>>507565133 (OP)>but could a false flag even work these days? The media doesn’t have the ability to hide “malinformation” like it used to.>>507565219>Did you forget about covid? These goyim will line up for anything.>>507565386>Tough to pull off a false flag when the state apparatus is not under your control. When 9/11 happened, Mueller was FBI. Today its Kash Patel. Then there's Tulsi, etc other genuinely redpilled people very high up in IC who are cleaning out the deep state.Implying that the government has to be in on it for the even to be considered a "false flag" lol. Regarding 9/11, it's entirely possible that George W Bush had no idea it was a conspiracy, and that he genuinely believed the official story as well.
These people want change, they want Vance in the white house. My guess though is that any kind of false flag would not be a Trump assassination. Why? Because close to 50% of Americans would actually like that. When 9/11 happened, there were no Americans who liked it, and if there were, they were fringe radicals. There's a reason why 90% of Americans supported war after 9/11 happened. Today...you'd have to target something that hurt everyone:
>>507568451>Plan B:>>Iran, somehow for some reason has its own "Samson Option" but instead of nukes it targets the Internet.>>Internet infrastructure gets fucked for months because hardware keeps bricking itself due to a virus.If there's any kind of false flag, my bet is that it's this. It would be some kind of internet based attack, likely destroying the internet as we know it, and perhaps many computer systems that are connected to the internet.
While the internet has caused many of our modern ills (porn, social isolation, etc) it also provides the panacea that allows us to tolerate how bad things have become. Imagine what it would be like without the internet. You only have regular TV for entertainment. You only have newspapers and magazines for in depth information. etc