>>507601754>You won't refute any point from the 3h30 minutes documentary,ive done this lots of times. which ones wouuld you like to talk about?
>no issueseach mission has issues which could have ended the landing or resulted in loss of crew. go look them up if you like.
>obvious assassination of Thomas Baron who would have kept questioning the official narrative ifar from obvious and what do you think he was going to question? more issues with quality control? thats all he ever mentioned. did he ever say it was all fake? no. im sure you'll say it was in the 500page report, so again, another thing you have to invent to support your belief.
>somehow the US in barely 2 years made the impossible not just possible but piss easy, so really, what do you think needed fixing to make the stack work? the CM clearly had some quality issues, the wiring especially, but once the high pressure 02 system was changed there were no further disasters.
>destroyed all the designs used to create the lunar module,what are you talking about?
>telemetrydo you even know what that is? why would some tables of battery voltages, tank pressures, temperatures etc etc convince you of anything?
>the Van Allen Belt issue is still not resolved according to NASA itself,it is. but what you're confused by is that one single little interview with the guy designing the guidance computers for the Orion capsule. he was concerned about radiation causes bit flips and screwing up guidance. THATs what he was talking about....not the effect of radiation on people. And anyway, that interview was given before Orion did a couple test flights, one of which where they flew it inside the inner zone of the VAB for many hours to test its rad protection on the equipment. it passed.
now stop repeating this stupid meme point that you know nothing about.