>>507915575>You can’t be delusional and “live and let live” with regimes that are actively engaged in destabilization of American allies.I'm sorry but you have just now described Communist interventionist ideology.
First of all, the whole idea of "allies" is nonsense in international relations, because if you have many allies, then you indirectly proclaim yourself the world-police through a desire to "protect" them. This is no different from Communist regimes spreading "world revolution" through state-building.
>Cllassical liberalism recognizes diplomatic measures not sitting and watching things turn to shit.absolutely not, you half-brain-celled shitskin
Classical liberalism is the definition ot "live and let live", and the only time classical liberalism allows POTENTIAL intervention, is when the lives of societies/communities are in danger of a humanitarian crisis or genocide. That's it. But classical liberalism endorses and allows the existence of different political, economic and religous systems.
Your brain is psyop'd by the "End of History" nonsense, which neocons in the US follow as a strategy - overthrow every country in the world, or bomb it into submission, "because our system is better"