>>508031429 (OP) >OP calls all Theism the same as classical Theism. >Somehow, OP is above the contingency argument despite being completely unable to disprove it >OP has not read any of the philosophy regarding the different definitions for god >OP doesn't realize that if any fundamental physical force was enough to create the universe, this fundamental physical force is de-facto god >Yet, SOMEHOW, OP is NOT a midwit
How hard is it to be agnostic you bumbling retard
AnonymousID: voYpuu0h
6/20/2025, 1:00:23 AM No.508032769
>>508031429 (OP) Why do you think theism doesnt run on empirical evidence? Could you just not handle that the universe is much stranger and more conplex than you believe it is? Do you think yourself God?