Why can't people understand pollution and global warming are serious and unironically think faggots and trannies are a bigger threat?

>>507767918 (OP)
Take it up with the chinks niggers and pajeets.

>>507767918 (OP)
What the fuck do you want from me you polish nigger. Look up who's causing 90% of the pollution.

>>507767918 (OP)
okay lets depopulate india and china

>>507767918 (OP)
>the fight against climate change is more important than the battle for truth

>>507767918 (OP)
cool. are you going to design a race based bioweapon (0% pollution, green solution) to take out the indians and the chinese or does that not vibe with your gay climate hoax cult?

poolaks are such dumb asses.

>>507768309
Where did I mention you? Apologize and get your Arabs back from my country.

>>507767918 (OP)
>Ultimately because the United States has a competitive advantage in oil vs. other superpowers. Thus it propagandizes its populace to ignore environmental concerns.
>Increasingly it's true that corporate America is so kleptocratric that it won't be to afford environmental regulations and/or corporate goons want another mansion.

>The 'naysayers' have a point in that it is ultimately a political narrative. For instance US intelligence uses organizations like Greenpeace to spread it's agenda abroad - when France was nuclearizing in the 70s this meant lower oil profits for Permian basin kleptocrats. French intelligence ended up running a terror campaign against Greenpeace including assassinations.


For comparison look at China's massive investment and promotion of EVs - ultimately this is because they have a competitive advantage in rare earths and very little oil.

>>507768863
>my country.

You haven't had a "country" since you sold it to globohomo (EU) for crumbs. Retarded poolak.

>>507767918 (OP)
>faggots and trannies
>kill birth rates
>one generation away from certain death
>well known solution

>pollution and global warming
>several generations away
>maybe it'll kill us all, maybe it won't
>people arguing that giving them money instead of the other guy can fix it

>>507767918 (OP)
Why is that man driving a hyabusa on the beach?

>>507769816
>>kill birth rates
You think that 1% of people who don't pop out babies because of being gay killed birth rates and not the 60% of people who only pop out 1 baby?

>>507767918 (OP)
Because they are? Both are propaganda, but trannies and faggots immediately interact with me on a daily basis. "Climate change" when every single prediction they've ever made has been hyperbolic, existentially manipulative, and factually incorrect.

>>507770275
Unironically, yes. When it is generally accepted by society that sex is not for procreation, it's easy to see that faggots get to have their fun and keep their whole paychecks instead of being forced to invest most of it in the next generation. So everybody else starts considering the economical implications of having kids and stop having kids.

>>507768215
Notice op has no ability to respond to this

>>507767918 (OP)

This is 4chan Brother, you search for water in the desert.

Look for "Rainbwo gatherings" shut down your pc, start living, start cleaning up, start getting Vegan.

This here, it was never the place for Change, its the place to realise on wich side youre on.

And i think you should know your side by now and start your way. It is the goal, to walk the way.

Greetings,
another /b/tard and Rainbow protector.

Because it's simply not a big deal.
Tell me one aspect of it that I should take seriously.

>ocean levels will rise
Yeah by like one fucking meter by the year 2100.
Who fucking cares, even most coastal cities tend to be several meters above sea level, not even 0.1% of land mass will be lost.
But even if the coastal cities would be flooded, it still wouldn't be a huge deal. We can relocate and build new cities along the new coastline.

>more natural disasters
No real evidence for that, see https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/number-of-natural-disaster-events.
I had gone up until the year 2000, most likely related to more consistent reporting on natural disasters in third world countries, but it mostly stabilized after that.
It's unlikely that natural disaster increased 10fold in the past 100 years and then stopped increasing so they've probably just stayed consistant for the past 100 years.
>but they are more deadly
Wrong again, see https://ourworldindata.org/natural-disasters.
Even in the case that disasters are more severe now (for which there is no hard evidence), we more than compensate for that by having superior technology for helping people in need compared to 100 years ago.

>it will get hotter and dryer and harder to cultivate the land
Then we will relocate to other places where it's colder now. Scandinavia, Greenland, Siberia, Canada, just some examples of vast places in which 90% is considered inhabitable due to the cold.
People need to stop being sentimental and realize that we've historically always been on the move. Stop crying about abandoned towns in southern Italy as if that shit was always meant to keep.
Be like your ancestors, quick to pack your bags and move to more habitable lands should the need arise. Sentimentality is not a virtue, man must be pragmatic at all times.

>>507767918 (OP)

404 is not an Error.
It is the answer to your Question.

>>507771514
>Then we will relocate to other places where it's colder now
Any plan how to do it? So far less like 1% of Africa and middle east moved to the first world and it already caused lots of (pretty reasonable) seething.

>>507771352
Animals can't even die in this jewish hell hole without some niggers vandalizing them and some faggots trying to turn them into a martyr.
kek

>>507773253
Not because it's crowded, it's because no one wants to live amongst barbarians.

When whites moved to undeveloped regions we have historically always prospered.
We will simply do the same again, go to currently empty regions, set up colonies, build structures, cultivate the lands, be prosperous.

the river is flowing, flowing and growing, back to the sea.
Mother Earth, they scaring me, you'r child i will always be, Mother earth they scaring me, back to the sea.

>>507767918 (OP)
Because they're not immune to propaganda.

It wouldn't even be an issue if nuclear power was more commonly used for energy. If want to know more go down the Henry Kissinger rabbit hole. Guess what, you don't even need to read the early life section at this point.

>>507768215
>>507771352
Herp.

>>507775504
Derp.
....I have more, what comes after derp...?

>>507767918 (OP)
'global warming' is used to cover up real pollution and destroy western industry

>>507767918 (OP)
I agree that they're extremely serious and some of the biggest threats facing humanity. One of the main reasons I hate the left (and particularly the Democratic Party) so much is that they've decided that faggots, trannies, and illegal shitskins are more important than the survival of the Earth and the human race and what little attention they pay to the environment anymore is totally focused on punishing regular people and trying to force us to buy overpriced inadequate electric shitboxes for a tiny reduction in emissions while ignoring the vast majority that's caused by industry and global shipping and constantly fearmongering and suppressing the only adequate clean power generation technology in existence.

>>507776269
This anon knows what's up, but muh Chernobyl and Fukushima

>>507767918 (OP)
I can hate more then 1 thing at a time, toilet cleaner

>>507767918 (OP)
i understand it
i dont give a shit because my plastic straw is a drop in the lake compared to india and china

>>507767918 (OP)
Global warming is horseshit.
Plastic on the other hand is a huge issue, local air pollution, heavy metals and other poisons, are all far more serious than global warming.

>>507767918 (OP)
They said you couldn't do it but you did it. You became a woman.