Are open source / free games pozz-proof? - /pol/ (#507659102) [Archived: 1122 hours ago]

Anonymous ID: 3+pKxkXnUnited States
6/17/2025, 2:05:42 AM No.507659102
Brogue
Brogue
md5: cda70e182e953dc554f74fdc57b06d30🔍
Seems globohomo hasn't yet put their claws into them.
Replies: >>507660203 >>507660337
Anonymous ID: fDja/f5I
6/17/2025, 2:12:35 AM No.507660203
>>507659102 (OP)
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html

The fact that you're calling it "open source" is already evidence that globohomo obstructed the bigger picture.
Anonymous ID: QbypQYA1
6/17/2025, 2:13:28 AM No.507660337
stallkl
stallkl
md5: 3d026bafc782761ae54e0efd4dcdcd6f🔍
>>507659102 (OP)
>(((OPen sourCe)))
jews are watching
Replies: >>507660666
Anonymous ID: 3+pKxkXnUnited States
6/17/2025, 2:14:36 AM No.507660486
Many games give you the source but require assets that you'd have had to purchase but can probably pirate easily. Those are Open Source, the definition of which also covers Free software.

I for one am happy to have bought Myth II, it works on all my computers to this day lol.
Anonymous ID: FvkgjYNCUnited States
6/17/2025, 2:15:53 AM No.507660666
>>507660337
open source is actually feudalism.
A person or a group owns it, and serfs write code which is then approved of.

Except within this analogy, nobody gets paid.
Replies: >>507661128
Anonymous ID: 3+pKxkXnUnited States
6/17/2025, 2:19:10 AM No.507661128
>>507660666
Open Source is an OK arrangement even if it's not Free. Espeically for old games for dead platforms. At least they are giving you a means to keep playing a beloved game even if they aren't giving you a license to the assets. For a lot of old games it might not even be possible to release the assets.

Free games from the old days mostly seem unpozzed too. Never seen any tranny shit in a Free game except for CDDA where there are trannies. But you can ignore or even murder them no problem if you want. Or mod them out.
Replies: >>507662193
Anonymous ID: fDja/f5I
6/17/2025, 2:26:47 AM No.507662193
>>507661128
Due to how ownership works, we can't just reasonably prevent the process of someone owning something and letting others do things with his property in accordance with his permission, even if the owner is a corporate body.
However it is a very justified and important point that whenever the thing we're talking about is not just simply open source but specifically free software, we don't forego the distinction.
Anonymous ID: lh5QlmNrUnited States
6/17/2025, 2:30:18 AM No.507662747
Does anyone remember the game I played on WinXP where you’re playing a gay going through layers of hell and there’s drugs like PCP that boost health or speed? It was a side scroller but you were moving from top to bottom