>>508046511You failed to use "I" correctly arising from an unscientific and disproven theory of consciousness, the Cartesian Theater. The I, exists in a mind space shaped only by words serving as an analog to navigate words which shape consciousness, distributed to a very small part of the brain where elsewhere a littany of other tasks, attentions, drives are also carried out, even disrupting or corrupting this.
It's more accurate to say a sexual impulse having arisen in me impells me to desire this fertile Hispanic woman with large hips as a result of being a biological animal with deterministic drives.
A more cogent use of declarative statement of self would consist in refusing rather than embracing such a desire. For instance, I can declare I do not consent to being sexually aroused. Yet, be that as it may, it can happen anyways despite express a priori dissent. Hence, proving ones self cannot like or will this consciously, repudiating your statement and only affirming the momentary declaration as the counter example as a true conscious though. Kant insisted a man relishing sexual matters can offer no defense as he becomes a means to an end for his vice. This is an abrupt break from his idealistic outlook but it proves biological materialist conceptions of consciousness correct and reveals the coom damaged brain. This is to say, "I don't want to deport big booty latinas" is a cogitopomorphical phantasm and cannot possibly have arisen from your actual self.