if you are pro-ukraine and pro-iran what side do you belong to?
What a cutie patootie kitty cat
The dualistic mindset that permeates Western consciousness creates artificial divisions that fragment our experience of reality. By splitting existence into opposing pairs - good/evil, rich/poor, self/other, success/failure - this worldview generates the very suffering it often seeks to address. The illusion of separation becomes self-perpetuating, as we perceive lack where there is fullness, see catastrophic evil where there is temporary imbalance, and experience isolation where there is inherent connection.
This dualistic infection runs deep through Western institutions and thinking patterns. In politics, it manifests as unbridgeable partisan divides and zero-sum power struggles. In Christianity and its offshoots, it appears as rigid distinctions between sacred and profane, heaven and hell, saved and damned - creating a cosmic drama of absolute good versus absolute evil that shapes how we view both spirituality and morality. In economics, it shows up as the perceived split between abundance and scarcity, creating artificial lack through the very belief in lack itself. Even love becomes distorted into a quest for completion through another, rather than recognition of an already-present wholeness.
The tragic irony is that attempts to resolve these perceived splits often reinforce them. Religious teachings try to bridge divine and human while inadvertently emphasizing their separation. Political solutions based on opposition perpetuate conflict. Economic systems founded on scarcity generate actual scarcity. The very frameworks we use to understand and discuss these issues - our language, symbols, and concepts - are often rooted in and limited by dualistic assumptions. Moving beyond this paradigm requires more than new solutions within the old framework - it calls for a fundamental shift in how we perceive and relate to reality itself.
>>508074642No, you cannot fuck it, toxotranny.
>>508074642Imagine the money and status you would enjoy if you came up with a genetic modification so cats could have cool hairstyles like this, or go the other way and have actual cat girls
ngl I would bang a girl with cute cat whiskers and enjoy her mewling noises
We should abolish war so we can focus on the kind of science that actually matters
>>508074649hehe, uk is anything but winning
my heart blossoms as I see your "empire" being slowly being driven into poverty
>>508074914I'm not even a furry and I think this is a great idea. I want a cute girlfriend with whiskers and cat ears.
>>508075096Yes I guess white people in turmoil would make your shitskin heart flutter
>>508074566 (OP)No such position exists.
You are either pro-Russia and pro-Iran, or pro-Ukraine and pro-Israel.
If you have any other position and you are a liar.
>>508074566 (OP)It's the anti-war side. Not wanting your country invaded and bombed by jews or mongoloids is a normie take.
Or you just like rooting for the underdog, which is based.
>>508074645well, yeah.
You're basically describing the philosophical consequences of fuzzy logic. but clearly unsolveable with just fuzzy math. my take is that the modern attitude of forced 'spectrum' acceptance of everything is retarded across the board just like implementing every single numerical value as a fuzzy value would be retarded implementation. Underlying structure is everything and that concept nests to infinity.
I'm kind of chasing ideas of mathematical pockets that things like to fall into and building a math to allow for and to find that. a way to view the texture of logic and then make decisions based on that. a way to capture the entire dynamic you're calling 'framework' and find a universal underlying structure to it.
everything in all of existence can be described as a single string of characters. There is no way to describe anything that isn't a single string of characters on every level of resolution. In all of God's creation. I think the truth of this statement has serious philosophical implications about the universe and how we should be studying it.
>>508074645Nah it's deeper than that. It's about taboo and how in the west everything, every single taboo, every single corner of ambiguity must be fully enunciated, decorticated, digested and then shat.
Miss Kobayashi's Dragon Maid is the ultimate proof f this phenomenon. Nobody in the West could in his right mind write a show like this that mixes degeneracy with responsibility, motherhood with pedophilia, tradition with their upheaval.
>>508077300>Miss Kobayashi's Dragon Maidyour point about taboo enunciation is pretty fucking true tho