If I was dictator of America I would enact prison reform. I would make sentences less, no one gets mote than 10 years in prison. In Norway no one gets past 20 years in prison. lesser offenses get you a maximum of 3 years in prison. Murder gets you a maximum of 7 years in prison if you don't immediately get the death penalty(firing squad standing up.) If you keep reoffending you will be charged with defiance and be put to death. In prison there will be a reward system. If you obey the state and warden you will be rewarded. The highest reward in prison will lviing in a Norway like prison system where you can have TVs, video games, receive subsidized education, get quality food and drinks(no alcohol though,) you can meet with your girlfriend or wife for sex in a dedicated love room in the prison to relieve yourself of sexual stress(prevents male on male prison rape,) you get to leave the prison with an ankle bracelet but you to return by a certain hour unless something bad happened then you are exonerated from punishment. The highest form of punishment is severe, the COs and guards are allowed to beat and torture you until you obey. And you will be locked in a dark dungeon with no lights and you will be fed only mush and minerals enough to keep you alive. The prison system will be more strict and run by the guards rather than the inmates like prisons in Japan. Obedience to what is good and discipline will be taught in the prisons. Thoughts?
>>507519884 (OP)I would increase the number of crimes that get the death penalty.
Killing someone costs a lot less than warehousing them in a high-security facility, and has a much lower rate of recidivism.
OP have you been doing your programs?
>>507519884 (OP)Also if you obey and show good character again you can be released early.
>>507520050Life is more important than money. If you decrease inflation money becomes no object for the state. The defiant deserve to be killed if they keep reoffending.
>>507519884 (OP)There are different levels or degrees of reward and punishment. You can rank up or rank down based on your behavior.
>>507519884 (OP)Couldn't agree more. Having been in prison in the UK, I've seen that warehousing people for years on end seems to do little other than alienate them from society and make it far more likely that they will be recidivist upon release. Much better to enact swift, lethal punishment for those who commit crimes serious and outrageous enough to warrant it; perhaps mutilate those guilty of certain lesser offences, perhaps castration would act as a more serious deterrent for instance? Most cons I came into contact with didn't seem too concerned at losing 2-3 years of their life, but I never met one who would be pleased at losing muh dick and balls.
>>507519884 (OP)>no one gets mote than 10 years in prisonthis doesn't work in america. a mass shooter would do 8 mass shootings in his life
Prison for punishment is worthless.
Prison works better as a quarantine for people who can't or refuse to function in normal society.
>>507520686I wouldn't mutilate or castrate. That is very severe. Ancient Egypt used to chop the hands of thieves off though. I personally wouldn't do that. But I would bring flogging and corporal punishment back.
>>507520760It does. Because if someone needs to spend more than 10 years in prison then they are just defiant and should be executed.
>>507519884 (OP)yeah one thing we can all agree on is that the US prison system needs reform. 20 to 25 as a maximum sentence is good at the very least.
>>507520760You could always do like Norway and do 20 years or 15 years or something. Also courts can sentence you to a beating. Also if someone else beats you because you committed a crime they wont be charged. And defending one's honor is just as important as self-defense, it should be legal. If someone attacks/kills you defending their honor when you disgraced a court can rule in their favor and not charge them if the judge decides you were merely defending your honor. All of this words in a high trust society.
>>507521141corporeal punishment is good and should be normalized...something like whippings or floggings
>>507520248>Life is more important than money.Not really.
Pirate ships aren't gonna keep a worthless crewman around. Their ass is going to help and work or they're going overboard.
>>507520889I used to think this way until I saw up close some of the absolute animals they have locked up in there. There's are certain categories of con who ought never to be allowed back into society, and they also cause problems while on the inside as well. Just put a bullet in them immediately after their sentence has been read out, Soviet-style. Some lumps of flesh are just not worth the effort.
Prison reform is fake and gay. 80% of prisoners reoffend. Make first time offensive harder
>>507521367Execute sure, torture them, sure. But to mutilate them and castrate them, I'm not saying I would never do it. but I would REALLY have to hate someone to do that. I probably wouldn't do it. I would castrate non-White who rape or have sex with White women though. I know some "people" in prison are true scum, I personally would torture and beat them until they break.
>>507521457If they are so defiant execute them. The defiant should be either slaves or dead.
>>507521367Also, shoot foreigners out of hand for ANY crime. Muslims inside routinely end up 'radicalised' by some self-proclaimed imam who gets up at 3am to wash his sweaty feet and balls in the sink. These types are never going to be useful members of society when released, so they'd be better off transformed into pig feed.
>>507521981Just enslave/execute them for invading your country.
>>507521643I think I'm just becoming more extreme as I get older.
If you remove all non Europeans the problem takes care of itself
If you keep reoffending and your prison time sentenced to you goes beyond 10 years you are to be executed by firing squad. One method perhaps.
>>507522103This is the way. Too bad nobody has the guts to see that sort of policy through, even though it's exactly what a great deal of the population wants but can never say so in public.
>>507522430Age of consent was 10 before 1860 in Britain. It's 16 now. In the US would someone be a paedophile if they fucked a 17-year old? If so, that's crazy as shit.
>>507522512Damn, you anticipated my response and got there before me!
