Luigi x100

No communism/marxist/stalinist/tankie shit. Free markets but with asset caps and direct executive liability.

The French revolutionaries were rich and killed many of the poor for not supporting them.

>>507936903
>>507936870
Nothing is free except the boots to be licked.

>>507936698 (OP)
french revolution was done by jews
maybe you can argue it needed to be done but the outcome was not good for anyone

Not sucking richfag dick would be heckin commulism

If you think there's anything objectionable about 1 person having all the money and everyone else being their slave, you are a tranny who merely hates people who are better than you

>>507937036
>the outcome was not good for anyone
Historically that’s the case for the vast majority of revolutions and civil wars. You almost always end up even worse off than where you were.
Unfortunately there’s no way to know how it’s going to turn out ahead of time.

>>507936698 (OP)
No we dont need a (((revolution))) we already know the final solution to our problem.

>>507937725
This. The revolution will bring the jew world order where you'll own nothing and be unhappy.

its actually much simpler and succinct and the Unabomber laid it all out for everyone, technology is the road to ruin

>>507936698 (OP)
The revolution was caused by jews to genocide christians

>>507938014
Good, fuck christkikes

>we need a Luigi
>why don't you be the Luigi
>*crickets*
1 murder by Luigi will fuel 5 years of impotent larping as people vent their revolutionary tendencies through memes and cheeky inside jokes alone while never actually doing anything substantial.

>>507936698 (OP)
The fire rises brothers

>>507936698 (OP)
Except in the 1700s the wealth was real stuff. Now it is funny jew money that doesnt actually represent anything. Retard.

>>507936698 (OP)
you need to read some history my fren. revolutions are terrible and should be avoided.

>>507936698 (OP)
He is white rich motherfucker who wasted 500k on coverting a shitty hummer into electric and distroys expensive devices for clicks .
His head will be choped too

>>507936870
>asset caps
if there are asset caps its not really a free market, but I kinda agree honestly, people should be able to do whatever they want but without direct ownership past a certain threshold, the reason is that you can only keep that much assets because of the military, and the military is the state, so it only makes sense that when the assets are above what you can personally control, they get ''taken''. You can have money as long as its invested but you can only have certain amount of money as liquid for non business spending

>>507938318
>>507938402
>>507938405
Saaaars

>>507936870
>asset cap
Its not free market then

>>507938118
Don't reply to me jeetkike

>>507936903
The American revolutionaries were all wealthy landowners who were pissy about having to pay some taxes

>>507938318
>Except in the 1700s the wealth was real stuff. Now it is funny jew money that doesnt actually represent anything. Retard.
Funny money or not, the buying power was ~10x lower back then. People won't chimp out as long as they have food on the table.

>>507936698 (OP)
guillotines are pretty easy to build.

>>507938540
>>507938553
Large enough asset piles distort markets. There are always maximum sizes determined by physics to anything in the universe, this isn't any different. Market distortions are always bad, and an assert cap avoids those distortions. Welcome to free markets that aren't just a theory exercise.

>>507938663
what are you basing that on? buying power 10X lower? for what?

>>507936870
Enjoy your revolution.

>>507938624
And they didn't massacre the poor.

>>507938663
People don't change until it's more painful to stay the same.

>>507936698 (OP)
The American version of the French Revolution would just be poor ghetto niggers flooding into the suburbs and slaughtering white people en mass.

>>507936698 (OP)
Robespierre and his Jacobin friends set a bad example of a revolution though.

>>507939050
They were happy to conscript the lower classes to fight for them (and murder natives).

>>507936870
So basicaly state made on principles of decentralization and freedom.
You cant have freedom without decentralization. Its simply imposible.
Lawless populations always have mechanisms preventing acumulation of power from happening.

>>507938813
Scratch that, that was the norm before the famine.
>According to Sylvia Neely's A Concise History of the French Revolution, the average 18th-century worker spent half his daily wage on bread. But when the grain crops failed two years in a row, in 1788 and 1789, the price of bread shot up to 88 percent of his wages.
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/arts-culture/when-food-changed-history-the-french-revolution-93598442/
Bread would need to cost $50 to match the poverty during years before the French Revolution.

Damn that jerry rigged guy is a fucking retard. He also wont do shit because he's a bitch.

>>507939335
>muh white people
I know white people who throw their other white people under a bus for shekels.

>>507938318
Doesnt represent anything but you are forced to use it and making alternatives is ilegal.

>>507939221
People who change are outliers, its not common at all, plasticity drops significantly.
The real blackpill is not only that iq is genetic, but also that what you become mostly depends on your childhood habits, what you learned and so on. Yes some can scam their way up but its not the 1970s anymore where some random smart guy could just mog everyone.

>>507938756
read what I said please

>>507938813
your power was local, not global so Id say that it was lower even though there was less competition

>>507936698 (OP)
Poor people are financially retarded and will live paycheck to paycheck no matter how much money they make. That’s the real problem.

