Let's be honest, developmental dictatorships are superior to democracies.

only if it's a smart and good dictator. one smart guy running things for 20+ years is better than several dumbasses taking turns for 4-8 years during the same timespan.

>>507557483 (OP)
We are not a democracy. We are also a proud dictatorship.

>>507557483 (OP)
To be fair, China is a lot more democratic than provided inside of Western propaganda. The only fact is that they are owned by one party and that one party is elected by various worker cliches similar to soviets during the soviet union.

At least, this is what I remember.

>>507557483 (OP)
That's just because democracies don't exist.

>do nothing
>continue doing nothing
>wins the do nothing award

>>507557483 (OP)
Westerners killed off the political options they need the most, and made it impossible to retrieve and rebrand them if needed, because they made them into surrogates of Satan in a para-religious institutional mythology.

It's over. This is a civilizational evolutionary dead end.

National Socialism won

>>507557483 (OP)
liberalism is just a death sentence for any nation. it doesn't have to be a dictatorship but there has to be a strong framework in form of a constitution at least that protects unimpeachable core values and the foundation of the nation, otherwise it's just a numbers game between zoggification or islamization.

>>507558666
>unimpeachable core values and the foundation of the nation
That is what liberalism is.

Modern (((democracies))) have nothing to do with ancient ones. We live in oligarchies.

>>507558905
those can be non-liberal core values like the determination of a state religion as opposed to freedom of faith

>>507557483 (OP)
After seeing everything China has, I think I understand Jackson Hinkle now. He just wants socialism, but without the faggots.

>>507559143
Hinkle is a communist though. China is ran on National Socialism. They LARP as commies because of Mao and the creation of the state

>>507557534
>only if it's a smart and good dictator
either you have a benevolent dictator or you have criminal syndicates
there are no other systems that work

>>507557483 (OP)
I think the real lesson here is that everyone wants to live in a Potemkin village. Architecture is the most social of arts and public works, no matter how frivolous, always make the public happy even if it ends up being a cheap veneer.

>>507557623
>I suck cocks, China is a lot more democratic than provided inside of Western propaganda. The only fact is that they are owned by one party and that one party is elected by various worker cliches similar to soviets during the soviet union.
ftfy

Xi isn't a dictator
i know that's impossible for a lot of you comprehend but it's a fact
He does not have dictatorial powers in China
China is a one party state

>>507560128
>He does not have dictatorial powers in China
>China is a one party state
To mutts it's one and the same since they already think socialism and communism are synonymous.

Chinese system is very robust and seems sustainable in medium term, it should be studied.
I’m not even trolling or joking. They’re clearly doing it right, while their competitors are declining. It’s good to learn lessons.

>>507557483 (OP)
Yes, just compare India and Chyna