>tfw USA wins the nuclear war

>>507962871 (OP)

>>507962871 (OP)
But loses the economical war against china

know the manticore will fool many princes

>>507962871 (OP)
greatest ally

>>507962871 (OP)
Implying you won't also suffer the consequences of nuclear winter

>>507963330
We lose 5 to 10 celcius max and miss the radioactive winds the cycle north. Here' the Jericho 3 missile range btw. Nothing but desert out there.

Aussie Chads will inherit US Brides?

>>507963444
>Spiteful mutants in Israel wont be able to samson option us
based.

>>507963330
there's no justification for anybody to nuke us
>being a usa ally

thats not enough i'm afraid

>>507963444
there's no justification for anybody to nuke me - i live hundreds of kilometers away from middle sized cities, and thousands from larger ones
starvation would be a problem thoughbeit

>>507963615
If i were the chinks, i would want to Nuke the cities with harbors the US could use to refuel and resupply.

Id probably also want to take out pinegap, and JORN

>>507963730
Are you on Samon's shitlist?

>>507963960
did you read my post bruce?

>>507963807
i just don't see it happening mate
either way it aint my problem (tasmanian)

>>507963960
>NYC, DC, LA
>the US cities with the largest amount of jews
lmao

>>507963730
sounds pretty good but also like you probably live near some sam sites that would be targeted in a preemptive strike. may the winds blow the radiation cloud in your favor

>>507964187
...why do English flags appear to be unable to read the English language?
i was fairly straightforward with my data
or is it that you only know imperial and not metric?

>>507964112
You might be right.
According to Grok they only have 600 nukes.
I ask Grok to see how it thinks China would allocate them.

In a hypothetical global war, China’s 600 nuclear warheads would likely be allocated as follows:

> United States: 250-300 warheads (military bases, command centers, nuclear sites).
> Japan: 50-75 warheads (U.S. bases like Okinawa, Yokosuka).
> South Korea: 30-50 warheads (Camp Humphreys, Osan Air Base).
> Australia: 20-50 warheads (Pine Gap, HMAS Stirling, RAAF Tindal).
> NATO/Europe: 50-75 warheads (Ramstein, UK bases, missile defenses).
> Reserve: 50-75 warheads (for second strikes).

>China would prioritize U.S. military and nuclear assets, with allies targeted to disrupt U.S. operations. Nuclear use risks catastrophic global fallout and retaliation, making it a last resort.

alright fine, my math was off
100+ km from middle sized cities, 1000+km from large cities
point still stands

>>507964334
Anon, I...All of the Northern Hemisphere will be in a Nuclear Winter Dustbowl...(That includes all of Spain)

>>507964732
>-2.5C for east cost of Aus
sounds comfy af mate. How does one kick off their nuclear "winter"

>>507964732
>-2.5C
oh, the horror
again, shipments of food would be the problem, not much else

>>507962871 (OP)
winners in nuclear war? Why u stupid like this? Who dropped you when u were a baby?

>>507963444
>>507964732
>antartcica minimally affected
>all those migrants going south to escape the radiation
Antarctichads, we eating good this nuclear war.

>>507963330
There wouldn't be enough fallout to cause a nuclear winter. Modern thermonuclear weapons rely on hydrogen fusion as the main explosive force which doesn't create radioactive isotopes (just fuses hydrogen into helium). The uranium or plutonium components produce fallout but because they're just used to trigger the fusion there's much less fallout than in conventional nuclear weapons.

Plus there's been over 2000 test detonations of nuclear weapons with no wider ecological effects, so the idea of a nuclear winter is absurd. Really only way a nuclear winter would be feasible would be upper atmosphere detonations of tens of thousands of cobalt salted nuclear weapons which nobody developed.

>>507963063
Bro, the U.S is losing it's economic war to itself. Not China. Based Xi Jinping is sitting over there weeping that his warped comrades in the U.S are too dumb to economics. His biggest trading partner too foolish to function.

>>507966600
>America should be happy to be a country which produces nothing where all wealth is theoretical and all grwoth is due to the pyramid scheme of the modern stock market

>>507965398
He thinks a 5m deep bunker will protect him. He doesn't know that everything will die and there won't even be bacteria for the next million years.

>>507962871 (OP)
>wins a nuclear war against a nation with no nuclear weapons