Anonymous
ID: 0R7FkpQa
6/20/2025, 7:06:59 AM No.508060878
The only reasonable solution at this point is setting women’s rights back by 100 years.
Replies:
Thread 508060878 - /pol/ [Archived: 993 hours ago]
Anonymous
ID: kXP579Ds
6/20/2025, 7:11:47 AM No.508061136
>>508060878 (OP)
women already had the vote 100 years ago. We need to set women's rights back to the fucking bronze age.
women already had the vote 100 years ago. We need to set women's rights back to the fucking bronze age.
Replies:
Anonymous
ID: 0R7FkpQa
6/20/2025, 7:29:20 AM No.508062191
>>508061136
Fair enough
Fair enough
Anonymous
ID: lWk7UfPu
6/20/2025, 7:33:33 AM No.508062432
Women are property
There I said it
There I said it
Replies:
Anonymous
ID: svrfM4Nz
6/20/2025, 7:42:06 AM No.508062953
>>508060878 (OP)
To what end? So they can nag and undermine weak men to get the vote and do it all over again? The issue isn't with women, nor even with the letter of the law. It's with the way we percieve the value and notion of the human soul. Humanism, which is the philosophical underpinning of out entire civilization and culture, is now a secularized version of the basic Christian belief that all human souls are the same, have innate worth, and are all equal in the eyes of god. To simply take away women's rights (privileges) without understanding and adapting to how we got to this clownshow in the first place will just set our grandchildren up for the same stupidity.
>>508062432
They have a will of their own, and men have a single weakness, a single hole in their ability to percieve reality, and it's women. Women evolved to be good at one thing, because they only had to be good at one thing: emotionally manipulating men. Men were already better at literally everything else, so there is an evolutionary bent towards women exploiting men's emotions to get what they want. Look out at the world today, specifically out civilization; men slave away busting their guts and don't even get anything for it anyway. Yet they still wake up every morning and work themselves to the bone and pay taxes to prop it all up.
It's easy to say that women are property, but their one schtick is planting seeds in men's minds, which in term allows them to rule reality by proxy. Men are women's property. Understand this, and all of civilization up to this point makes perfect sense.
To what end? So they can nag and undermine weak men to get the vote and do it all over again? The issue isn't with women, nor even with the letter of the law. It's with the way we percieve the value and notion of the human soul. Humanism, which is the philosophical underpinning of out entire civilization and culture, is now a secularized version of the basic Christian belief that all human souls are the same, have innate worth, and are all equal in the eyes of god. To simply take away women's rights (privileges) without understanding and adapting to how we got to this clownshow in the first place will just set our grandchildren up for the same stupidity.
>>508062432
They have a will of their own, and men have a single weakness, a single hole in their ability to percieve reality, and it's women. Women evolved to be good at one thing, because they only had to be good at one thing: emotionally manipulating men. Men were already better at literally everything else, so there is an evolutionary bent towards women exploiting men's emotions to get what they want. Look out at the world today, specifically out civilization; men slave away busting their guts and don't even get anything for it anyway. Yet they still wake up every morning and work themselves to the bone and pay taxes to prop it all up.
It's easy to say that women are property, but their one schtick is planting seeds in men's minds, which in term allows them to rule reality by proxy. Men are women's property. Understand this, and all of civilization up to this point makes perfect sense.
Replies:
Anonymous
ID: 3teUR54B
6/20/2025, 7:46:00 AM No.508063169
>>508060878 (OP)
Jewish datamining thread
Jewish datamining thread
Replies:
Anonymous
ID: 0R7FkpQa
6/20/2025, 7:48:11 AM No.508063307
>>508063169
Mediocre cope
Mediocre cope
Anonymous
ID: lWk7UfPu
6/20/2025, 7:50:47 AM No.508063463
>>508062953
True but only to the point that men allow it. Like you said yourself men are better at everything else. Men hold the keys to everything and for thousands of years were the ones who made all the decisions. Only recently when women were given the right to vote and decide for themselves did society begin to decay. Once women begin making decisions everything falls to shit. It's a symbiotic relationship but someone has to be the sole leader for it to work.
