The internet is absolutely dead.
There's not a single anonymous chat app/website that is not a dysfunctional bot farm.
You'd think there'd be at least one, right? Supply and demand. Well there's none.

What else is missing from the internet that would've easily been provided in a non-psychojewish society? No need to mention jew free imageboard, we all know.

The bigger issue is the neverending poojeet infestation flooding formerly comfy sites.

Every website/app I've known, and I'm talking in general here, either doesn't exist anymore or has gone to shit, like 4chan. There is no replacement, there is no energy, attempts to recreate it. There is nothing left.

>>507955087 (OP)
the greed of man is immeasurable...
the vainglory...
the gluttony...
the sloth...
(...)
they burn down the world because they dont get their way and are incapable of coexistence
thats when the entity oversteps its authority
thats when the people need to cull the entity to contain the spread of the mind virus
what you and the rest of true anons are experiencing are symptoms to a certain congruent sum of mindsets
psychics are like "i, me, i , i ,i, demand this, demand that, ..."
open source idea was the platinum tier catalyst for this to filter the nature of man
so many good ideas and projects, so many die or get smothered by the hylic leechers, most people are sloths who just want to consume and complain about stuff instead of getting their ass up and doing something
remember ?
"why won't somebody do something ?"
(...)
yeah
thinking isn't going to get us anywhere, DO SOMETHING !

>>507955543
drop your memeflag and i'll throw you a straw you can hold onto

>>507955562
I've been thinking about this earlier today actually. The early internet was mostly open source because it was created by autistic hobbyists who did it for fun or only expected some tips and donations from people who like their work. Now the model is pay first then get shit. But not everyone is a programmer nor should be. I have my own work that will be released on similar terms to what I mentioned, but its not related to the internet. Saying just do something is not going to solve the problem. We need something more to funnel the energy and efforts of people who want to do something.

>>507955087 (OP)
Every time this is discussed there is always some fag who says "no it's not dead, look ur using it right now lol" and totally misses the point. They are either very young people, or leftists who are purposely being disingenuous.
What is there left to say? This is what happens when you let corporations run the internet. Governments love it because most dissent has been completely silenced.
We had a choice, an autistic gay retarded free internet, or a tightly controlled sterile gay internet. The world has sided with the latter.

i'm a fucking niggerfaggot for replying to a memeflag thread
fuck me

>>507955881
A mixture of money and enabling hedonism and degeneracy. Not much different from the real world. You cant have ownership and thus preserve quality without power, tanks or money.

We need quality music sharing as well as movie and film sharing. The destruction of actual media or removal is a disservice to everyone. Torrents aren't really at the level they've been, although I don't really torrent much any more.
The blockchain crypto services are just too convoluted for most people and a.i. just steamrolled it with actual function.
I really just hate charges for human interactions.

And why do you think revolutionaries in the past met behind closed doors before?
The internet is like going to the central plaza and scream out loud what you're talking about and then getting offended that someone heard you

>>507958256
This but even more importantly we need to physically store every piece of knowledge we can. Don't think they won't come for it. They've always erased as much culture as they could.
>>507958871
Is there even a single reliable web service where you can create private chat rooms that can't be infiltrated, shut down or surveillance by service owners or third parties?

>>507959019
Online? I don't think so, no.
In real life you have the same problem but least there you see the intent of people in the same room and if they slip up, you can deal with it without it being a fingerprint online for others to follow to you.
Real life gatherings of enclosed groups is not infiltrated as easily and you remove the whole AI problem from the get go (least until advanced, human like robots are invented)