Why was Christian civilization less patriarchal than Roman civilization? Romans literally treated women like property but Christians at least pretended women had souls. Was it because Christianity made men soft and emotional while Romans were based chads who conquered everything? Or did Christian women just get better at manipulating through fake piety instead of direct submission? Discuss.

>>507476068 (OP)
Christianity was an avenue for the jews to subvert the empire from the inside.
All cooked up by Vespasian and Josephus.

>>507476068 (OP)
Pagan Rome never had a queen not even a single female senator

>>507476161
So Christianity is Jewish?

>>507476577
The core of Christianity is Jewish. It was pushed as a splinter cult to water down Judaism by Vespasian (and to also give him deity status to cement legitimacy for his dynasty).

>>507477134

>>507478019
That's all you have, kek. You're a fucking nigger who can't put together an article.
In fact, you're worse than a nigger, you worship a kike.

>>507476068 (OP)
augustus reform allowed women to divorce if their father approved. Christianity doesnt ever permit women to divorce but if a heretic divorces you (divorce is heresy) you call her a heretic and move on. punch a pastor for Jesus

>>507476068 (OP)
"Real men" go to war, fight, and die.
Feminine men avoid war.
In this scenarios who is more likely to reproduce?
Given that the children have properties of the parents (not just skin color but a wide variety of behavioral properties such as propensity to aggression which is demonstrated inheritable in dogs), what is the likely outcome?

>>507476577
It's pretend Jewish. They say they are blessed because they've eaten the fruit on the tree in order to gain eternal life.

>>507476068 (OP)
Women do have souls. Such a retarded thread.
>>507476161
Anti-Christian fantasies

>507476577
Nope it's literally drastically different and even then the "jewish tradition element" is from Antiquity Judeans not the Post-Second Temple Modern Talmudic Jews there's vast difference. But guys on this board are so ignorant about Jewish history let alone Christian history that they keep conflating the two because its very convenient to their worldview to just dismiss any nuance or actuality. This is the problem nobodies actually interested in knowing the truth they'd just rather believe convenient lies. Do most anons even know why the jews are iniquitous in the first place, especially if you think Christianity is somehow a psyop by them.
>>507477134
First sentence sort of contains some truth but again what do you mean by Jewish? Jews of Antiquity aren't anywhere near similar to Modern Jews which is what I figure your trying to imply
>>507478019
Again with the false equivalencies never change /pol never change
>>507478948
LOL. Wtf are you talking about? Find where in any Christian doctrine they mention "they are blessed because they've eaten the fruit on the tree in order to gain eternal life". Swear you guys aren't serious people.

>>507479367
But you share the Jewish god, book, myths and prophecies?