Has the tone shifted?
It sounds like we're now questioning if bunker busters will even definitively work.

>>507974827 (OP)
the bunker is 90+ meters underground surrounded by granite and high tech concrete.
its questionable if a bunker buster can bust it.

>>507974958
>high tech concrete.
doesn't even need to be high tech, it just needs to be angled and it would probably be sufficient to deter any sufficiently heavy conventional penetrator

>>507975097
it literally is high tech concrete tho, its called UHPC

>>507975369
if they have ultra high pressure concrete, then it's giga over since the penetrator sucks ass against it according to rocket sled tests.

>>507975427
they have and they developed this shit more than 10 years ago so its not like this is even real news, everyone knows about it.

it’s a super big bomb that digs in the ground and blows stuff up it’s not rocket science just keep dropping them until it’s blowed up the bunker or whatever

>>507975502
speaking of which, how expensive is this shit anyway? I imagine no-rebar concrete could be a huge commercial boon in terms of kicking out iron working union cucks.

>>507974827 (OP)
Im calling my dick the Massive Ordnance Penetrator.

make her pussy do the tricks

>>507974827 (OP)
Eh, there's always nukes.
Using nukes to destroy nukes has something poetic about it.

>>507975746
>We are going to first strike nuke someone to avoid nuking someone
How can the kikes even spin this one

>>507974958
a nuclear bunker buster could do it, but that's using a nuclear weapon so probably not going to happen

>>507976023
>iran was making biological weapons and the only way to neutralize it was with a nuclear blast

>>507974827 (OP)
Like all American weapons it's just marketing to justify the exorbitant budgets, claims 200ft penetration but would be surprised if it got through 20 feet of hard rock

>>507974827 (OP)
US reliance on air dominance has made them predictable and Iran knows the political landscape won't allow boots on the ground and ZERO chance a nuclear option is used offensively. Considering the USA couldn't do shit against the Houthis I'd say there's 0 chance these things work, they're outdated tech that everyone knows about and can prepare against. Unless there's some new top secret weapon the USA has then the Israelis are gonna have to start a land battle.

>>507975563
You can't just keep dropping them there are only 20 built. It would take at the minimum 3 to destroy the tunnel entrances.

>>507974827 (OP)
Just launch it at the three gorges dam

>>507975563
It’s an open question whether it significantly delays Iran’s nuclear program. Spoiler alert: it probably doesn’t. If that happens and the regime withstands the bombing, the diplomatic option is gone forever (if if even still exists) and you’d be forced to do a ground invasion that would kill millions and millions of people to stop Iran from getting the bomb. All because Netanyahu blew up the negotiator on the eve of negotiations. They wanted to make a deal.

>>507976257
>Israelis are gonna have to start a land battle
>flag
kek, how very optimistic of you

>>507976400
>>507976280
just keep building them the budget is like a bazillion dollars anyways

>>507976257
you have no idea what the situation with the houthis is you retarded subhuman. dealing with the houthis means declaring war on yemen which saudi arabia doesn't want. the houthis just hide among the civilians so there's nothing to do. if there was an actual war with yemen the houthi problem would be solved instantly

>>507976400
>They wanted to make a deal.
that is true, but Trump never wanted to make a deal
the mistake all you idiots are making is assuming Trump wants peace
Netenyahu never blew up anything, it was all very closely coordinated and Trump is 100 % pro war, his statements in the past several years prove it
it was Trump who crashed the peaceful nuclear deal with Iran in case you forgot

>>507976797
sure thing, you got humiliated live in front of the whole world

>>507976920
no, russia got humiliated in ukraine. you can go back to your containment thread now

>>507976797
>the houthis just hide among the civilians so there's nothing to do.
That never stopped you and the kikes before

>>507977316
you live in an alternate fantasy, shitskin. russains and iranians are the ones that target civilians. i like how all the /chug/ shills show up too. all the usual suspects

>>507977201
no, in ukraine, you again are being humiliated
>inb4 nafo talking points
that war is your war and you're losing it

>>507974827 (OP)
just build 10+ meters of mud above it to provent the bunker busters from coming in.

>>507977406
way to oust yourself as a glownigger
enjoy your downfall

>>507977406
Yeah Mr. air strike of peace, it's totally everyone else

>>507974827 (OP)
Im not a military man but can the Iranians not put up SOME kind of air defense at all if they know that the enemy is going to attack soon and they know the exact location and the exact weapon to be used which means specific planes?

>>507975746
>use real nuks to destroy fake and gay nuks
lol

>>507976280
>minimum 3 to destroy the tunnel entrances.
what would that even achieve? they can just make another entrance, probably already have prepared backups.

>>507974827 (OP)
>It sounds like we're now questioning if bunker busters will even definitively work.


Mountain rock is 2.5 to 3 times stronger than concrete.

If your operation failed the whole world will laugh at you while Iran will bomb the shit out of you and shut the Red Sea and the Hormuz straits.

My feeling says that the bomb has nt tested on mountains and it is going to be a huge clown fiesta that will make Iran angry for no reason.