Syrians won't exist in 1,000 years. Somalians won't exist in 1,000 years. Jews won't exist in 1,000 years. Humanity will inevitably mix and mingle over generations until it is one uniform genetic composition. Wanting to "preserve your race" is selfish, and does not put the best interest of humanity first. Racism is a relic of the past, and it has no place in our modern world, or our future.

Based, thank god /pol/ is finally realizing this

Plot twist: only white people are human.

>>507610187 (OP)
>Humanity will inevitably mix and mingle over generations until it is one uniform genetic composition.
That's not how entropy (mutation) or partner choice (selection) works.

Genes aren't paint. Entropy promotes diffusion. Diffusion in gene-space means people diverging and becoming more distinct. That has been the entire history of life on earth. It's a tree of life, not a funnel of life. We started as a common ancestor and have been diverging ever since. Your view, that we all return to the common ancestor, is equivalent to time running backwards. This confirms my suspicion that you don't understand entropy, since entropy dictates the arrow of time. As for selection, people choose partners who are similar to themselves. High IQ people are more likely to choose high IQ partners. Athletic people are more likely to choose athletic partners. Etc, etc. This creates selective pressures that cause people to become more distinct as traits become concentrated in sub sectors of the population.

This also makes me distrust you economically, since the same forces (entropic mutation and selective pressures) also apply there too. If you don't understand entropy (for example) in a biological context then you likely don't understand it in an economic context either.

>>507610187 (OP)
It took over a thousand years for the Iranians in India to completely mix with Dravidians. The current order of globalization won’t remain stable long enough for that to happen. There will be economic collapse, secession, war, and balkanization.

>>507610187 (OP)
>preserving your race is bad
>unless you're native american or any other race

You won't exist in 100 let alone 1000 years so why shouldn't it be legal for me to kill you?

>>507611188
As someone who’s currently taking a college-level biochem course which overviews entropy, this is just about the most bastardized construment of the concept I’ve ever seen, and makes no more sense than it would to exclusively consume carrots as a means of somehow “preserving entropy” within yourself. It’s physically impossible to do something that doesn’t increase entropy that’s like, the entire point of the concept. It doesn’t matter if you have sex with every single person on the planet or spend all of your time living in the basement of your mom’s room because no matter what you do, that thing will result in an increase in entropy, and life in itself is particularly good at causing entropy. Trying to apply a “moral” or philisophical outlook to the concept is pointless, since the very calculations which give rise to the concept of entropy are so deterministic that they are incompatible with the idea you could “choose” to be less entropic in the first place.

>>507610187 (OP)
>won't exist in a thousand years
my home town is older than that

>>507610187 (OP)
ALL JEW 2050

>>507612283
Or since supposedly races won't exist in 1000 years according to you then why shouldn't we genocide the problematic races such as dumb niggers or scheming jews?

>>507611231
But even there the Indians didn't mix. The original PIE groups still exist. The original Dravidian groups still exist. The mutts just added a bunch of new races on top of the previously existing ones, making it even less racially uniform. This has been happening since the beginning of life on earth.

It's basically the
>if dogs evolved from wolves then how come there are still wolves?
meme. In the absence of extreme selective pressure, evolution is always divergent. The only way you will have everyone converge into one race is with extreme selective pressures (ie genocide). When mutation is the only thing driving evolution it's always going to be divergence because entropy promotes diffusion in gene-space, and diffusion in gene-space means divergence. To have convergence you need some kind of selective pressure to kill off all the mutants that don't conform to whatever form you are trying to converge on.

>>507612672
Life itself is a product of entropy you bellend. The fact that a process is entropic does not in any way mean that it is evolutionarily bad or harmful, and the fact life exists in the first place is evidence of that. If anything, natural selection is an exploitation of entropic processes by means of which localized order is created within the organisms resulting from it while entropy is created elsewhere.