True but only to the point that men allow it. Like you said yourself men are better at everything else. Men hold the keys to everything and for thousands of years were the ones who made all the decisions. Only recently when women were given the right to vote and decide for themselves did society begin to decay. Once women begin making decisions everything falls to shit. It's a symbiotic relationship but someone has to be the sole leader for it to work.
Replies:
Anonymous
ID: LzsJ+ofV
6/20/2025, 8:05:10 AM No.508064337
SHUT!
UP!
UP!
Anonymous
ID: svrfM4Nz
6/20/2025, 8:13:16 AM No.508064777
>>508063463
>Men hold the keys to everything and for thousands of years were the ones who made all the decisions.
Nominally this is correct. But the reality is far from that black and white. All of the thoughts that you have, in your prefrontal cortex, originate first from feelings in your lizardbrain. We like to think we're rational, but we're not. If a woman comes along and alters and influences those emotions, then the very way you think, and thus act, and thus everything that you're better than a woman at, begins with the woman tugging at your heartstrings, as it were.
The extent to which men were actually in control is actually entirely up for debate. The physical reason why women gained direct hegemony over society is that modernity enabled a set of social conditions which always happened in the background, and the subtle game through which women control everything just became a bit more blatant. Even if you say things like "women are property", and make social and legal changes to that effect, nothing will actually change. Over a few generations we will end up where we are now, because where we are now is a convergence point between the fundamentals of human gynocracy and modern technology. If you want to go back to a time in which everyone pretends men are in charge (everywhere prior to 1900), the only way to do so is to undo the technological and economic changes, but all that does is set us up to be destroyed and colonized by another group of people who don't follow the same restrictions. It's kind of a non-starter.
>Men hold the keys to everything and for thousands of years were the ones who made all the decisions.
Nominally this is correct. But the reality is far from that black and white. All of the thoughts that you have, in your prefrontal cortex, originate first from feelings in your lizardbrain. We like to think we're rational, but we're not. If a woman comes along and alters and influences those emotions, then the very way you think, and thus act, and thus everything that you're better than a woman at, begins with the woman tugging at your heartstrings, as it were.
The extent to which men were actually in control is actually entirely up for debate. The physical reason why women gained direct hegemony over society is that modernity enabled a set of social conditions which always happened in the background, and the subtle game through which women control everything just became a bit more blatant. Even if you say things like "women are property", and make social and legal changes to that effect, nothing will actually change. Over a few generations we will end up where we are now, because where we are now is a convergence point between the fundamentals of human gynocracy and modern technology. If you want to go back to a time in which everyone pretends men are in charge (everywhere prior to 1900), the only way to do so is to undo the technological and economic changes, but all that does is set us up to be destroyed and colonized by another group of people who don't follow the same restrictions. It's kind of a non-starter.
Replies:
Anonymous
ID: iu+UcFi/
6/20/2025, 8:14:50 AM No.508064869
Anonymous
ID: hZzfz2EK
6/20/2025, 8:31:25 AM No.508065766
>>508060878 (OP)
>The only reasonable solution at this point is
to stop pretending browns and blacks are like us and thus stop giving them Human rights, which is a White construct.
>The only reasonable solution at this point is
to stop pretending browns and blacks are like us and thus stop giving them Human rights, which is a White construct.
Anonymous
ID: Kz0s1Ziz
6/20/2025, 8:33:04 AM No.508065857
>>508060878 (OP)
and this has what to do with smosh?
and this has what to do with smosh?
Replies:
Anonymous
ID: 0R7FkpQa
6/20/2025, 8:37:23 AM No.508066109
>>508065857
Bros before hoes, that’s what.
Bros before hoes, that’s what.
