and tigers have just been split by 1year! While their genetic difference is millions of years

Same goes for humans.


We split 200’000 years ago. But our genetic distance because of breeding with extinct humans makes us genetically different conparavle to having been separated by close to 1million years


Thst is enough in animal and plants to say they are not even different races but different SPECIES

But for some reason when it comes to humans this dont count and its just ”there are no human races were all the same”


Its such weak propaganda but you all know how it is. Say the truth and you get canceled and labeled as a racist.


Its just thst some people that arent educated and looked up the facts actually believe the science says theree are no human races.

And theyre naive enough to think Theres no way a lie like this could be claimed publicly id it werent true


Our current society and culture is basicly revolving around lies that hide facts in as primitive way as when people where jailed by the church for having the audacity to claim the earth was round

>>507496391

>believed to have happened.

like many hypothesis its all speculation, if speciation is a thing then its a thing in humans too, no?

Animals are getting smarter so intelligence isnt just bound to humanity, morals are abundant in nature but not in a seperate speciation that lives like savages and see's other outgroups as an enemy.

Your arguments are all bullshit.

>>507496391
You dont even have a genetic sample from this ghost species to compared and know this lmao


The genetic difference between all niggers in africa is high enough to not have split as recently as 200’000 years ago

So they all pretty much have it.

Then there is like somalis that are half nigger half arab hybrids that becuae of this could plot close enough to claim they wouldnt have ghost dna. But thst is a lie since you dont have a way to check its just since they mixed with arabs they plot closer


Its like a half white half nigger offspri ngn is claimed to have no nigger ghost dna because its closer genetically. It Will still have inheired 50% nigger dna with this ghost dna

We dont have a genome of this ghost species


Ur a paid faggot that lie like a homosexual and manipulate like this Anon claims >>507496686

>>507497012
Go wipe your ass with your retarded thoughts you faggot.

>>507497349
>like many hypothesis its all speculation
To a degree. But, if true, it would explain this DNA you said Out of Africa "can't explain."

>if speciation is a thing then its a thing in humans too, no?
Absolutely. However, modern humans have been blending and interbreeding enough that, despite our genetic distance, you can't meaningfully describe different races as different species by any coherent definition.

>Your arguments are all bullshit.
What do you even think my argument is?

>>507497012

if you allow a savage minded people into a well kept area to do as they will and make excuses for them like the jewdiciary does is this a morally reprehensible act or not? its not like the survival instincts been beaten out of us and pretty soon thats going to be obvious given the state of our countrys and the kike overeach in defending savage acts while similtaneously brow beating the natives for wanting to not live in a shithole surrounded by enemies they made for us by their fucking actions in the world, Its very fucking simple math and we know time is running out.

>>507497728
>You dont even have a genetic sample from this ghost species to compared and know this lmao
True as that may be, these conclusions come from the same data points they used to conclude there exists a "ghost population" at all. So casting doubt on which populations contain the ghost DNA is tantamount to casting doubt on whether the ghost DNA exists at all or is just an aberration of natural human biodiversity.

>>507498390
How many times do I have to say "Out of Africa does not mean we come from niggers" until you get it through your thick skull that OOA does not mean or imply acceptance of any social or political policy?

Niggers can go back to Africa for all I give a shit. Society would probably be better off without them.

>>507498424
>duu du duur I'm a faggot
Cock sucking shiteating fuckhead

>>507498090


>What do you even think my argument is?


That we should allow ourselves to be beaten down because really were all the same,right?

Well were not, there are outliers and moderates sure, but the actions of jews in their neck of the woods has marked us out for punishment only those who instigated those actions abroad deserve and thats right up into this present time.

People are going to start killing these hostile invaders so they get the message and thats what I'm hearing from everyone around me ATM even though I'm advocating for them to collectively make a mass court action with milions of names to challenge the narrative that whites deserve to be genocided,, its that fucking bad and I'm starting to jump ship on it too, these motherfuckers need a bloody nose

>>507468636
I’m not Black dude.

>>507499093
>really were all the same
Wrong. Nowhere did I even so much as imply that.
I accept that human populations diverged and are different from one another. I don't know why you think I believe literally the opposite of what I've been saying this entire thread.

>>507498424
You can conclude there is a ghost population because we are too different genetically compared to the sex chromosome split that is 200’000 years old.

While our autosomal dna (which is 99% of your dna, chromosomes just account for 1%) is comparable to much higher genetic difference.