>>507612515
Mine too, actually.
Although arabic semites occupy the Middle East, Mesopotamian townships still exist and a non-negligible portion of Mesopotamians share genetic continuity with people from 4000 years ago.

But the funniest funny is that this BS is repeated by people who don't believe in their own reproduction to begin with, and espouse antinatalism and/or cucking. Literally it's Chad Aryan face looking at screeching lefty autists who are actively disappearing into a puff of (rancid) smoke

>>507610187 (OP)
>amerishart cant comprehend that many peoples and nations are well over 1,000 years old because his country is collapsing in less than 250

>>507610187 (OP)
Wrong.
1000, 2000, 5000 years ago Europeans were still European. Germany as a state didn't exist but the peoples that became Germans did and still do exist as distinct groups.
We can literally trace our genetic history back thousands of years. Only the names change.
There will be no coffee brown colored mulatto race.

>>507612341
>100 level course
Thank you dear scholar!

>>507610187 (OP)
What do you want humanity to look like in the far future op? Should we become better or worse?

>>507611173
/thread
stop bumping this 1pbtID glowtard spam

>>507610187 (OP)
youre right, its not racism its complete and utter disdain for the way the influx of immigrants conduct themselves. im sure creating more ghettos around the country will fix this and bring us closer to the lightly coloured turd filled eutopia the friends of the world wish for from their ivory towers

>>507610187 (OP)
That's forgetting people have inbuilt preferences for partners. My native gf only dated whites and natives out of sexual preference - she's the least racist person on the planet, she's just wired to like a certain type. If there's a genetic component to that then that will get passed down. People won't become an all homogeneous race as long as people still have sexual preferences for say green eyed redheads or pale goth women or tall dark and handsome men, etc.

>>507610187 (OP)
racism is why Neanderthals died off and why Homo sapiens thrived. if Homo sapiens just accepted groups like Neanderthals into the tribe, we humans wouldn't have evolved to what we are today.

so in the long run, racism is good.

>>507615311
Except they did… which is why many modern day peoples (Europeans especially) have significant portions of their genome made up from DNA of Neandrathal ancestry

>>507612341
That's my point. Large/complex systems evolve in a way that tends to increase total entropy, but this promotes divergence. Higher entropy states have higher multiplicity, and thus any kind of equality requires maintaining a low entropy state because the ratio between the number of configurations where everyone is equal and the number of configurations where they aren't always approaches zero as systems get large enough. Convergent evolution requires extreme selective pressures to counteract entropic divergence.

For example imagine flipping 1000 coins. There are only 2 possible configurations where everything is equal. All heads or all tails. There are 2^1000 possible configurations in total. That means the number of unequal configurations is 2^1000 - 2. That's more than the number of atoms in the universe. If you flip 1000 coins your chance of getting equality is 0.000000... to almost a thousand decimal places. You aren't going to get all heads or all tails from random chance, you need to rig the game. There is a notion in which entropy is associated with equality though. In the 1000 coin example, the most likely outcome (by a huge margin) is a configuration with 500 heads and 500 tails. This is equality in a sense, but it's not the same as equality in the sense of
>everyone is the same race
>everyone has the same wealth
etc. This kind of equality is saying that everyone is equally likely to belong to any race or to belong to any wealth class, not that there is only one race or only one wealth class.

Low entropy limit:
Everyone is the same race.
Everyone is in the same wealth class.
Etc.

High entropy limit:
A continuum of races exist, and you are equally likely to belong to any of them.
A continuum of wealth classes exist, and you are equally likely to belong to any of them.
Etc.

>>507610187 (OP)
The royal lines remain pure.

>>507610187 (OP)
This is a copypasta you all can find on 4plebs.

>>507610187 (OP)
gotta be more convincing than that kalergi

>>507616361
It's also widely believed in the real world, even by people who should be smart enough to know better, so it's important to discuss even if OP is fag etc.

>>507610187 (OP)
More importantly, I won't exist in 1000 years.