Replies:
Anonymous
ID: J8WgY3ri
6/20/2025, 8:38:39 AM No.508066181
>>508060996
fpbp
fpbp
Anonymous
ID: lWk7UfPu
6/20/2025, 8:44:53 AM No.508066554
>>508064777
So basically men should become more overt. Anything covert and background is women's work. All it takes is men putting their hand down and saying this is enough because by your own explanation and my own understanding women have no real power outside of warping mens minds
So basically men should become more overt. Anything covert and background is women's work. All it takes is men putting their hand down and saying this is enough because by your own explanation and my own understanding women have no real power outside of warping mens minds
Replies:
Anonymous
ID: svrfM4Nz
6/20/2025, 9:05:14 AM No.508067601
>>508066554
I mean, sure. The honest truth is that I don't actually know what the solution can be. Anything done to resolve this problem within the framework of what we know will be a half-measure which is short lived, and our grandsons will be digging through the same pile of shit in a few generations. There is a concept within civilization analysis called "decadence", which in this context refers to the complacency and consequently degeneracy which occurs as an advanced society becomes too used to it's own greatness and thinks that civilization and prosperity are normal things, rather than historically aberrations which require enormous concerted effort to maintain. What we're talking about here is solving a problem which emerged due to decadence, but sooner or later our descendants will make the same mistakes. So to me, simply putting our feet down will work a little bit for now, but personally I have always hated bandaids on bullet wounds type solutions to complex problems. One thing we do know for sure is that women were nominally 'property' and now they aren't, which kind of means that that line of thinking is technically ineffective. Simply turning back the clock is just inviting the same problem over and over again.
I mean, sure. The honest truth is that I don't actually know what the solution can be. Anything done to resolve this problem within the framework of what we know will be a half-measure which is short lived, and our grandsons will be digging through the same pile of shit in a few generations. There is a concept within civilization analysis called "decadence", which in this context refers to the complacency and consequently degeneracy which occurs as an advanced society becomes too used to it's own greatness and thinks that civilization and prosperity are normal things, rather than historically aberrations which require enormous concerted effort to maintain. What we're talking about here is solving a problem which emerged due to decadence, but sooner or later our descendants will make the same mistakes. So to me, simply putting our feet down will work a little bit for now, but personally I have always hated bandaids on bullet wounds type solutions to complex problems. One thing we do know for sure is that women were nominally 'property' and now they aren't, which kind of means that that line of thinking is technically ineffective. Simply turning back the clock is just inviting the same problem over and over again.
Anonymous
ID: 3kj2jnQG
6/20/2025, 9:35:50 AM No.508069304
>>508060878 (OP)
what does smosh have to do with that?
what does smosh have to do with that?
Replies:
Anonymous
ID: 0R7FkpQa
6/20/2025, 9:41:52 AM No.508069608
Anonymous
ID: vtCsooFW
6/20/2025, 10:12:12 AM No.508071125
>>508069304
SHUT UP
SHUT UP
Anonymous
ID: yPx3eudJ
6/20/2025, 10:14:41 AM No.508071251
Wtf are you talking about retard?
women have always had better rights than men
women have always had better rights than men
Replies:
Anonymous
ID: 0R7FkpQa
6/20/2025, 10:16:20 AM No.508071409
>>508071251
It’s gone too far
It’s gone too far
Anonymous
ID: wRq/gxu0
6/20/2025, 10:17:29 AM No.508071471
>>508060878 (OP)
>The only reasonable solution at this point is setting women’s rights back by 100 years.
Good luck with that considering that both the right and left are dominated by simps.
>The only reasonable solution at this point is setting women’s rights back by 100 years.
Good luck with that considering that both the right and left are dominated by simps.
Anonymous
ID: wcoLrhxS
6/20/2025, 10:18:12 AM No.508071508
>>508060878 (OP)
Or we could just stop giving tax cuts to rich people. You know, because Republican tax cuts are responsible for like 90 percent of the deficit. Also, we could fund the retirement of old people easily by just raising taxes on the rich. We don't need to birth an army of wage cucks to do that. We don't need immigration or high birth rates. Rich people just need to pay more in taxes. Them paying more in taxes won't affect their quality of life or the economy; it will just hurt their egos.
Or we could just stop giving tax cuts to rich people. You know, because Republican tax cuts are responsible for like 90 percent of the deficit. Also, we could fund the retirement of old people easily by just raising taxes on the rich. We don't need to birth an army of wage cucks to do that. We don't need immigration or high birth rates. Rich people just need to pay more in taxes. Them paying more in taxes won't affect their quality of life or the economy; it will just hurt their egos.