>reeee
I'll explain. Even IF Iran got nuclear weapons Israel has a massive head start with them, and possessing nuclear weapons now makes you vulnerable to a first strike by a nuclear armed opponent. In addition Iran possessing a nuclear weapon means that a 9/11 style attack with a nuke in near future, and Iran would be dumb enough to deny UN inspectors and celebrate any attack... sound familiar?
>reeee
What Iran should double down on is drones and more accurate hypersonic weapons, and if they wanted to go down the WMD road they should focus on ethnic targeting bioweapons.

Iran should have SUCKED my COCK

>>507686929 (OP)
Iran is definitely in the wrong here. Even if they did have nuclear weapons, most wars are fought through proxies and simply having them would mean that whatever insurgency wins could have access to nuclear weapons, like ISIS.

They need to have a culture besides being assholes.

Can you say one nice thing about Iran?