Would the world have less wars if women ruled it?

women have been quota ruling it for the past give or take 25 years, 35 if consider Bill just a Puppet of Hillary

>>507792556 (OP)
No because women are weak and would just be immediately conquered by men.

If women ruled the world, then Wars would be every 29 days on the dot, and they would only last 36 hours, after which both sides beat the shit out of the other side, they apologize and try to go back to the way things were before.

With men they wait 50 or 150 years, and then we murder everything that moves.

>memeflag
>1 post by this ID
>stupid retard question
you are posting in a bot thread

>>507792556 (OP)
built for bbc

>>507792556 (OP)
No.
>proof
Look at female monarchs
Sage because you are a lazy nigger OP

>>507792556 (OP)
They already do, everything men do is for women
Ask any man would he work as hard as he did to be rich and succesful if there were no women around, he'd say no

>>507792556 (OP)
how women run things:
https://thehistorianshut.com/2018/10/04/the-cold-blooded-revenge-of-empress-dowager-lu-against-her-rival-lady-qi/
TLDR she had her rival literally made into a pig

>>507792556 (OP)
yea prolly

>>507792556 (OP)
There would be less wars in that there would be no humans left.

>>507792556 (OP)
The world would have less of everything.

>>507792556 (OP)
>early 2000s Canadian qts
It was a better time.

>>507792955
Checked

>>507792556 (OP)
Historically female rules declare more wars and commit considerably more genocides than male rules. So no, we would have more wars and genocides because women are adult sized children throwing daily tantrums.

>>507792674
/thread

>>507792556 (OP)
There'd be no civilization to rule over if women ran it.

Sex with Avril Lavigne's shoes

>>507792556 (OP)
>IM THE BEST DAMN THING THAT YOUR EYES HAVE EVER SEEN
bitch's so smug
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UFgROyt6ank

>>507792556 (OP)
>dude, wanna crash the burger joint?

>>507792556 (OP)
Yeah. The first assertive guy would bang them all and take over.

>>507792556 (OP)
my buddy has 5 kids with a bitch that used to look like her, now her cute bitchface isn't so cute. she's ignorant and annoying as fuck. still might tho

>>507792556 (OP)
No, but they would find a way to blame men somehow for the wars they start.

>>507792556 (OP)
Women are not equal at all. The biggest psyop is brainwashing men into thinking its correct to see women as equal. Its fucked us all.

Straight white men discovered, invented, conceived and made everything.

This is essentially why any criticism of us is toothless - without straight white men, you'd be living in a hovel.

Look around you right now. Look at every item in the room you are in.
Who imagined, invented, designed and manufactured it?
Who dug the raw materials that made EVERYTHING IN YOUR ROOM out of the ground?
Who made the machines that dug the raw materials out of the ground to make the items in your room right now?

Straight white men did

Women and minorities have literally achieved nothing over thousands of years and are now considered "equal". No wonder their horse is so high.

They are not our equal. We are superior

Women and minorities demanded equality and straight white men stopped working LMFAO. Because equality for straight white men means achieving as much as women and minorities have - NOTHING

https://i.4cdn.org/wsg/1749549128021806.mp4

Name the most successful and accomplished woman or minority inventor, discoverer, or pioneer in any field at any time in history. Something that had never been done previously.

PLEASE NOTE THIS IS A COMPLETELY OPEN QUESTION - THERE IS AN ANSWER.

WHO IS IT?

>>507793460

Women are just subtly evil.

>>507793460
oh no

>>507792556 (OP)
It would have wars that give women validation.

>>507792556 (OP)
we've had plenty of female rulers in history and they all manage to fuck things up so bad that more war, death, disease, and genocide happen as a result

"Redpill" was just removing your derptarded "tuch muh pp" delusional simping for women. Redpill was about seeing women clearly for who and what they are. You think it's bad because "DATING SHITLER NAZIBADGE!" that women poop into the brains of manipulatible simps like you. You are desperate for an enemy you can defeat easy. You want "tuch muh pp" cred with women. We tried to tell you the truth. We found out we have to send simptards straight into TORMENT.

You deserve it for being weak.

Women are delusional about reality and think with their "personal unstable, childish, feelings" while ignoring everything else, including their kids. Women cannot survive alone, so what does that mean about female survival needs? Women must prioritise themselves, AND ONLY THEMSELVES. Men are strong enough to survive alone and bring someone, however men are delusional about women. You get the "tuch muh pp" old-man-brain-fog because of your simping for "tuch muh pp".

>>507792556 (OP)
She stole her style from the cool kids, she's nothing but a fraud.

>>507793460
i wonder if docs are pumping her full of steroids for lyme, that bloats you up and you can only watch

>>507792556 (OP)
>April Lasagna

>>507792556 (OP)
No, we'd probably have a new one pop up about every 28 days or so.
Nonstop war.

>>507792556 (OP)
>cunt lead
Yeah, they bring prosperity.

>>507792556 (OP)
We'd be stuck in a hellish stone age, but then we wouldn't even have the capacity to even cross the seas. So yeah, technically.

>>507792556 (OP)
It wouldn't even function. There's not a single country where majority women rule, and even when a lot of them are in positions of leadership like in the West, nothing gets done by them. The real shit is all handled by men.

>>507792556 (OP)
>less wars
>if women ruled
we just happily avoided one by outvoting one, but looks like the jooz have succeeded

Lol, no

No.

If women ruled the world everything would go to shit and no rules would be enforced leading ultimately to total anarchy everywhere out of which people with the strongest will to power, which are ultimately men, will rise again to rule over those without strong will to power (women and other weak men)

>memeflag slide thread 1pbtid
>9000 replies

die in a grease fire, retards

>>507793265
Please just fucking nuke us. We've been over run.

Women are worse, way worse, and too emotional
All girls 'school are a nightmare, my sister told me many stories of bullying
I unironically believe women are more cruel than men, and also way more stupid
Just check history, matriarchal societies never work

>>507792556 (OP)
they would flatten countries that have prettier women

>>507793460
>that pic... she's kinda pretty...
First thing I'd do is put her on a mycum only diet.

>>507793460
what has time done to all the girls that were hot when I was a teen

>>507792556 (OP)
there were actually way more wars under female monarchs in the past

>>507792556 (OP)
Yes.
There'd be one war in which they launch all the fucking nukes because they don't like Becky's face, after which the survivors will be so scattered they never meet each other again.

>>507792556 (OP)
The world would enter war every month on the same week. Women are not the more calm sex. At all

If women ruled the world then they would exclusively breed with tall 70-IQ psychopaths and humanity would go back to living in caves. They're subhumans, they aren't compatible with civilized society, they have subhuman unga bunga brains.

>>507793460
>Hey Hey You You I don’t like your Braphog
>No Way No Way I think you need a new one

>>507792556 (OP)
Depends whether auntie flow or the Red Barron come to town.

>>507792556 (OP)
If anything, there would be more wars because women would view men as disposable.