In order to confirm there is ghost dna you woild need a sample to compare too. Which does not exist.


But since nuggers are on dna tests so different we can assume they must have not just split from us 200’000 years ago. But also mixed with some very genetically different extinct species too in order to have become so much more different genetically


Like i said earlier in animal kingdom species that have evolved as different as humans and chimpanzees can still have fertile offspring.


So in theory there couldve existed a certsin chinmpazee monkey that looked just like a chinpazee that woildve been able to become pregnant by a human.

Nothing prevents it it happens in animal kingdom.


So when you have a child with a nigger. Youre basicly mixing with a different animal species.

If people knew this and really understod shit 1million years and behaviour is genetic etc

I think they would consider it abit more before doing it what this actually means in reality


Its like experimenting.

>>507499486

Ok, So get to the point of it.

>>507499542
I would add this to the ”its like experimenting”

Its like gambling your entire genetic legacy

Youre mixing with something that have evolved 1million years genetically different from you.


And people like you make lies to naive white women that there are no human races so theyll feel oh ok tjen Theres no difference and no problem having a kid with a nigger


But shes gambling her genes and literally mixing with an animal… in a genetic sense.

An experimental different species with genes that have evolved 1million years differently from us


You have no idea what kind of genetic wierd stuff might happen when you fuse together two species with 1million years separated evolution.

Their genes didkt evolve together to compliment eachother.

You light keep some white genes that are very reliant on other wh it e genes to function properly that you lose whole replacing them wirj nigger dna and so on


Outbreeding depression is therefore extremely high risk


And when we look at animal kingdom cross species like this never really become succesful


Your veainwashing white women to genocide their own race and going extinct bexause you envy and hate us so much

>>507499542
>You can conclude there is a ghost population because we are too different genetically compared to the sex chromosome split that is 200’000 years old
Ehhh. Not quite. It's not just about how different the genes are from other populations, but also the consistency of that difference. If you see a consistent set of alleles all appearing in the same sequence, you can be pretty confident they came from the same place. The presence or absence of those particular alleles is what's used as an indicator of archaic admixture from a "ghost" population.

>>507499819
My point is we originated from Africa. Anything else you'd like to ascribe to me is a figment of your imagination.

>>507467867 (OP)
>Most human genetic diversity is contained within Africa. This could ONLY be the case if humans evolved there, as it took hundreds of thousands of years for our species to form
No, it's because Africans have no evolutionary pressure. They lived in small isolated groups separated by vast nothingness. So all kinds of basic monkeys could survive there until relatively recent. See Homo Naledi
As for the fossils , most of the digging has been done in Africa and that climate is also better at preserving them than other continents. In the future, more will be discovered in the rest of the world.

>>507500585

So you started out on the premise that we must be racist because we hate black people, Well they must be racist if they hate whites! right? So right from the very fucking start you made it about race and you even stated we must be racist a second time when you said we think they are inferior but you never said socially inferior or culturally inferior...

Listen you set the fucking stage here not me BTW.

I'm actully tired of all this shit and as a matter of fact everyones shit that doesnt mean I'm stupid and cant read between the lines

>>507501692
I'm not OP. I didn't say any of those things.

>>507500585
No you cant know if those alleles came from some homo sapiens group that went extinct either killed or evolutionary breeded into extinction or a ghost species. The only way to know if we have ghost dna in niggers is having a sample to compare them too. And since we are much more genetically different than the chromosomal timeline you can estimate the amount of ghost dna but heres the kicker.

Since we dont have a sample of this ghost dna. We cant safely say how much ghost dna niggers have.


I can make a rough estimation.

Since we are genetically different enough comparable to 700-1million years. Lets do 800.

Thats 4 times more different than 200k years.

If we assume then that homo sapiens is within a 4x lower FST. Around 0,05

Which is close to caucasian distance. White and north african is around 0,03. So even much more different but.


That would mean that in theory. Niggers could have only 25% homo sapiens dna and 75% homo erectus dna

Depending on how genetically divergent homo erectus was

>>507501876


My bad! sorry.

>>507467867 (OP)
>overwhelming genetic and fossil evidence
You don't have any. You just have infographs and website links. You've probably never held a human fossil in your life, you just take the internet and jew media's word for it.
That's called faith, not science.

>>507501936
Also thus woild explain well the kind of syntax error bexause.


If we all came from a rabbit in africa 200’000 years ago.

