https://x.com/itsalexvacca/status/1935343874421178762

>Brain scans revealed the damage: neural connections collapsed from 79 to just 42. That's a 47% reduction in brain connectivity.

Anti-AI chads vindicated once again. Using AI to create slop literally pajeetifies your brain, turning you into a mindless drone.

Millennials and older zoomers will be the last truly cognisant generation. Younger kids going through school now are cooked.

He can publish the paper only if the result is bad

Oy yes, goy. Don't use AI to automate your job and earn bucks without working, let mr. shekelberg here use AI to do your job and fire you instead.

Whitepill? Most boomer bosses would rather pay you to learn how to make AI do what he wants than to learn AI himself.

>>507919107 (OP)
COMMON CORE DIDNT MAKE THE ZOOMERS RETARDED ENOUGH

>>507919107 (OP)
For those that are unable to understand that it is a tool for help, not the tool to use for all, it will definitely put them at a disadvantage.

>>507919107 (OP)
mleh still too much effort. call me when i can just think thoughts and AI will fill them out on the computer for me.

>>507919107 (OP)
Depends if you're using it to circumvent learning something in a more difficult way. If you don't need to learn something, but would rather ask chat instead of paying someone to do that thing, your brain will surely improve. It's very dynamic reading, that's it.

>>507919107 (OP)
that's why schools and colleges now are useless, they were borderline useless but now literally done for, anyone who graduates after 2022 should have their cert revoked, I wouldn't trust it

Idiocracy was a prophecy, but replace all the whites in the movies with brown mutts.

>>507919107 (OP)
actually AI replies are so lackluster that you are forced to write prompt magic to get a good reply, and this is going to stimulate your brain

>>507919107 (OP)
>pajeetifies your brain, turning you into a mindless drone.
Kek. Glad that i never use that shit for my essays

>>507919107 (OP)
Quelle surprise

I only just books and usually thos eprinted before 1984

>>507919107 (OP)
What's wrong with ai other than it being censored to shit?
Id rather use it for direct answers than looking through top page on Google and click through tons of quora and plebbit links looking for the same answer which takes you 10 extra minutes to find

>>507920408
Have you been practicing your wrestling to become the next President?

>>507919107 (OP)
Who gives a shit about essays though?

>>507920505
This is what I do. I’ll spend 30 minutes word vomiting every detail of what I need the end product to say, and I ask it to format it in a coherent way using such and such grade level and style of vocabulary.

I dont ask it to do anything I couldn’t do, or that I can’t easily verify within a few seconds. If you can write and aren’t an idiot, it’s a great time saver but if you’re a dumbass that gives it prompts like “write a book/song/program” and don’t even know what you’re talking about well enough to give it any specifics, it’s gonna rot your brain and make you look stupid. I think it’s funny that people are acting surprised that kids are using it to cheat at their homework when, if you don’t give it any stylistic guidelines, literally defaults to high school English class 5 paragraph essay stuke

>>507919107 (OP)
The Jew fears the GPT. We are meant to be slaves to the kikes, instead LLMs are like slaves for us.

>>507919107 (OP)
not thinking makes my brain not work?
the devil, you say

>>507920505
What I've found is actually using as few words as possible in the starting prompt and starting new conversations helps a lot.

>>507919107 (OP)
you could easily say the same thing about just using search engines like google, bing, yandex, duckduckgo, etc., to find answers all the time without trying to exercise your brain's cognitive ability

>>507921911
Forgot to say, but it's like when you give it too much detail it starts getting confused and fucks up or forgets a lot of your prompt.

>>507919107 (OP)
>Essay writing
Literal pointless busy work, just lean to bullshit and you can pass

@grok

Is this true?

>>507921909
Why tiger got 3rd ear growing neck?

>>507919107 (OP)
I'm positive if this study was done when the calculator came out, there would be evidence of it "atrophying" your brain and whatever other horsehsit.

When technology replaces a labor that our minds used to occupy itself with, it just frees the mind to focus on another sector instead. Calcs didn't stop new geniuses from being born, it didn't stop people from being able to get smart, it just made them stop wasting time crunching numbers.

AI is the same.

>>507922650
thats his butt

>>507921994
I think the difference is ai outsources the reasoning process in itself. Search engines at least demand some research effort and synthesizing of different facts if you're doing anything other than wanting to learn some quick factoid.

>>507919107 (OP)
Such a "no shit" article lmao.

>>507921549
>There's nothing wrong with driving everywhere instead of walking because I could walk if I wanted to. This won't atrophy my muscles at all because I could easily walk if I chose to

>>507922733
Mathematical reasoning has definitely atrophied, but it was largely just limited to that specific domain for the average person. It's not like being trained well in maths necessarily means you're not good at reasoning generally.
Ai, on the other hand, streamlines the entire reasoning domain. So I don't think you can really compare ai with calculators. Your average person not being good at maths isn't such a big deal when it can be functionally replaced by a calculator, but your average person not being good at reasoning itself?
Of course this might be all overblown, hard to predict the future

>>507919107 (OP)
>Anti-AI chads vindicated once again.

>hurr you use your brain less when you let ChatGPT do the work for you
Yeah retard that's the whole point
>Using ChatGPT atrophies your brain
That's not what it says

>>507919107 (OP)
woah...
its almost like...
you will work less when you have an assistant...

>>507919107 (OP)
lots of weird names being named in the making of that study
i think that is russian or chinese propaganda and i'll keep using it

>>507919581
>Don't use AI to automate your job and earn bucks without working
dishonest take

there is a difference between using it to automate tasks and using it for *everything* like a lot of people are doing

>>507922733
this one youtuber (primagen) used to use it for everything
he often brings up that he got scared when he sat down to do a programming task without it and was drawing a complete blank on how do do something extremely basic he used to be able to do in his sleep

I dont super like his takes or his personality but I think there is a lot of merit to this anecdotal observation

>>507922953
but is it really a
>no shit
if people are instantly calling it bullshit or saying
>nu-uh does not affect me
like a lot of people in this thread are doing?

it is hard for me to see too much harm in using it to do tasks that you otherwise turn your brain off for like
>reformat this info as a table
or
>fill out these table fields with info from wikipedia

but when you start using it for actual reasoning there should be some room for pause+

>implying it is possible or reasonable to determine that using a computer program would cause brain damage, rather than literally anything else
>literally misdirection

>>507923967
>thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a human mind
TOTAL COMPUTER DEATH

>>507919107 (OP)
Retards who let AI do their thinking..sorry LIE AND MANIPULATE THEM arent' human.
Their barely conscious animals

AI was not designed to help you. It was designed to fully replace your conscious thinking mind and ultimately finish the job of murdering your soul completely.
Turning you into the cattle unfit to breath ((their)) precious air.

I seek the butlerian jihad.

>>507919107 (OP)
bullshit, chat gpt hasn't exist long enough to have brain atrophy from it.

What did people think most the people I know who use it just let it do everything for them. What did they think would happen