Anonymous
ID: iFFU7ezX
6/18/2025, 10:03:59 PM No.507895518
rhetorically.
I watched this video in support of Tucker Carlson's position.
In the clip he uploaded beforehand he did btfo Ted Cruz and I was expecting more of that.
However while his line of questioning was good, his argumentation wasn't.
The segment about AIPAC was good, but he wasn't really able to nail Ted Cruz down.
Ted Cruz made a good case why he's supporting Israel and why he's paid by AIPAC.
It was a retarded Christcuck response, but he avoided looking like a corrupt tool.
(Btw someone really needs to dismantle this retarded position from a Christian perspective, but Tucker didn't.)
Claiming that AIPAC is a foreign lobby is logical, but you need some hard evidence to take away Ted Cruz's plausible deniability.
At the most he made Ted Cruz look naive which is not enough.
Then when it came to foreign policy in the past, Ted Cruz just had the better reasoning.
He did convincingly explain most of his positions from a risk-reward perspective.
Also Tucker really does have a soft spot for Putin for some reason.
Most importantly they didn't even go into discussing Iran AT ALL.
That exchange about population size and ethnic makeup was the deepest they got into the topic.
This was a missed opportunity. They spent most of the time discussing other shit where Tucker could not make much of a dent.
I watched this video in support of Tucker Carlson's position.
In the clip he uploaded beforehand he did btfo Ted Cruz and I was expecting more of that.
However while his line of questioning was good, his argumentation wasn't.
The segment about AIPAC was good, but he wasn't really able to nail Ted Cruz down.
Ted Cruz made a good case why he's supporting Israel and why he's paid by AIPAC.
It was a retarded Christcuck response, but he avoided looking like a corrupt tool.
(Btw someone really needs to dismantle this retarded position from a Christian perspective, but Tucker didn't.)
Claiming that AIPAC is a foreign lobby is logical, but you need some hard evidence to take away Ted Cruz's plausible deniability.
At the most he made Ted Cruz look naive which is not enough.
Then when it came to foreign policy in the past, Ted Cruz just had the better reasoning.
He did convincingly explain most of his positions from a risk-reward perspective.
Also Tucker really does have a soft spot for Putin for some reason.
Most importantly they didn't even go into discussing Iran AT ALL.
That exchange about population size and ethnic makeup was the deepest they got into the topic.
This was a missed opportunity. They spent most of the time discussing other shit where Tucker could not make much of a dent.
Replies: