would you consider the “no kings” protests a success?

>>507615187 (OP)
should be a protest against niggers aka no kangz rally

Yeah, it gave people something to do outside on the weekend rather than huddle inside and eat, masturbate, and/or watch/play assorted forms of entertainment. America will be healthy again. More outside protests.

>>507615187 (OP)
The goal was to stop mass deportations. Mass deportations have stopped. It worked. The right got themselves a meme sentence to own the libs. So everyone got what they wanted.

>>507615187 (OP)
It does, he's in greece rn if I remember correctly

Every pic is full of the same looking boomers.

>>507615440
>Yeah, it gave people something to do
ok but all they did was shout at dolls of Trump

Yes, just like all the other major leftist actions:
Hands Off
LA Riots
Anti-Musk campaign
These pop-up movements will continue to keep the momentum going. All the big money has been mobilized, get ready.

Someone post Trump's response to the No Kings pride parades

>wtf, I thought this was the "no nigs" protest!!!!

>>507615187 (OP)
>>507615412
>>507615440
>>507615499
>>507615501
Poor guy has terminal cancer. RIP in peace

>>507615187 (OP)
>lets protest REPUBLICANS with a protest called "No Kings"
Most retarded protest I've ever heard of.

>>507615187 (OP)
It was doomed from the start. It would only work if it caught people's attention and made the news, but it would only catch people's attention and make the news if it led to chimpouts. But if it led to chimpouts, it would lose popular support, making it unsuccessful. So they were doomed to failure: they were failures if nobody paid attention to them, and they would fail if people paid attention to them for causing chimpouts.

The kingdoms arise as the countries dissolve. An arrival of a new king will mess the plans.

>>507615187 (OP)
>t-t-t-take that liberolls
>dies of cancer
KWAB

>>507616008
rip dilbertman

>>507616015
Democrats will come up with dumber stuff.

>>507616387
Who's dilbert?

>>507616901
Something from the before times. Best not to find out.

>>507615807
Those boomers had more physical activity in one day than they've had in their entire lives. Exercise is exercise. This rally was an RFK psyop. Americans will protest more, and become healthy in turn. Matters not the semantics of it.
>>507616008
>bald/balding
Sign of a vaxxie.

The Clintons and Kamala Harris Descend on a Hamptons Wedding of Liberal “Liberal royalty?” Say, what? There is such a thing? In the party of No Kings?

>>507615187 (OP)
>largest protest in US history
>the only violence was instigated by conservatives trying to crash the protests
>they were all immediately shut down
>all republicucks can do is pretend it wasnt huge
>all of the "we the people" rhetoric died overnight because you losers cant even convince yourselves that you're the majority anymore
At this point I'm pretty sure rightoids have some kind of collective humiliation fetish.
Cant wait til 2026. I've never been one to call for blue/red waves in advance but its completely inevitable that republicans are going to get absolutely fucking decimated.

>>507615187 (OP)
>hecking silent majority didn't show up to the military birthday parade designed to host 200'000 people
>handful of onions cuck leftists created one of the biggest nationwide protests in modern US history

I dunno u guise, I think this was yet another hecking failerino by Soros.

>>507615187 (OP)
The core message doesn't make sense because he won the popular vote. They should find something else to work with.

>>507618174
Some claim the election was rigged

>>507615187 (OP)
If you have to keep shouting it was a success days after then maybe it makes me think it wasn't a success.
Leftoids always pull Streisand effect.

It's so sad that he really has no one to care about him as he dies. Like bro put down the politics slop and try to give your family some closure.

>>507618679
It always is.

>>507618679

AIPAC means Israel is rigging all the elections.

I hate all these dumbass protestors and everything they stand for and I think it's very stupid to be obstructive and to break the law. However, has there ever once been a "peaceful law abiding protest" that has ever once incited change in the US?
Occupy Wallstreet did nothing and Wallstreet is more corrupt than ever. Civil rights was peaceful with MLK Jr, but it was also accompanied by Black Panther and Malcolm X violent rioting. Union protests were legally changed so that Union workers could be forced to go back to work or face criminal charges.
However on the other hand
>BLM
>Rodney King
>George Floyd
All 3 of these "protests" were violent and criminal, yet they got the biggest reaction from the government and things actually changed in favor of the criminals.
Now the current protests, you have states where people are peacefully protesting and nothing changes, but you have Commiefornia bending over backwards to appease their violent rioters. So clearly the violent ones actually work. They get more eyes on them, get more people talking about them, and the government is forced to respond before too much money and life is lost.

I don't think peaceful protesting works in the US guys and that's sad.

Now like I said before, I don't care for any of the protests going on right now. I want these illegal fucks out of my country, but when something happens that does affect me and I want to protest against it and I want things to change what can I even do about it?

The story made the front page of most international newspapers and many American ones I came across, alongside reports that Trump’s birthday march was somewhat underwhelming.

In general any coverage of Trump’s march also mentioned the protests, and vice versa. The overall takeaway seemed to be that the protests drew larger crowds than the march itself which was seen as a bit of a disappointment.

That said, the coverage of both events was largely overshadowed by the Minnesota shootings and the ongoing Iran-Israel conflict.