Anonymous
ID: kSAz7F4W
6/18/2025, 12:50:47 AM No.507787849
>yoorrook dropping
>In interim findings, Yoorrook, which means 'truth' in the Wamba Wamba language, uncovered evidence of grave and ongoing human rights abuses against First Peoples.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-06-18/yoorrook-justice-comission-walk-for-truth-telling-ends/105421782
>AnAl humiliation ritual.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-06-18/federal-politics-live-june-18/105428944
>a poof can call you a disgusting human being but you can't point out that they get shit on their dicks.
>Mr Greenwich referred to Mr Latham as a "disgusting human being" and in reply, Mr Latham took to Twitter, now X, to say: "Disgusting How does that compare with …" before describing sexual activity in graphic terms.
>Mr Greenwich's counsel, Prue Bindon, told the tribunal each of the statements constituted both unlawful homosexual vilification and sexual harassment.
>Ms Bindon said the "crude, explicit language" of the statements to describe the presumed sexual acts of Mr Greenwich was "designed to promote severe disgust or strong aversion".
>The defamation proceedings resulted in Mr Latham being ordered to pay $140,000 for non-economic loss and aggravated damages, and substantial costs.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-06-16/mark-latham-alex-greenwich-at-ncat-alleged-unlawful-comments/105423308
>oh and Greta getting dicked apparently.
>In interim findings, Yoorrook, which means 'truth' in the Wamba Wamba language, uncovered evidence of grave and ongoing human rights abuses against First Peoples.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-06-18/yoorrook-justice-comission-walk-for-truth-telling-ends/105421782
>AnAl humiliation ritual.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-06-18/federal-politics-live-june-18/105428944
>a poof can call you a disgusting human being but you can't point out that they get shit on their dicks.
>Mr Greenwich referred to Mr Latham as a "disgusting human being" and in reply, Mr Latham took to Twitter, now X, to say: "Disgusting How does that compare with …" before describing sexual activity in graphic terms.
>Mr Greenwich's counsel, Prue Bindon, told the tribunal each of the statements constituted both unlawful homosexual vilification and sexual harassment.
>Ms Bindon said the "crude, explicit language" of the statements to describe the presumed sexual acts of Mr Greenwich was "designed to promote severe disgust or strong aversion".
>The defamation proceedings resulted in Mr Latham being ordered to pay $140,000 for non-economic loss and aggravated damages, and substantial costs.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-06-16/mark-latham-alex-greenwich-at-ncat-alleged-unlawful-comments/105423308
>oh and Greta getting dicked apparently.
Replies:
