There's no reason any one person should have more than 100 million dollars. Everything over that should be taxed 100% and redistributed through non-centralized programs for citizens. Prove me wrong.

>>507976509 (OP)
>Tax all multidisciplinaires
>Inflate monetary value so that everyone is one
>Steal everybody's money
Very clever if it weren't so goddamned obvious.

This but make it 10 dollars.

>>507976509 (OP)
I agree

>>507976509 (OP)
get a job

>>507977182
>dude just become a slave for the owner class I promise you will get rich too bro I promise!!!
Kys

>>507976509 (OP)
There should be some point of wealth inequality past which the upper tier with all the money gets it heavily taxed to being the ratio down an acceptable level, but that should be defined in relative rather than absolute terms. The point isn't that having wealth is bad but rather if it becomes too imbalanced then it's bad for the country

>>507976509 (OP)
I dont see why anyone even needs 100 million, make it 10 million

>>507976509 (OP)
Money is in play and generally isn't just cash, assets rapidly can rapidly change in value. This would amount to say an unrealized gains tax in equities. For the United States if the entirety of all wealth held by billionaires was somehow made liquid and seized without it causing economic strain, IE downward pressure due to mass selling stocks and real estate, it would be enough to cover Americas unfunded liabilities for a period of 18 months. In doing so you'd be selling the infrastructure to employee people as well. These are the lofty ideals made by people that don't understand how the world works. Increases in Taxes, a war on the rich if you will, is inevitable however it will not make a difference in our failing economies. Ironically high taxes on billionaires will also be paired with entitlement reform, like reducing retirement benefits and Medicaid first in novel terms via legislation and then in real terms via inflation. What will be levied on the rich will hit the poor twofold as atleast assets track with inflation.

>>507977584
Fair point. Maybe wealth should be forcibly redistributed beyond a certain threshold. Like say, if 1% own 90% of the economy, it should be reset. It would also drive innovation. The wealthiest do nothing but further enrich themselves by mere existence and ownership of assets and exploitation of the poor at that point.

Rich people invest their money, why take it away?

>>507976509 (OP)
Socialism is the future

>>507976509 (OP)
Then those people who have the resources and the knowledge to create billion dollar companies will just move to a country that isn't a communist shithole.

>>507978113
Yes, exactly, not to mention being able to totally buy off the political system

>>507976509 (OP)
i agree until i have over 100 million then i disagree

>>507976509 (OP)
>CEO makes 30-40 times more money than a worker
Still bearable.
>CEO makes 1000 times more money than a worker
Luigi time

>>507976509 (OP)
>redistributed through non-centralized programs for citizens
>>507977204
citizens like those?

>>507976509 (OP)
>n

Get a haircut. Lose the cap. Lose weight. Get a job.

>>507976509 (OP)
what if I need heart surgery and it costs $150 million?

>>507976509 (OP)
Just have the state kill the person that is bad for society to be that rich, whoever is bad with 101 million, would be also bad with 99. By setting a hard cap on wealth, it's claiming that it cannot be even imagined that a person who would be able to do something societally benefitial with that amount could even exist. Just kill the evil crooks, it's that simple. You would not complain if the rich person would be super intelligent, blue eyed, pure nordic demigod that is taller than two meters. It's the shiteyed midget kikes can use their ill gotten wealth for dysgenic and societally destructive things that is bad, there should be no genetic upward mobility for males, kill all the subhumans, high quality women should not mix with lesser males.

>>507978318
In some cases they already have, having homes over the globe and heavy offshoring. There was the desire for some of the cabal to syphon the remaining wealth out of the west as quietly as possible. They'd jump ship with what is left immediately should anything like this occur, much of their cash held in foreign banks. Should asset seizure of equities occur then faith in the stock market itself and bonds would be tested. Playing nice with capital in the west merely means the charade goes on a bit longer.

>>507976509 (OP)

These billionaires wouldn't even exist under a fair system that was

- non Jewish
- didn't involve central bankers funneling money to their friends
- retarded crypto tier financial system
- snowball effect where winner takes all and companies are heavily vertically integrated monopolies running in artificially cheap credit

There's a lot of families who made their money literally in 1600-1850 and their offspring are still a significant proportion of the ultra rich.

I think the first step is fix central banking. Then make executives of corporations receiving more than X compensation criminally liable for any major lawlessness. Then make conflict of interest and lobbying laws way more severe. Then equalize capital gains and income tax. Then stop outsourcing and major corruption. Then remove laws and regulations and subsidies which favour the establishment of mega corps over medium businesses. Done all that? The ultra rich will start losing money over time unless they are very smart.

>>507978622
I'd say you should get another doctor. Healthcare should not be a profit driven business in any case.

>>507979143
The problem is, none of that is possible while the ultra-rich are running the show. There needs to be a forced intervention in order for that to happen. The goycattle will not not blindly bow to their masters while they hold all the strings.

>>507980097
and they can pay tough people with guns, bombs, vehicles a lot more money than we can. and can pay smart people who out think us a lot more than we can

Shut the fuck up, you communist. People don’t have to pay a single cent in taxes

>>507978260
Two more weeks!

>>507982162
Kinda odd seeing this from vietnam.

>>507976509 (OP)
Sounds good. We don't need kike aristocrats

>>507982162
Fuck off kike

>>507976509 (OP)
Dude 100 million is entry level rich, why not tax people who are actually rich instead?

>>507976509 (OP)
> money value is static forever

>>507976509 (OP)
>Darn I'd really love to help the people but I only have 99 million! What used to be my money is split between multiple LLC's and "charitable organizations" which is a shame cuz I'd REALLY like to give back to the citizenry at the threat of the government. Awe shucks, oh well!

>>507977584
>>507978113
>>507978384
>chuds trying desperately to cling onto the illusion that they are still right-wing while saying stuff like this

>>507986828
you give to a charity guess what 99% of that goes to the salary of the executives of that charity. very philanthropic. you pay taxes guess where most of that money goes

>>507986828
That would be outlawed as well.

>>507976509 (OP)
There are things that cost more than a 100 million, so how do you expect for people to buy super yachts or a penthouse?
Some of the richest movie directors self-fund their films which costs more than a 100 million. How will independent auteur fund their own movies?
Also billionaires and 100+ millionaires aren't carrying that money as cash, its the value of their business or the stocks they own in a business. Are private companies going to sell of their assets to pay a 100% tax on their value that exceeds the 100 million dollar limit youre enforcing?

>>507986950
>noooo i'm john galt reeeee
Just be a liberal

>>507978318
>billionaires are rootless cosmopolitans that only follow the money
Seems about right. They are also pro no borders and no countries because it only serves them.

>>507976630
Minimize and trivialize everything, anon. That will teach em. Who needs to make sense?

>>507976509 (OP)
>There's no reason any one person should have more than 100 million dollars.

Yes, there is.

What if an industry needs to buy 10 million kg of copper? Car companies will often need these amounts.

How are they supposed to buy it without being able to have in their possession 100 million dollars.

>>507976509 (OP)
And if you are asking 100 million dollars for personal use.... literally no one keeps 100 million dollars like that.

The money is always invested somewhere.

>>507989256
Corporation =/= person. Also a corporation that employs thousands of people should not be dependent on the whims of one major owner.

>>507987592
>There are things that cost more than a 100 million, so how do you expect for people to buy super yachts or a penthouse?
No one needs a 100 million dollar super yacht. Also such things are priced so inflatedly because money is fake and there's no boundaries to wealth of the ultra-rich.

>>507987592
>Some of the richest movie directors self-fund their films which costs more than a 100 million. How will independent auteur fund their own movies?
You're talking about Francis Ford Coppola here? Megalopolis wasn't exactly the triumph of private capital at play in the arts. Amusing, but absolutely not good. A demented boomer fuck concocting a delirious vision of the future.

>Are private companies going to sell of their assets to pay a 100% tax on their value that exceeds the 100 million dollar limit youre enforcing?
A good option would be that the part that goes over 100 million is just assumed property of the company and their employees.