>>507937036
>>507936903
Same playbook today. The 1% jews pretend to be on the side of the 99% to kill the rest of the top 1% so they can dominate.

>>507938624
>The American revolutionaries were all wealthy landowners who were pissy about having to pay some taxes
It had more to do with the Crown preventing them from stealing more land from the Indians in the Ohio Valley and making smuggling unprofitable than taxes. Taxes are for little people. That was just how they inflamed the masses.

>>507938663
>he buying power was ~10x lower back then
Depends on what you want to buy.

While an ordinary iPhone might be worth more than a whole country in the 1700s, even richest billionaires today don't own anything like pic related, though they claim to be richer than their 18th century predecessors.

>>507939586
I call bulshit on this most poeple at that time were pesants. No one would work at factory if that was the case.

>>507936698 (OP)
Luigi should have shot a bunch of investment bankers and real estate developers.
CEOs aren't the problem, landlords are the problem.

>>507936698 (OP)
>We need a revolution
You first, be the spark that lights the inferno, we're right behind you!

>>507936698 (OP)
What if France was able to pacify all those peasants with entertainment and fatty foods

>>507936870
No. Do not limit the upside potential otherwise everyone gets lazy and someone's going to cheat anyways. Executive liability will do. But it has to be really low bar for the process to work. Mob justice style. It'll basically guarantee that the elite are constantly trying to use their wealth to purchase favor with normies in the form of good deads and public works.

>>507939690
>read what I said please
Yeah, after rereading, you're still wrong, ANY accumulation above a certain amount represent distortion beyond money: control, influence, power, etc all go haywire as you get big. Even if you let equities grow to INF it's still ownership, it's still money, it will be used to distort markets.

>>507939862
Our billionaires couldn’t afford to build a modern chateau of the same quality.

>>507939910
Insurance company CEOs are just one example of a long list of rent seekers who should face the wall

>>507936698 (OP)
If you actually look at the graphs, it’s the same distribution as before WWI. After the war ended the wealth inequality fell and WWII accelerated it to a low in the 1970s. Only in the 80s did it pick back up and March up to pre WWI levels. Does this imply we need another total war?

>>507938624
Taxation without representation. Not hard to believe. If you had an american bone in your body you'd be chomping at the bit to kill government employees right now.

>>507940019
No. You don't understand how market distortions work. It's power, not just money. "I'll pull my shares and crash sell them, tanking your value!" "I'll fund your money losing woke campaign of sticking ugly lez fatties in your movies, go for it with your social engineering attempts!" Stop thinking from the front door and realize that money exerts power quietly and dangerously from the hands of people more and more and more - as cash accumulates - removed from reality.

>>507940241
you need to be able to differentiate between the actual goals, and the way those goals are embelished and presented to a public. A great example of this is Israel genociding the palestinians. It is clear they want to drive them out, but they wont say it clearly in public.

>>507939862
>Depends on what you want to buy.
>While an ordinary iPhone
I'm mainly talking about stuff like daily groceries.
>even richest billionaires today don't own anything like pic related
Sure, because you only had to pay an artisan 2-3x the wage of a peasant, while nowadays you'd need to pay them something like $100-200K. Anything handcrafted essentially became less accessible after the industrial revolution.
>>507939896
>I call bulshit on this most poeple at that time were pesants.
Afaik France was overpopulated by 18th century standards. Also, peasants still had to pay taxes.
>No one would work at factory if that was the case.
Non-land owning laborers trapped in the cities didn't really have a choice.

>>507936698 (OP)
The only reason the french revolted was because the people were living in tremendously horrible conditions.
Rampant hunger, arbitrary prosecution, squalor.
Those problems simply aren't in the US today. At least nowhere near as bad as it was then. As long as the people are fed, not constantly hounded by the law, have clean living conditions and sufficient entertainment (distractions) Not only will a revolt not happen, it's not needed.
Just because someone has a million times more money than you do, it doesn't mean your life gets worse because of it.
Sure, things could be better for the avg person, but that's always true. YOU could be the one with a million times more money.
And if you're honest, you'd admit that that's what you want. You don't care about equality, fairness or justice, you want the power and wealth.
Until people are starving, and with nothing better to do but notice they are starving, it's never going to happen.
So, shut up, enjoy your electricity, tendies and sportsball. Because at the very least, they will never be taken away.

>>507936698 (OP)
isn't that bald a youtuber? literally made his wealth from a meme 'job', i bet he already have multimillion house etc and talking about revolutions, lmao

>>507940041
ok you might be right, but I think there is still a need to have someone as the head and the best choice is the founder. They shouldnt get as wealthy specially in recent tech companies that massify so much just for selling software.
How do we motivate them to grow and innovate?
Idk works well in China although they have some wealth accumulation, I think thats due to america existing tho. Can we motivate people if its not with wealth accumulation? maybe smaller wealth accumulations? maybe other things? But it would require massive society changes that are not realistic short term. What do you suggest without sounding like a faggot?

>>507936698 (OP)
...which is why revolution wont happen.

>>507939862
they can buy this for sure, they just dont because they dont want to ''waste'' money. Back then you probably had a bunch of people to invite and do nothing all day together

>>507940564
>Those problems simply aren't in the US today. At least nowhere near as bad as it was then. As long as the people are fed, not constantly hounded by the law, have clean living conditions and sufficient entertainment (distractions) Not only will a revolt not happen, it's not needed.
Yep. Most people don't realize how poor people were before the industrial revolution. (picrel is in 1990 USD, so multiply the figures by 2-3x)

>>507940437
Just like how the masked ICE raids are framed as being about enforcing the law, when they’re really about making America completely radioactive to anybody even thinking about immigrating or visiting.

>>507936698 (OP)
They did not solve the problem in 1790, they put into power the retarded accademia of the time, Robespierre signed the chart of the citizen rights with one hand and signed the paper to send dissidents to die on the fire stakes of the secular inquisition. They stole all the shit from the rich and they printed coupon/quotas that were worth a portion of the bounty to be used as fiat currency and predicably they overprinted it.

But the absolute worst was, as I said the intelligentia, the guys who thought they understand what was best for everyone literally came up with new out-of-touch bullshit one after another, (my favorite was the creation of artificial time. You guys should read about it.) the people hated them with a voracious passion.

Anyway, revolution leaders could not agree about anything so they shot each other and the last left was shot by the people because of all that understanding of the world they could not figure out how to get some fighting-capable dude on their side. People were angry due to inflation and getting tyrannized by retards. Afterward, people choose to be led by an emperor.
The emperor did the equivalent of WW for 1800 standard. Got defeated by an alliace of the rest of the world basically and the French killed each other for a century almost for differences over political views.

>>507940621
>What do you suggest without sounding like a faggot?
Fuck dude, I don't know, the actual number probably requires some serious analytical work to find out. I can guess at some stopping points: when passive investment income reaches the point in which the total becomes "runaway" -- I don't know what that number is, but I think it can be figured out. This is the point in which "work" is no longer necessary to increase the pile past some multiple value of growth ..

>>507940924
>Muh money

You're Jewish.

>>507936698 (OP)
>>507936870
Nuclear War Globally

>>507940621
>What do you suggest?
How about another stopping point in which the organization no longer has any risk? Or its total risk can no longer exceed that of it's value? This is crazy shit like "too big to fail" or "Berkshire Hathaway."

>>507936698 (OP)
How much of that French wealth was liquid though? Why would you punish someone for possessing invested assets like company ownership? You want the money to flow, not to be used frivolously.

>>507936698 (OP)
guillotines are pretty neat

>>507936698 (OP)
fuck Luigi, fuck commies, fuck rich people, fuck poor people, fuck average people.

>>507941075
You are retarded. The Romans were as anti-kike as you could get, yet they still used money. If you don't like the USD comparison, consult the following table: https://www.forumancientcoins.com/numiswiki/view.asp?key=ancient%20wages%20and%20prices

>>507941371
The point is they lived even without much money, fake and gay

>>507941341
Based

>>507936870
>>507938540

Even if asset caps were like $75M. No human needs more than that and it’s enough where people are still incentivized to be productive/innovate.

Imagine how much capital could be funneled into societally productive efforts if all wealth above $75M was spent on infrastructure, healthcare, education, research, etc.

>>507941454
>Three days work would buy a cheap pair of shoes, nearly a month, a shirt. Carpenters, bakers, plasterers and tessellated floor workers all get double this, about the same as an elementary school teacher, who is paid 50 denarii a month per pupil.
Yeah, ok. Try living like this. You'd go insane, no matter how frugal you claim to be.

>>507936698 (OP)
All commies are backed by bankers

>>507936870
It'll never be a free market when McDonalds millionaires can own a thousand franchises, but a citizen can't sell $2 hamburgers from a roadside grill without government shutting him down, ANYWHERE in America.

>>507939862
that hunk of shit isn't using gold for walls lol, it's not that expensive per sqm, its just enormous. billionaires could easily build something way nicer than that, there's just no reason to because no one would use it. those were for multiple large families, staff, guards, back before there was transportation and internet
people only build expensive floating estates now (yachts) because niggers can't swim

>>507936903
Correct. Only in leftists' deranged mind was the revolution about wealth distribution.
It was in fact the bourgeois seizing power from nobles, one step in the descent into degeneracy.

>>507936698 (OP)
My thoughts:
1. white middleclass men allowed this to happen. they have the "pleb" wealth, the guns, and have done NOTHING except turn their anger towards the poor.
2. all this wealth inequality hasn't produced any good results. These companies that cry about taxes have already got massive tax cuts and still produce garbage products and garbage consumer experience (try walking into Best Buy these days, it sucks).
3. Massive amounts of wealth has been dumped into private property, offshore accounts, and other places where it fails to improve society.

>>507941681
Yeah rates of trannyism and faggotry way higher today.