One rabbit jumps to europe
The other rabbit stays in africa but mixes with a crocodile that outnymber them 4 to 1 so they end up becoming 25% rabbit 75% crocodile


200”000 years later this crocodile species is extinct but the 75% crocodile 25% rabbit remains.

And since of the shared 25% rabbit with europeans 100% rabbit dna. And same sex chromosomes from 200k years ago.


Some jews then say. This 75% crocodile is where you europeans (100% rabbit)
come from!

Then the rabbits would say eh how the fuck can we come from a 75% crocodile species?

No way


Which is exavtly the kindof problem we see with these threads.
And then we have ofc you jews brainwashing white women thst a 75% crocodile is just the same as you 100% rabbit there are no human races go ur e just the same please mix with the crocodile whole rubbing their hands

>>507501936
>No you cant know if those alleles came from some homo sapiens group that went extinct either killed or evolutionary breeded into extinction or a ghost species
Precisely. And that's the core of the discussion around "ghost DNA." It's from some population that we don't know much about. It being from an archaic homo at all is a matter of educated speculation.
The ghost DNA we can confidently proclaim as being part of this as-of-yet unknown population is found almost exclusively among West Africans. Though there are studies suggesting admixture even among Eurasian population depending on how much speculation you want to apply.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7015685/

You're right that we don't know. But you're underestimating just how broad sweeping the results of that lack of knowledge can be.

>>507503690
Listen i dont give a shit if some woman is retarded enough to fuck a 70 iq monkey

Shes weak brainwashed npc whose genes are worthless

Im just mad that fags like you distort the truth


In the end our race Will remain conquer you all to your frustration

Because we are the best

>>507504121
I don't support race mixing. So I guess that makes me more right wing than you?

In any case, you evoke the lack of knowledge we have regarding this ghost population as an excuse to say all niggers have ghost DNA as opposed to the general consensus that it's only West Africa we can be confident about. I took that and showed how this very same lack of knowledge can be used to tackle one of the core premises of this argument that the ghost DNA is exclusive to niggers.
So basically, you want the ghost DNA to be defined broadly enough that it extends to all negroid populations, but just narrow enough to exclude all other populations. Your metric is arbitrary and self-serving.

>>507503690
>57 posts
You're a fart-huffing redditor. Doesn't even matter what you posted, you're an insufferable dork.

>>507505009
59 posts now.
It's a lazy Sunday afternoon and I like engaging in topics that interest me. Is what it is.

Humans were created by God then evolved differently by mixing with more primitive humanoids, hybrids of this sort and by mutation and selection rapidly in huge populations in different spaces. I don't believe mainstream science knows everything at all and science adapts to new info. It's very hard to estimate the amount of primitive admixture black Africans have for instance though on average it does seem relatively small in most of them at least. Still very relevant as only they and regions near them in Africa overall truly have some of this truly old school admixture. Asians overall clearly have more Neanderthal and then Denisovan admixture than Europeans on average and thus also tend to look more primitive. Mainstream science cannot even get the amount right there and has various estimates for this admixture in them. I find it hard to believe that the OG Aboriginals only have 6 procent on average Denisovan looking at their unique skull and much lower cranial size. Black Africans also have a clearly lower brain volume for their body size though not on the Aboriginal level. Oculocutaneous people easily show that race is clearly real and relevant mainly thanks to the varying degrees of primitive admixture human groups have overall. East Asians mainly mixed with Neanderthals who were a hybrid species of human and less primitive group than the others. They actually have the biggest brains overall. The best thing for Africa would be mass immigration of willing caucasions into their countries imo to lower their amount of primitive strains.

I am not reading the entire fucking thread

pic related is enough

>>507467867 (OP)
I read this and immediately my skin turned so black it's shiny and I started bix nooding. I guess I'm a nigger now thanks for clarifying OP.

Homo sapian species varients:
Europeans, indo-aryans, east asians, austronesians, people from the Levant, northern Africa, Middle East. Native Americans, siberians, jomon from japan

Unknown archaic human species that are not yet classified for political reasons:
Africans, abos, paupans, pigmeys, lower caste Indians (Indian abos)

Extinct archaic human-like species that we know of:
Desonivians, neanderthal

Human species that are more ape like that human like:
Homo erectus, a few other monkey peoples got that wiped out

>>507467867 (OP)

>multicellular life might have first evolved in what is now Honduras

>I guess we're all Honduran after all