>>507707191You got it wrong, the kikes couped the iranian govt in the 50s and made the figurehead shah become the ruler.
It used to be like norway that the king didn't hold real power. Then lets say norway gets anti-jewish government. then cia/mi6/mossad would work together with loyal to the king norwegian army to abolish norwegian parliament and put the pro-jewish king in total control.
This is what happened in iran with the shah mohammed reza.
And this ultimately led to the pisslamic regime in 70s because the shah was too kiked. That revolution was not supported by kikes, but it was supported by other muslims.
Ultimately yep there is bunch of old iranians that dont like the pisslamic regime either.
The thing is that original iranians are not arabs, just like everywhere in MENA the arab muslims are invaders.
But in Iran especially there is much higher percentage of original people left there and original ancestry, unlike rest of MENA where the original people are like 1-2%, reduced to a very small minority that doesnt have any power anymore and never will again
At least half of iranians are not arabs, so lot of them dont actually want strict pisslam
The situation is complex, however absolutely none of them are on the kike side, because kikes are who cause instability and destruction in middle-east all the time, so everyone hates them.