So iran can tell israel to fuck off

>>507469216 (OP)
Dead jews are good for everyone a glassed israel is even better

>>507469216 (OP)
Especially since Iran supplies Russia with drone components to kill Ukraine?

Iran hasn't threatened to destroy the whole world if they're destroyed

>>507469216 (OP)
Iran has the right to have nuclear weapons, it's existence is being threatened by a nuclear armed terrorist state.

Westerners have gotten way too comfortable cheering for this side or that side in wars that don’t involve them because they have a false sense of security from imagining that they’re exempt from war somehow. Somehow I think when Redditors and 4channers see tanks roll through their streets they will shut the fuck up and stop playing tough guy Nazi/Hamas online.

June 13 Israel attacked first

Iran has the right to defend itself

>>507469755
The problem is that it likely won't be tanks on their streets, but terror attacks sponsored by Tehran, possibly one on a scale we've yet to see.
It's a state with a long history of sponsoring terrorism that's led by an apocalyptic theocracy that kills gay people and subjugates women.
I get that most ledditors' fedoras are collecting dust in their closets now, but who in their right mind wants this regime to have nukes?

>>507469289
>>507469352
>>507469604
I've been an "anti-Semite" for 20 years, thoroughly "JQ'd" thanks to Sailer, Unz, etc.
But I don't think Iran is led by the kind of rational actors that underlies MAD calculus.
Saying
>Israel has them, Iran should have them TOO
is retarded, not the least of which because it means the entire region going nuclear.

>>507469216 (OP)
There are 5 billion brown people on this planet. Most of them didn't have the internet before 2014. It was hard to monetize engagement farming before 2023
Chew on that for a while, fellow white supremacists of /pol/

>>507470507
You aint shit kike.
Neck yourself kthxbai.

>>507469755
>Hamas online
That's the other strange thing.
So many of these people, including influencers, live in likely "ground zeroes," but still cheer Iran on in its nuclear ambitions.
For example, Hasan Piker.
I get that he's a hypocritical, materialistic nepobaby who LARPs as a socialist and probably DGAF about anything except money and pussy (or dick?). But the guy lives in LA, for Christ's sake, probably one of the top 3 most appealing targets for terror in the US.

>>507469216 (OP)
An armed planet is a polite planet.

>>507469216 (OP)
Shills still trying to turn us against Iran? Lmao

>>507469904
Iran has the right to die in a ball of flames(which is what happens when you fuck around)

>>507469904
>Iran has the right to defend itself
>>507470752
I don't care how many missiles and rockets they fire at each other.
Though I do have sympathy for the Iranian people and wish the vision of an Iranian renaissance as proposed by Jason Jorjani could come to fruition, maybe even with a revival of Zoroastrianism (but that's a stretch).
But in its current form, who in their right mind trusts Iran with nukes?

>>507469284
fpbp. Fucking Pakistan has nukes. Just let Iran get the nuke so that Israel can be put in its place with their circumcised tail between their legs. Iran isn’t going to use it, they would be nuked in retaliation. But the world would be better off without Israel anyways

>>507470507
Post your dick. I’m not a fag but I want everybody to see that you’re circumcised. The region is already nuclear. Objectively the worst state in the region, Israel, is nuclear. They are also the only one crazy enough to use them. They tried to use them in 1973 and also after Iraq fired some scuds at them in the 90s. The balance of power is a necessity in the region. It is imperative that an enemy of Israel acquires nukes and anybody who disagrees probably wears a yarmulke or they’re just a deluded American piece of shit fundie who might as well put one on

>>507471504
>who in their right mind trusts Iran with nukes
I'd trust them over the predisposed schizo kikes in israel.
Did Iran tell everyone it would blow up the entire world if they were defeated?.

>>507470507
>But I don't think Iran is led by the kind of rational actors that underlies MAD calculus.
Iran's response to Israeli aggression has been shown to be measured and proportionate. Meanwhile Israel is committing a genocide on a client population. The jews have forfeit their right to be party to this discussion. I'd argue they've forfeit their right to exist.

>>507469216 (OP)
Nuclear proliferation = peace. Only the warmongers don't like it.

As soon as Iran gets their nukes that guarantees that there won't be a war with Iran

>>507471089
All these US flags, Eglin must be running around the clock.

>>507469216 (OP)
people tend to forget Muslim people use the internet too and spout their retarded ideas

>>507469755
>false sense of security

It would be cathartic to see that shatter.

>>507469755
>>507472379
>It would be cathartic to see that shatter.
That happened to a great extent on 9/11, which I guess a lot of 4channers & ledditors are too young to remember, especially the way people who lived in NYC at the time, like me, do.
In fact, my antisemitism stems largely from just having spent so much time in NYC and observing Jews and "noticing" (in the Sailerian sense) things, like their pathological paranoia towards, if not outright hatred of, white people, their nepotism, their greed, their neuroticism, their inciting of anti-white racism amongst blacks.
But... I still don't want a nuclear Iran, and I find the casual indifference of normies about it strange.

>>507473779
>That happened to a great extent on 9/11, which I guess a lot of 4channers & ledditors are too young to remember
Which is actually kinda sad.
Their childhood wasn't spent in an extremely prosperous, peaceful, 90% white America basking the afterglow of its Cold War triumph, with afternoons and evenings spent enjoying kinotoons like Batman the Animated Series or the Adventures of Spiderman, playing classic SNES/Genesis/PSX/N64 vidya, or watching the Monday Night Wars live as they unfolded.

>>507469216 (OP)
Mutually Assured Destruction policies result in peace.
Only one side having nukes, enables them to abuse anyone they want in relative safety as Israel has done for several generations.
Israel isn't worried about being destroyed, they're worried their hay days of sucker punching their neighbors without consequence are coming to an end.

>>507469216 (OP)
>>507469604
I will say Israel should have given up its nukes voluntarily, to put pressure on Iran.
They clearly don't need them anymore, there's never going to be a Six Day/YK war again (given their closer relations and conventional military supremacy), and it would completely invalidate the
>If Israel has them, why can't Iran
cope.