remember bros. if its boeing, I am not going

>>507576623 (OP)

My wife had flap failure once.

In 10 years from now I predict it will be very hard for Boeing to get any new contracts in places like India, Africa in general and other non vassals.
Not only does Airbus exist, but both Russia and China are fielding their own alternatives in the 737 class.

So we are talking about the MC 21 and Comac C919.
Not only are they more or less equal in terms of say fuel efficiency while also being cheaper, but both China and Russia have demonstrated that they will deliver on their maintenance contracts despite complications like sanctions.
And they are less prone to the Boeing issues.

The 2030s will be extremely hard for Boeing.
Given how Boeing has treated their sanctioned customers (like Russia, but they are not the first), if you are a country facing pressure from the US which potentially can become sanctions, would you invest in expensive high end equipment from the US?

Let's take a country like India or Turkey who both are facing threats, pressure and in some cases already sanctions by the US. Why would they buy Boeings for their national airliners from 2030 onwards? (replacing a fleet takes time and costs a lot, but now that Boeing haven't been able to make functioning planes for several years, this need of replacement is growing)

>>507576623 (OP)
Just fuck getting on anything with "Boeing" on it at this point.

>>507576623 (OP)
Sof laps fuckt, the first crash was to du that? Flaps magicly retracting and there fore all lift was lost?

its the toilets, they keep getting blocked and then the balance is trown out, never used to happen when poojas couldn't afford to fly

>>507578181
Don't forget that the Dreamliner is fly-by-wire. All it needs is the computer to say 'no'. The computer was programmed by Jeets. Imagine that.

>>507577844
>In 10 years from now I predict it will be very hard for Boeing to get any new contracts
Lol. No. Airbus is more expensive and they know idiot brown-skinned people are at fault for the crashes. If the third world buys Airbus, they will just crash Airbus planes.
>Not only does Airbus exist, but both Russia and China are fielding their own alternatives in the 737 class.
Russia needs western avionics. China needs western engines. This won't happen.
>Boeing haven't been able to make functioning planes for several years
Three incidents in the last 10 years due to pilot error hardly means Boeing cant make a functional airplane.

>>507578334
>Dave saarr.. I cannot do the needful, I am very apologize saaaar... Please to insert gift card to continue the operating.

>>507578815
>Russia needs western avionics. China needs western engines. This won't happen.
lol
Russia will import Chinese avionics and China will import Russian engines. Problem solved.
Stupid mutt thinks that people actually "need" his jeet infested products - you're in for a rude awakening bud

>>507578815
At least don't lie in every bullet point.

>they know idiot brown-skinned people are at fault for the crashes.
False, the 737 MAX for instance was not only designed incorrectly, and the pilot validation program (certified by Boeing) was not only rushed but also ignored many of the new problems that came with the Max in particualr.
This meant Boeing certified pilots without even telling them how things like the new autopilot emergency handling worked.
Just to name one example.
>Russia needs western avionics. China needs western engines. This won't happen.
False.
The MC21 is 100% Russian made and the C919 is already scheduled to be upgraded to C-929 with the Russian PD-35 engines.
>Three incidents in the last 10 years
I'm not even going to ask how you come up with that number.

>List of accidents and incidents involving the Boeing 737 MAX (only that particular model)
>See pic

>>507576623 (OP)
jeets destroyed Boeing.

>>507576623 (OP)

>>507576623 (OP)
If your Boeing has an ashtray, you'll be ok

>>507576623 (OP)
Boeing has been going downhill since they started outsourcing.

>>507580368
No, jews destroyed Boeing by hiring cheap jeets. When a jew throws a baby into the lion's pit, you don't blame the lions, do you.

>>507580590
Because it's in their nature? What's a jew's nature?

>>507580250
>False, the 737 MAX for instance was not only designed incorrectly
Yet only brown people crashed them
>This meant Boeing certified pilots without even telling them how things like the new autopilot emergency handling worked
Brown people couldnt be bothered to read a manual
>The MC21 is 100% Russian made
Russia, itself, doesn't even believe this.
>C919 is already scheduled to be
upgraded to C-929 with the Russian PD-35 engines.
Smart move by China, but good luck getting the airframe certified in most countries without Rolls, Pratt, or GE engines. Russia makes good engines, but politics has always hurt them on the global market.

All of these formerly great American tech companies like Microsoft and Boeing went to shit ever since they switched to AI (Actually Indian).

>>507577844
I'm not so sure about Russia, but China is guaranteed to become a big player on the airline market.

>The 2030s will be extremely hard for Boeing.
Good. I fucking hope so. I wish the same to Microsoft and Adobe and any other (((international corporation))) that destroyed its core products and competencies by hiring pajeets.

>>507577844
nobody is gonna trust a Russian-built plane, absolutely nobody

>>507579334
>Russian engines
Their Mig fighters used Rolls Royce engines.

>>507576623 (OP)
>brap failure

>>507580424
Its only part of the problem. Obama-era efficiency standards forced an overuse of composites. The turbulence issues result from the planes being too light and too flexible. The older airframes.hold up longer because of materials used. Older engines absolutely suck though.

>>507581634
yeah, they were manufacturing RR engines under license back in the 40s. i don't see how that matters today since they are now using domestic designs.
idk if you're an idiot or what but they never actually used engines that came from britain/germany in their fighters.