Who's ready for weapons of mass destruction round number 2?

Anyone make a bingo card for this shit yet?

>>507688242 (OP)
How big of a bomb can they actually have?
Anyone got the payload numbers for 600 grams of enriched directly into boom boom?
What's max damage looking like?

Worked to get the US to invade Iraq and likely will work to get the US directly involved in Iran

>>507688242 (OP)
>WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION
its the same playbook all over again

>>507688242 (OP)
I will work on a bingo card with Net Yahoo says the enemies are two weeks from having nooks being the free middle square. It won't be ready tonight.

>>507688354
shartgpt reckons 600 grams is nowhere near enough for a nuke

>>507688242 (OP)
t-that's enough for ten nukes!

>>507688242 (OP)
It's diabolical that I have been hearing about the "imminent nuclear danger" posed by random, starving camelfuckers in the middle of the desert my entire life and they keep pushing it.

>>507688631
Some other squares on the fly for sober me or anyone else making the card:
NZ-AU-CA (that's three) officials condemn nuclear again,
France opens a Uranium/Plutonium mine,
saw korea's school schedule screenshot in the wild,
American nuke,
Russian nuke,
Paki nuke,
Indian nuke,
American nuke test,
Russian nuke test,
North Korean nuke test,
sub disaster,
boat disaster,
plane disaster for the west,
plane disaster for the rest.
OK, 9 more squares to go.

>>507688242 (OP)
>>507688354
They aren't that dumb this time around they will just claim they blew up some cave with it inside.

>>507688894
I mean that isn't a city killer but that's a decent little tactical nuke, or you could literally just blow it up as a dirty bomb.

>>507688242 (OP)
These faggots are so bad at propaganda now.

>>507688894
nukes efficiency is like 1-5% of fissile material undergoing actual fission the rest just contribute to the fallout

>>507690111
So, we about to go to war over something that wouldn't even destroy Chicago?

>>507689949
Apparently they can't even convincingly falsify intelligence anymore despite all the advancements, really embarrassing actually

>>507690248
600g can't explode at all, you need something like 8kg of the thing and if the aussie calculation are right you must fission 15% of it to get a 20kt yield

>>507688354
Its useless if they can't deliver it on a hypersonic missle